The Great Porn Debate - The Coomites vs Anti-Faparians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The point isn't to help those who are addicted by means of some legal bandaid, the point is to have an already abstinent community, and when the foreigner comes to corrupt your morals and your customs, to create a demand where there previously was none, you kill him. Even you can even prevent one child from falling into pornography, even if you're otherwise completely impotent in your prohibition, that is still a success. Even if you punish only one pornographers, and all the others flee to live in luxury in Costa Rica, you have done justice to the world, and that justifies the entier endeavour.
Here’s where my personal, somewhat religious views come into play. I believe that the bedrock of society is the family unit in every regard. I want men to abstain, and I want women to only choose men who live up to that standard. We can have all the laws on Earth, but if guys and gals don’t personally morally support the reason for those laws they are next to useless.
Same with the men, don’t pick girls who don’t live up to these standards and after a while society will adapt by necessity.
And with drugs, as a side, I don’t think full legalization is a good idea for most illegal drugs, but rather more sensible discussions and penalties than what we have now.
 
I'm pretty sure some angry neckbeard, probably schizo, on an internet forum that's mad about birth control being legal being a virgin is not much of a stretch. How about not going full retard and power leveling about how you've never been in a real sexual relationship with a woman? lol


Stigmatized? Depends on the context. Illegal? Nope. If you want to rant about how you're an epic trad-alt-right lolcow in the mold of gay icon Nick Fuentes at least open a few books and read first. I know you people are usually dumb as dirt, but you could at least try to sound smart for appearances.


This thread really is lolcow bait isn't it? lol
Uh, yes. Your lolcow tendencies are pretty clear, though. Being obsessed with pornography isn't really a good identity, sweetie.
 
>arguing with retards who want to overthrow the government and kill people over internet porn means you have a porn obsessed identity

Yeah, okay, retard.
Oh, wow, more snide insolence from a future (presumably) whiteboi cum dumpster. Your pornsick oversocialization means you're sickeningly willing to create these extreme strawmen from the arguments made here. Quite sad, really. Please do better, sweetie.
 
Well, you started posting in the Onion Farms thread about how KF is evil.
If I posted about how evil KF is then you'll have no problem proving that. To the contrary actually, I typically negrated most anti-KF/Null sentiment. In fact, I was ruffling feathers too much and someone PM'd me basically warning me not to do so:

20230715_213443.jpg
20230715_213645.jpg

The main reason I even joined that forum was because I couldn't be bothered to mess with Tor and wanted to keep up on KF because I actually like this site. But feel free to keep having a meltdown about it and lying, I guess :story:

I think it's more of a /pol/ fag/nazi thing. I think you claimed to not be one before or something, but you clearly are influenced by their ideas.
How so? Because I haven't extolled the virtues of simulated rape, hipno sissy, lolicon, incest, and faggot porn like a good free speech advocate?
 
If I posted about how evil KF is then you'll have no problem proving that. To the contrary actually, I typically negrated most anti-KF/Null sentiment. In fact, I was ruffling feathers too much and someone PM'd me basically warning me not to do so:

View attachment 5213316
View attachment 5213317

The main reason I even joined that forum was because I couldn't be bothered to mess with Tor and wanted to keep up on KF because I actually like this site. But feel free to keep having a meltdown about it and lying, I guess :story:


How so? Because I haven't extolled the virtues of simulated rape, hipno sissy, lolicon, incest, and faggot porn like a good free speech advocate?
C'mon, bruh, just because public 'anti-fascists' like Noah Berlatsky are working for organisations like Prostasia trying to legalise Paedophillia doesn't mean there's a connection there, don't go buck wild now, @Mothra1988 needs to be on the right side of history, here, you can't deny him that.
 
@OninFarms_Ness, I said the thread was about how KF was evil, and you are a regular in that thread. Not my fault you were dumb enough do that and think you wouldn't get mocked for it.

Not responding to any more autism or strawman bait, especially the schizo retard who keeps posting word salad.
 
@OninFarms_Ness, I said the thread was about how KF was evil, and you are a regular in that thread.
Uh, no, that's not what you said. I know you think you're smarter than everybody but we can at least read.

Not responding
Good, you lost yet another debate, just like when you tried defending lolicon, or when you said I was a retard for thinking there wasn't going to be a red wave in the midterms, and basically every other time we've disagreed. How many Ls are you gonna take from me?

Are you sure you're a lesbian, it seems like you're dragging me into your weird humiliation fetish or something.
 
Uh, no, that's not what you said. I know you think you're smarter than everybody but we can at least read.
It's literally what I said, dumbass:

Well, you started posting in the Onion Farms thread about how KF is evil.
"thread about," as in it's the subject of the thread. You read it wrong. That's what the thread is about, and you post in it.

Good, you lost yet another debate
You didn't win anything. People pointed out legal precedent that proved your position was stupid, and your response was to say you were going to get rid of the constitution and put "boots on people's necks" like a delusional psychopath. You are a fucking nut, just because you spent most of your time here arguing with an even dumber idiot, HHH, does not mean you are smart or good at debate. lol

I'm not responding to these other attempts at bad bait to drag this down some autistic rabbit hole (for the 50th time). The only thing I will concede was I was wrong about the Republicans not performing better during midterms, but so were most people, including people like Nate Silver who usually tilts towards Democrat bias. I guess I was naive for not being blackpilled enough on elections. If you want to consider that as some kind of weird W in your schizo head, go ahead, but that's pretty autistic.
 
"thread about," as in it's the subject of the thread. You read it wrong. That's what the thread is about, and you post in it.
As if the implication wasn't clear. If you keep playing stupid so long people might believe you.

The only thing I will concede was I was wrong about the Republicans not performing better during midterms
At least you concede that...but you won't concede that I shredded you in the loli thread? You couldn't articulate a defense beyond, yet again, "free speech".
 
Notice how they always have to slide into strawman arguments about drugs, CP, whatever the fuck else. It's because they know adult porn is relatively harmless on their own and they sound stupid talking about it in those terms, so better change the subject and then pretend like that weak-ass logic covers the non-strawman position.
Are they strawman arguments if they are attacking the industry as a whole? I don't think people opposing porn do think adult porn is relatively harmless, even if only adults were viewing it. To artificially separate the legal from the illegal parts of the industry seems incredibly naive, like setting the legal and illegal parts of the motor industry apart, have you heard of Dieselgate? The porn industry, like most, is riddled with abusers and sharks attracted to the money.

Putting it another way: if in a debate about child murder both sides agree late term and even full term abortions are very rare compared to much earlier killings of the growing child (even if they don't agree it is a child), they can still include that horror in the overall discussion, but exclude it from the portion of it centered on early term abortion.
Similarly discussing the currently legal (in most places) pornography we can set aside CP/rape materials etc. when discussing the legal materials, but include the illegal ones when talking about the overall industry. Perhaps a better analogy might be including illegal vs legal abortions in a discussion about abortions.

Don't worry bud, I can edit what people say in a quote for a lame gag.
Me too.
 
What a thread. Is the porn idustry sketchy? Of course, don't consume the material if it violates your moral code. Will jerking off to some amateur vid every now and then cause you to go blind or ruin your prospects of a traditional family? No.

I really don't understand why this debate even exists to begin with. Everybody likes busting a nut on occasion, problems only arise when you start abusing pornography as a cope for deeper issues.

Just moderate yourself, it's really not that fucking hard.
 
What a thread. Is the porn idustry sketchy? Of course, don't consume the material if it violates your moral code. Will jerking off to some amateur vid every now and then cause you to go blind or ruin your prospects of a traditional family? No.

I really don't understand why this debate even exists to begin with. Everybody likes busting a nut on occasion, problems only arise when you start abusing pornography as a cope for deeper issues.

Just moderate yourself, it's really not that fucking hard.

I'm sorry I'm going to have to lobotomize you now, you've just imagined that girl naked.
 
Everybody likes busting a nut on occasion
OK, but why should we facilitate the existence of an entire industry around smut just because humans sometimes masturbate?
This is a red herring.
Feel free to bust a nut in the privacy of your home. We will not promote this nor glorify this nor normalize it. We will strictly regulate the porn industry with the eventual goal of getting rid of it.
What's the issue? You can masturbate without porn, gorrillions of humans did it before you, use your imagination.
 
OK, but why should we facilitate the existence of an entire industry around smut just because humans sometimes masturbate?
This is a red herring.
Feel free to bust a nut in the privacy of your home. We will not promote this nor glorify this nor normalize it. We will strictly regulate the porn industry with the eventual goal of getting rid of it.
What's the issue? You can masturbate without porn, gorrillions of humans did it before you, use your imagination.

Well those archeologists like to say they were "fertility icons" but I think differently.

venus-of-willendorf-1-1.jpg
 
Well those archeologists like to say they were "fertility icons" but I think differently.

View attachment 5217172
Those are "Mother Goddess" statues and are hardly porn, plus in ancient time there was religious, "sacred" prostitution. That is still not porn.
And some of those statues are having agricultural motifs, like things growing out of them, so yeah they are fertility-linked.
I would suggest reading Mircea Eliade's History of Religions for more details on this sort of arcane stuff.
 
Back
Top Bottom