Not sure where else to post this but I might as well post it here. Apologies if this is off-topic but it's been bugging me for a while.
Why aren't Abridged Series videos considered fair use? They're pretty obviously meant as a parody and isn't that considered fair use? I know that's a retarded and autistic question to ask, but I'm actually legit stumped on this one.
Parody is one of the few things that's still explicitly seen as fair use even in today's copyright landscape and always has been. I get why MST3K and Rifftrax aren't considered fair use, since that's just the original movies but with some guys cracking jokes or making dumb commentary.
But redubbing the entire dialogue in a fairly obviously joking sort of way would be a parody, wouldn't it?
I get that American copyright laws are especially draconian but even then, it's pretty obvious that a lot of these videos are meant as parody and in most cases, the people making them are pretty much doing it for free.
Weird Al only asks permission for his music parodies out of a sense of courtesy, legally he can do them without a license or permission.
Is it because of the fact that guys like Team Four Star are still using the original names of the characters and places? Then again, Robot Chicken pretty much does the same thing with copyrighted characters and IP's as parody and it's considered fair use (which is why they have the disclaimer at every episode)
Would someone just going full Ghost Stories and making a cut-and-paste gag dub totally unrelated to the source material be covered under fair use?