Stormfront - /pol/ before /pol/

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
How to give your daughter Catholic schoolgirl syndrome but with Blacks 101:
Untitled.png

White supremacists like to push the narrative that they're the superior race, but seem to also be the worst example of whiteness out there.
I suspect it's because most of them have nothing to be proud of besides the skin they were born with.

There's some truth to the idea that Whites tend to be more successful than other races (except Asians and Jews) but from what I've seen the ones who obsess over that generally seem to be, uh, low quality humans. Many seem to be literally this:
whitepoop.png


I unironicly like storm front. But Niggermania is better. I think it is messed up La Raza and black panthers get treated like they are legitimately a group but stormfront gets treated as a joke. I mean some articals are just bad but it is nice to have an actual pro white site instead of non stop white guilt and sites praising colored people,

I would also love to see Storm front promote or make a white supremacist dating site. OK cupid bans you for knowing whites are superior (they are) and every other site worships groids amd promotes race mixing. I would like just one site that helps white men find other white men or even women that are both conservative , Republican, to meet and date but sites are made to discourage that, the first real Nazis where fine with gays as long as they did not act like fags. Rom was head of thr brown shirts and Adolf hitlers personal friend. They believed masculine gays that embraced manliness where fine . but Jewish propaganda warped that view and pornography has warped mens minds (I admit even myself was manipulated) but women are necessary but only for children and nurturing and nothing else. Only men know true love and honour and the purest love is between to men that embrace their masculine nature
The Black Panthers are a joke and Black supremacists ought to get the same stigma the White ones are getting, imo.
 
Last edited:
Even A&N usually aren't quite that antiquated sounding. He's rambling about Negroes like it's 1960.
 
How to give your daughter Catholic schoolgirl syndrome but with Blacks 101:
View attachment 1653239

I suspect it's because most of them have nothing to be proud of besides the skin they were born with.

There's some truth to the idea that Whites tend to be more successful than other races (except Asians and Jews) but from what I've seen the ones who obsess over that generally seem to be, uh, low quality humans. Many seem to be literally this:
View attachment 1653269



The Black Panthers are a joke and Black supremacists ought to get the same stigma the White ones are getting, imo.
Not enjoying sports is so important it MUST be said twice. Keep them away from the Football oh lawd.
 
Stormfronters cry about cultural appropriation like the extreme leftists they so hate:
Untitled.png
Untitled.png
Untitled.png
To be fair, a lot of people in the thread are speaking up against cultural appropriation ideology.

Not at all, thats like the most common thing in the world with latin american weaboos, every other spic with an anime avatar is an advocate for free helicopter rides and racist even when brown themselves
So do they consider themselves White or do they want to take the free helicopter rides themselves?

If you think white pride weeaboos are strange or a phenomenon, then you clearly haven't been to /v/ in the past few years.
Isn't /v/ mostly South Park republicans who say the n word? There's a big difference between that and a Stormfronter.
 
Last edited:
So do they consider themselves White or do they want to take the free helicopter rides themselves?

A lot of arguing about who's more mixed and who has the whitest grandfather. Just hating communism in general, which is a a good policy considering socialists history of destruction in latinamerica but it really doesn't benefit from the edgelord fedora sperging and self hating malinchismo.

i guess the niche just attracts people who are contratian to the status quo, in USA self hating fedora type autists rebel larping as commies. In latam were leftist populism is the status quo already they larp as a far right mismatch of banana fascism and libertarianism.
 
So do they consider themselves White or do they want to take the free helicopter rides themselves?
They're the types that think Pinochet and Peron did nothing wrong.

Isn't /v/ mostly South Park republicans who say the n word? There's a big difference between that and a Stormfronter.
South Park's spent the last four years constantly shitting on the Trump administration, meanwhile make a joke about the President on /v/ and you'll be met with soyboy wojaks, lefty/pol/ accusations, "left can't meme" accusations, and 20 variations on nigger, commie, and tranny. And r/the_donald was flat out a /pol/ op in order to bring redditors to 4chan because everyone else on the site hated their asses.
 
They're the types that think Pinochet and Peron did nothing wrong.


South Park's spent the last four years constantly shitting on the Trump administration, meanwhile make a joke about the President on /v/ and you'll be met with soyboy wojaks, lefty/pol/ accusations, "left can't meme" accusations, and 20 variations on nigger, commie, and tranny. And r/the_donald was flat out a /pol/ op in order to bring redditors to 4chan because everyone else on the site hated their asses.

I don't think Pinochet and Peron are remotely similar in policy or consequence. Pinochet, while a dictator, introduced economic policies that led to Chile eventually becoming the richest country in South America, while Peronism utterly broke Argentina to this day.

1603030172664.png

This is just embarrassing.

I would say that it's ridiculous for ancaps to cheer on Pinochet, though. He was an economic liberal, but he knew that the rule of law was important, unlike those idiots.
 
I don't think Pinochet and Peron are remotely similar in policy or consequence. Pinochet, while a dictator, introduced economic policies that led to Chile eventually becoming the richest country in South America, while Peronism utterly broke Argentina to this day.

View attachment 1670195

This is just embarrassing.

I would say that it's ridiculous for ancaps to cheer on Pinochet, though. He was an economic liberal, but he knew that the rule of law was important, unlike those idiots.
No I'm well aware of Pinochet's reign. He legitimately is the among the best dictators of the 20th century (the others probably being Tito, Xiaoping, Minh, Sankara, and Franco).

Pinochet still did something wrong though. He used Milton Friedman's proposals to improve his country beyond belief, but Friedman hated Pinochet's guts because he tortured and killed political dissidents to do it and that along with Lew Rockwell pandering to racists in the 80s killed libertarianism dead among the Left. It was especially insulting because the Libertarian Party's growth in the 1970s targeted SDS and New Left types who cared more about the social aspects than the Marxism.
 
No I'm well aware of Pinochet's reign. He legitimately is the among the best dictators of the 20th century (the others probably being Tito, Xiaoping, Minh, Sankara, and Franco).

Pinochet still did something wrong though. He used Milton Friedman's proposals to improve his country beyond belief, but Friedman hated Pinochet's guts because he tortured and killed political dissidents to do it and that along with Lew Rockwell pandering to racists in the 80s killed libertarianism dead among the Left. It was especially insulting because the Libertarian Party's growth in the 1970s targeted SDS and New Left types who cared more about the social aspects than the Marxism.
Pinochet wasn't a libertarian, though. He was an economically liberal autocrat, in the same way that the Brazilian junta led to the economic miracle for a few years, and he didn't care about what American libertarians thought. US libertarianism is fundamentally a non-functional ideology because it inevitably butts against the rule of law with restrictions on corporate scams and basic, necessary economic regulations like fishing restrictions to stop catastrophes like the north Atlantic cod collapse, which most voters value massively. The more pragmatic end of it (the Ron Pauls of the world) can draw some votes, but anything hinting at anarcho-capitalism turns the electorate off at once. Libertarianism was never going to be actually popular. It didn't even register in 1970s elections relative to Nixon and Carter.

Pinochet's main mistake from his perspective was holding a referendum on his rule and losing. His government came by coup and never had any actual popular mandate for his rule, so as soon as he held fair elections he was gone.
 
Back
Top Bottom