Boney
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2024
Right. They are using barrels appropriate for the caliber being fired.>5.56 barrel is more than twice as long as 300blk barrel
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right. They are using barrels appropriate for the caliber being fired.>5.56 barrel is more than twice as long as 300blk barrel
![]()
How is this confusing for you? Believe it or not I'm genuinely trying to help you.Right. They are using barrels appropriate for the caliber being fired.
Anything that is intended to intentionally harm or injure a trespasser is illegal: Spring guns attached to windows, animal traps that would injure someone stepping on them those are out. I would recommend a high fence around the property with non-injurious anti-climb barriers such as roller barriers, anti-climb paint or plastic spikes.How deep is the swamp? What sort of tools do we have available?
I'm thinking the terrain makes pungi traps under the water feasible as long as you can learn the terrain well enough not to fall into your own traps. The muddy soil might make traditional fortifications difficult but you could hypothetically dry mud into bricks if you could find a dry enough place to set up camp.
Edit: No boobytraps makes this more difficult, so forget the pungi. Maybe some log fortifications would work, sharpen one end and drive it into the mud, but it probably wouldn't withstand much.
Except the 5.56 is cheaper, with a flatter tragectory, lighter to carry, more readily available among peers, has more information put out on it, more optics with BDC options for it, and has more advanced ammo developed for it.
Update on passive scanning:There's an existing and expansive field of study of deterring crime through proper landscaping called CPTED.
There's also an opensource method of tracking local cellphone signals that might be used to alert you to intruders. This project is an example of something called a Cell Site Simulator, which sends out a signal that mimics cell-towers, so your phone automatically sends your data while trying to connect.
The above involves sending out EM signals to phreak your cellphone. That's probably not an issue, but I'd check locally, the government gets pissy about EM emissions in general, for whatever reason. Allegedly, there are also means of monitoring cell signals passively that are already in use for monitoring crowds in stadiums and the like. I had difficulty finding any information about this, or any opensource projects you might use for your own ends. If you'd like to research yourself, I believe this passive method may be known by several different names
- EM Scavenging
- Congestion Tracking
- Crowd Anomaly Estimation
I'm not gonna say to do this or not do this, but keep in mind that operating a Stingray or anything that can improperly use cell data is a crime, without a license. I'm not gonna tell anyone how to live their life (because I personally enjoy messing around with stuff), but you should be aware that operating things that can interfere with telecommunications is a felony and can get badges with guns at your door.Update on passive scanning:
Looks like there's an opensource SDR called HackRF One that some people are using as a digital analyzer. It has both active and passive modes, and was developed (from what I can tell) specifically for pentesting. It appears to be very similar to a different device called a Stingray, which is not opensource but comparatively more widespread.
All this only works if the bad guys are too dumb to leave their phones at home. But considering the caliber of your typical adversary, I'm not sure that it's best to completely ignore the concept.