The Boys - An Amazon Prime adaptation of the Ennis comic series

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
they really don't get how they portraying the "heroes" as cucks, normies as retards, other supers as absolute deviants, and making their only good character a villain with a fucked up backstory makes people root for him instead of anyone else
Not to mention they want us to hate a guy who is a walking bundle of psychological trauma and PTSD. They tortured a child, deprived him of love and approval while instilling the need for them into him, groomed him into a certain personality instead of allowing him to form his own. Like, no shit the dude is fucked up and hates humanity after experiencing first hand how absolutely detestable humans can be.

The dude is the victim turned villain. That's why him slaughtering the scientists was really hard to feel bad about, they were even bigger monsters than he is. Even Homelander knows that torturing kids is wrong, but apparently they don't. Was very satisfying watching him flambe Frank and emasculate Marty because holy shit they deserved it. And locking the old scientist bitch in with the corpses of her staff after welding the door shut was also well deserved after she outright tried to justify torturing a child and admitted to being one of the people ordering it done.

Seriously, outside of a a few incidents (like throwing that suicide chick off the roof) most of Homelander's victims seem to really, really fucking deserve it.
 
Not to mention they want us to hate a guy who is a walking bundle of psychological trauma and PTSD. They tortured a child, deprived him of love and approval while instilling the need for them into him, groomed him into a certain personality instead of allowing him to form his own. Like, no shit the dude is fucked up and hates humanity after experiencing first hand how absolutely detestable humans can be.

The dude is the victim turned villain. That's why him slaughtering the scientists was really hard to feel bad about, they were even bigger monsters than he is. Even Homelander knows that torturing kids is wrong, but apparently they don't. Was very satisfying watching him flambe Frank and emasculate Marty because holy shit they deserved it. And locking the old scientist bitch in with the corpses of her staff after welding the door shut was also well deserved after she outright tried to justify torturing a child and admitted to being one of the people ordering it done.

Seriously, outside of a a few incidents (like throwing that suicide chick off the roof) most of Homelander's victims seem to really, really fucking deserve it.
They literally pulled mengele levels of fucked up experiments on Homelander.
isnt the main writer of the show Jewish, I mean I guess they don’t have the self awareness that someone in a situation like that becomes incredibly sympathetic.
But, their attempts to infuse the story with modern-day politics ends up with A-Train being redeemable because he's black. At this point, A-Train already made peace with Hughie, stuck his neck out for guy, and he's felt guilty for sticking with the pro-white Vought company that sponsored heroes like Firecracker and Blue Hawk who look down on blacks.
wasn’t Stan Edgar, a black man running this company for some 30 years. If there’s any anti black heroes being promoted, wouldn’t that be his fault. And the one black guy he does hire to be on the 7 A-Train is a narcissistic murderer.

black noir is black, but nobody knows his race anyway so it doesn’t count.
 
For anyone wondering about the intent of the writing in the fourth episode of Season 4.

This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
 
That always bothered me, how Vought claimed that the Supes came from God and people just bought it. It's obviously a jab at religious people, especially white Christians, but in reality, most churches would be doing their own snooping around and won't just buy such a line so easily. Especially when it comes from a secular company, not a religious organization. So when Vought says that the Supes' powers come from God, most religious groups will be asking ''whose God?''
I wonder if it would even matter if the supers are from god or not, wouldn’t the mere existence of supers make the chance of god existing more likely,
one of the arguments against religion is none of that stuff is real, how can you say Jesus can’t turn water to wine when we’ve got Homelander flying around at supersonic speeds with laser beams coming out of his eyes.
they likely had to rewrite the laws of physics to account for superheroes.
 
They literally pulled mengele levels of fucked up experiments on Homelander.
isnt the main writer of the show Jewish, I mean I guess they don’t have the self awareness that someone in a situation like that becomes incredibly sympathetic.
Exactly. Like I said, Homelander getting his revenge on those guys is the equivalent of a Holocaust survivor shoving the Waffen-SS guards who lorded over him into the oven. It's hard for us to feel sympathy for people who did nothing as the doctors put kids in ovens or made fun of them when they ''relieved'' themselves.

wasn’t Stan Edgar, a black man running this company for some 30 years. If there’s any anti black heroes being promoted, wouldn’t that be his fault. And the one black guy he does hire to be on the 7 A-Train is a narcissistic murderer.

black noir is black, but nobody knows his race anyway so it doesn’t count.
Stan Edgar was the one who brought Stormfront, a literal fucking Nazi, into the Seven, to Homelander's immense displeasure. And he did it only so people would get mad so they'd buy more Compound V, which would raise Vought's stock price.

You're right, A-Train was the main openly black guy in the Seven, and he was originally a complete asshole. Not to mention that Black Noir, as Bob Singer said, is practically a war criminal.

I wonder if it would even matter if the supers are from god or not, wouldn’t the mere existence of supers make the chance of god existing more likely,
one of the arguments against religion is none of that stuff is real, how can you say Jesus can’t turn water to wine when we’ve got Homelander flying around at supersonic speeds with laser beams coming out of his eyes.
they likely had to rewrite the laws of physics to account for superheroes.
Basically, yes. The Supes put one big fat dent on the idea that God's miracles are impossible when miracles of science are flying around, super-speeding from place to place, shrinking or growing themselves, using super-strength, telekinesis, and laser eyes, among other things.

I'm not sure I would classify what happened to her as rape. He gave her a choice: Suck off or fuck off. She chose the former, she didn't have to. It's still a damn scummy thing to do for sure, but I'm not sure I would call it rape. Definitely coercion, but she always had a choice to tell him to fuck off and leave.
So basically, Starlight chose her career over her dignity. She could've chosen dignity and fucked off, but she wanted to stay in the Seven. They should've just made it outright rape so that she'd come off as more sympathetic. As in, ''you let us fuck you, or we break your limbs and then fuck you anyways.'' At least that would've been more sympathetic as compared to her sacrificing her dignity for her career.

Although, it would've probably spoiled the story if Starlight realized that Homelander and Black Noir's dongs looked the same.

I would've written it differently, if it were me. I'd have it so that A-Train, Black Noir, and Homelander are sexually ravaging lower-level female Supes and employees, and they expected Starlight to join in, telling her that she can have any man or woman she wanted since she's one of the Seven, and she'd feel conflicted over fitting in and her own sense of right and wrong. It'd be her ''initiation ritual'', joining in on fucking those below her, as Homelander would explain to her that this is their way to establish dominance as a member of the Seven. And Homelander would make it clear to Starlight that if she doesn't choose someone, they'll be screwing her over next.

Fuck, you can even make that how Starlight and Hughie meet. Hughie's there incognito as a way to infiltrate Vought and get close to the Seven, Starlight eventually chooses him as her ''victim'', and she tops him, but he enjoys it, and they trade numbers and promise to do it again in a more comfortable environment.

As an aside, I actually root for Homelander in this show. His enemies are fucking idiots and often no better than he is, and frankly I often root for the bad guy when they're cool enough (for example the Empire in Star Wars, they were awesome.) Not to mention they've literally turned this into a left vs right issue wherein the left are the people against Homelander and the right are the people for him. And since I hate the left with a white hot burning passion I legit hope he wins and does horrible fucking shit to them because the showrunners try to do a "This is what will happen if those evil Nazi Republicans win!" sort of ending.
That's basically what's happening with most of the people who watch this show. Most of them couldn't give less of a shit about any of the good guys who aren't Butcher, meanwhile Homelander is the one everyone looks forward to seeing. That's why he's showing up in video game crossovers in fucking Fortnite and Mortal Kombat. And this last episode had more people rooting for him considering that what the lab coats did to him was genuinely cruel.

they really don't get how they portraying the "heroes" as cucks, normies as retards, other supers as absolute deviants, and making their only good character a villain with a fucked up backstory makes people root for him instead of anyone else
Exactly. People don't like to root for pansies; they want heroes who accomplish things, or an intelligent villain with nuanced motivations. This is why characters like Thrawn sold so well back in the 1990s, or why Azula is everyone's favorite bae back in Avatar the Last Airbender. As much as they try to make the audience root for Hughie and Starlight, Homelander's the guy everyone wants to watch.

Not to mention they want us to hate a guy who is a walking bundle of psychological trauma and PTSD. They tortured a child, deprived him of love and approval while instilling the need for them into him, groomed him into a certain personality instead of allowing him to form his own. Like, no shit the dude is fucked up and hates humanity after experiencing first hand how absolutely detestable humans can be.

The dude is the victim turned villain. That's why him slaughtering the scientists was really hard to feel bad about, they were even bigger monsters than he is. Even Homelander knows that torturing kids is wrong, but apparently they don't. Was very satisfying watching him flambe Frank and emasculate Marty because holy shit they deserved it. And locking the old scientist bitch in with the corpses of her staff after welding the door shut was also well deserved after she outright tried to justify torturing a child and admitted to being one of the people ordering it done.
Again, if Eric Kripke's motivation is to make us hate Homelander, he's failing really hard, especially after that last episode when we found out how evil the people who raised him were. What he did to them, most people would've done the same in Homelander's shoes. Especially if they had that kind of a tortured childhood. So yes, if you got put in an oven while some dipshit was playing basketball with paper balls and a trash can, or if some doctor called you ''squirt'' after seeing you relieve yourself, then you're going to hate their fucking guts just as much as Homelander did.

Hell, most people wouldn't even bother bringing them a cake. They'd just go full Mewtwo and just blow up the lab without a word.

Seriously, outside of a a few incidents (like throwing that suicide chick off the roof) most of Homelander's victims seem to really, really fucking deserve it.
It's that, plus the two airplane incidents, with him lasering one and letting the other crash, but for the most part, yes.
 
Last edited:
Although, it would've probably spoiled the story if Starlight realized that Homelander and Black Noir's dongs looked the same.
Homelander at some point in the comics makes metion of the similarities between his and Noir's dicks. It's an off the cuff aside.
 
His other comic Hitman is very good.
His new Frank Castle/Nick Fury-in-Vietnam comic with art by Jacen Burrows is one of the more solid titles from a Big Two publisher I've read in awhile.

MWdBi.jpg
 
You know what I hate the most about the leftist fanbase of this show? (Well, other than the fact that they're a bunch of leftist scum)
They're the same people who will screech that you're not media literate enough while having the audacity to call this show political satire. It ain't, it's propaganda. Satire seeks to take a worldview and criticize it through exaggeration. Satire doesn't tell you what to believe, propaganda does. The amount of leftist drivel in this show that is basically positioned as the default "correct" thing to believe simply because the evil supes are against it makes it propaganda.
 
they really don't get how they portraying the "heroes" as cucks, normies as retards, other supers as absolute deviants, and making their only good character a villain with a fucked up backstory makes people root for him instead of anyone else
They want us to root for a mean girl with pretty extreme narcissism. It's almost as if the show is aimed at insulting people who stand up to their bullies or abusers.
 
You know what I hate the most about the leftist fanbase of this show? (Well, other than the fact that they're a bunch of leftist scum)
They're the same people who will screech that you're not media literate enough while having the audacity to call this show political satire. It ain't, it's propaganda. Satire seeks to take a worldview and criticize it through exaggeration. Satire doesn't tell you what to believe, propaganda does. The amount of leftist drivel in this show that is basically positioned as the default "correct" thing to believe simply because the evil supes are against it makes it propaganda.
They're also the same people who uncritically swallowed up the MCU slop like it was chicken soup and asked for seconds. They're the exact same people that Season 1 of the show was meant to satirize. That was before Kripke made the show about how WASP America and the Right as a whole are evil Nazis in the later seasons.
 
Last edited:
People who brag about their "media literacy" are just Breadtuber-watching rubes who think they're smart because they've read articles on obscure Communist politicians saying "I have an invisible Ph.D in watching TV". Most of the "media literacy" people I've seen are pretty stupid, and have trouble discussing media outside of TV and film. Dealing with people who think they're cinema buffs because they post reviews of the latest Criterion Collection pap on Letterboxd, but get all huffy and defensive about corporate nerdslop...It's nothing new, I remember seeing a few dustups on blogs and Livejournals and such back in the aughts where there'd be these people who'd throw out accusations against authors and books and go on about tropes and subtext and white-splaining and so on and I'd read post after post by the major players in these loud, angry arguments that sprawled through various blogs, comment sections, etc. constantly talking about genre TV shows instead of the books and authors supposedly under discussion. "Erm, I've never read the book or any of this author's books, but I want to continue in dragging them for their supposed racism, sexism, etc. so instead, let's turn to my vast knowledge of Buffy, the Vampire Slayer."
 
People who brag about their "media literacy" are just Breadtuber-watching rubes who think they're smart because they've read articles on obscure Communist politicians saying "I have an invisible Ph.D in watching TV". Most of the "media literacy" people I've seen are pretty stupid, and have trouble discussing media outside of TV and film. Dealing with people who think they're cinema buffs because they post reviews of the latest Criterion Collection pap on Letterboxd, but get all huffy and defensive about corporate nerdslop...It's nothing new, I remember seeing a few dustups on blogs and Livejournals and such back in the aughts where there'd be these people who'd throw out accusations against authors and books and go on about tropes and subtext and white-splaining and so on and I'd read post after post by the major players in these loud, angry arguments that sprawled through various blogs, comment sections, etc. constantly talking about genre TV shows instead of the books and authors supposedly under discussion. "Erm, I've never read the book or any of this author's books, but I want to continue in dragging them for their supposed racism, sexism, etc. so instead, let's turn to my vast knowledge of Buffy, the Vampire Slayer."
"Media literacy" as a concept seems almost self-defeating. After all, if a piece of media has something to say beyond what it overtly says, and can't convey that to layman, then that sounds more like a producer problem than a consumer problem. How does the saying go? "If you can't explain it to a five year old, you can't explain it?"


The only exception I can think of is inside baseball, where someone from a particular specialization adds material that only people familiar with the topic would get- but that's a bonus, it's not the story. Otherwise, the curtains are fucking blue.
 
People who brag about their "media literacy" are just Breadtuber-watching rubes who think they're smart because they've read articles on obscure Communist politicians saying "I have an invisible Ph.D in watching TV". Most of the "media literacy" people I've seen are pretty stupid
It tends to be that way, they can't differentiate rightwingers shitposting about it (knowing it's propaganda) vs. themselves knowing that it is propaganda. And no, it's not the "I was only pretending to be stupid" meme, it really is just the breadtubers can't comprehend that it has always been like this, that Hollywood has always made lefty propaganda and people just shitposts about it. They made up a new word trying to intellectualise rightwing shitposts because they can't cope with all the new nooticer memes fucking with them.

 
Last edited:
It tends to be that way, they can't differentiate rightwingers shitposting about it (knowing it's propaganda) vs. themselves knowing that it is propaganda. And no, it's not the "I was only pretending to be stupid" meme, it really is just the breadtubers can't comprehend that it has always been like this, that Hollywood has always made lefty propaganda and people just shitposts about it. They made up a new word trying to intellectualise rightwing shitposts because they can't cope with all the new nooticer memes fucking with them.
These people don't understand that the other side understands that the media criticizes them, so the other side flips the story to make the strawman villains the good guys. From people who became fans of Rorschach and Judge Dredd, to 40K and Star Wars fans rooting for the evil empire that the authors made into the embodiment of everything right-wing, and even the people who watch James Cameron's Avatar movies while cheering on the humans, this isn't anything new. They just cheer for the designated bad guy either because the bad guy is cooler, or they don't like the heroes, or whatever party platform the authors stand for. Homelander fans just don't want to cheer for Hughie, Butcher, or Starlight. Especially when they don't really accomplish anything of note, and all they do is fail to defeat their enemy, even when victory is within their grasp.
 
Last edited:
They've returned to the theme of women being scared of Homelander, and how they rationalize their manipulation/abuse of him (which is actually for profit). It made sense when it was just Madeline, because she was always walking a tightrope around him, always changing her behavior to keep Homelander pliant: from boss lady to mommy to awestruck mortal, she played whatever role was required in the moment. When she finally admitted "I'm scared of you," it was believable. Barbara, on the other hand, had complete control over John. Even in the short time we saw her, she never displayed fear like Madeline did. She didn't change her persona around him, she molded his personality into something she could control. Nevertheless, we're supposed to believe he terrified everyone from infancy and that's why they enslaved and tortured him. (But also they were just following orders and thought he was so harmless they mocked him when he was a child.) I can't tell if the writers are actually endorsing Barbara's viewpoint as a valid justification for their actions. What am I saying? Enslave and torture a white male because he has inherent power over others? Of course they endorse that.

Firecracker's accusations are essentially true, they are wrong only in scale and details. Annie murdered her baby and Hughie cheered her on. They didn't even bother with some health-related reason like, "the V in my blood made it a horrible mutant and it couldn't survive," she just "wasn't ready." Bravura performance by what's left of Erin Moriarty, she's my new favorite character to hate.

Why did Hughie think V would cure his father of being brain dead, doesn't it mostly kill adults? Were its curative properties described elsewhere?

There were some compelling fan theories that Liberty was Homelander's mother. I guess that's out.
 
Nevertheless, we're supposed to believe he terrified everyone from infancy and that's why they enslaved and tortured him. (But also they were just following orders and thought he was so harmless they mocked him when he was a child.) I can't tell if the writers are actually endorsing Barbara's viewpoint as a valid justification for their actions. What am I saying? Enslave and torture a white male because he has inherent power over others? Of course they endorse that.
The problem is, they didn't create a weakness for him. Just that psychological conditioning, which makes no sense, since his life experiences might weaken that conditioning. Any villain with at least two brain cells to rub together would resist the urge to create a weapon or a monster without any weaknesses, because the risk of such things turning against their makers is too great.

It would've been more interesting if Homelander went back to that lab and thought he could laser everyone there, only for the scientists to use a keyword that causes him to go into seizure, or push a button that causes some implant in his head to fry his brain and put him into a deep sleep. Then they'd tie him down with restraints made to be strong enough to hold him while extracting his DNA to make another superman, and he'd have to fight his way out when he wakes up. Then he can have his revenge after destroying all their defenses, and he starts shoving them into ovens or lasering their dicks off after he's pulled out or shaken off whatever conditioning his makers use to keep him on a leash.

Also, why are the same doctors who worked on Homelander still all on the same lab? After the Homelander project was finished, wouldn't they be split up and reassigned to different projects? What the hell were they working on when Homelander popped by with that cake?

Firecracker's accusations are essentially true, they are wrong only in scale and details. Annie murdered her baby and Hughie cheered her on. They didn't even bother with some health-related reason like, "the V in my blood made it a horrible mutant and it couldn't survive," she just "wasn't ready." Bravura performance by what's left of Erin Moriarty, she's my new favorite character to hate.
Basically, Firecracker proved to the world that Starlight was a monster, and if there were any doubts, the sight of Starlight beating her to a pulp in live TV put any doubts to rest.

The fact that Hughie had no qualms about his baby being aborted behind his back shows that he's not a man. As if we needed more proof that he was a pussy-whipped chump.

Why did Hughie think V would cure his father of being brain dead, doesn't it mostly kill adults? Were its curative properties described elsewhere?
I think Soldier Boy and Stormfront got V as adults, and it worked out just fine. Hell, Stan Edgar put Stormfront on the Seven just to piss people off on purpose so they'd buy more Compound V.

But to be fair, it's capeshit science. It works the way the author wants it, consistency be damned. If the author wants V to heal someone, it will, and if the author wants V to fuck people up, that's what will happen, too.
 
Back
Top Bottom