- Joined
- Oct 9, 2018
Seems like a lot of people don't understand the difference between proof and evidence. See, this up here, it's evidence. It's not going to get styxgooberhummen locked up for life. None of it is even illegal. BUT, there are videos and screenshots that show that these events actually happened, and that's what makes it evidence. It's not just an anecdote with TRUST ME GUISE in place of evidence that indicates that these events actually happened. And most of it has no taint of cherry-picking or selective editing to suggest a certain narrative that might turn out later to be untrue.I mean, plenty of substance dropped to make anyone unsub who has even a rudimentary concept of propriety and decency. I haven’t watched this yoyo since the tiddy grabbing stream. I saw a thread on /pol/ about it and then came here and haven’t watch his shit since.
1. He abandoned his wife and child
2. He grabbed his new GF’s tiddies on a livestream TWICE
3. The voice recording that came out after he ended up Styxhexinslammer
4. The text message about needing a fucking guide in his own goddamn country but also commanding his mother to let this crazy hobo bish actually stay at Castle Warwick after she put him the clink.
Styx 100% groped Samantha in front of thousands of people, the video is irrefutable proof of that. The same video offers evidence that he was drunk at the time, due to his lurching, slurring, and lack of thought about how this might affect his audience. However, it's not proof of drunkeness, because he might have been high on something else, he might have been having a fucking seizure or a stroke, or any other host of unconvincing excuses that people make when they're trying to pretend they're not publicly drunk. The evidence of drunkeness falls short of being proof, but nevertheless most reasonable people would believe he's drunk in that video based on the evidence. I hope this helps some of you understand the difference between proof and evidence.
