Something Awful and Friends - The roller-coaster train-wreck embarrassing downfall of a Web 1.0 giant and its tick offspring like from Cloverfield

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
"I bought the rights, not the liabilities" isn't a real thing and is exactly the argument Disney is using to not pay people who wrote under contract for Lucasfilm and Fox prior to their acquisition. Even they aren't going to be able to keep it up forever. Jeffrey doesn't have Disney's lawyers and it's ridiculous that he's even trying this.
 
"I bought the rights, not the liabilities" isn't a real thing and is exactly the argument Disney is using to not pay people who wrote under contract for Lucasfilm and Fox prior to their acquisition. Even they aren't going to be able to keep it up forever. Jeffrey doesn't have Disney's lawyers and it's ridiculous that he's even trying this.
Anyone who wrote on the front page is a cuck who would never sue them. They put up with LowT just laughing in their faces for years whenever they asked to be paid..
 
"I bought the rights, not the liabilities" isn't a real thing and is exactly the argument Disney is using to not pay people who wrote under contract for Lucasfilm and Fox prior to their acquisition. Even they aren't going to be able to keep it up forever. Jeffrey doesn't have Disney's lawyers and it's ridiculous that he's even trying this.

Sort of. As I understand it, it is not a defense in Disney's case as they bought IP & trademarks. Or another way of putting it, Disney didn't renegotiate contacts with their writer stable, they moved the contracts over from Lucasfilm/Fox. The true reason it won't work for Disney is they are playing fuck-fuck games and if the authors are able to able to actually hold out long enoughfor their case to get to court, Disney is going to get disassembled in court. The dissambly will be peanuts on their balance sheet though, and whole thing is just a power game: What Disney wants is the authors to grovel to the mouse and in exchange for their checks, sign new contracts written through Disney legal, removing whatever small amounts of rights to their works the authors currently have. But Disney owns not just the works written by the authors, but all the IP & right to make derivative works.
None of that is the case when you write for a blog, least of all SA's front page.


In Jeffery's case he just got the front page content, and does not 'own' the IP of the authors; Lowtax didn't get a cut of the Golan the Insatiable money when that was made into an animatedseries, despite the character debuting on the front page (Just like Lowtax never lets it not be known he didn't get any slenderman dollars). I haven't seen the contract the writers sign with Lowtax, but a lot of bloggers don't even have exclusivity clauses for their clickbait articles - you're never going to make more with it then the $40 & .01 per 1000-clicks, so it'd be redundant, so who cares if you publish it on your personal blog as well. SA paid for the right to publish the content, but the author still owns the copyright.

tl;dr, The content & context is different and the liability likely still rests with SA, LLC.

Also, daily reminder that Hamas, you know the literal terrorist organization that murders children and has gone to actual open war with Israel, had a Mickey Mouse rip off for their children's TV channel that they killed off after being visited by Disney's legal team. Let that sink in.
 
tl;dr, The content & context is different and the liability likely still rests with SA, LLC.
Which is probably just an alter ego of Richard Kyanka himself. It really doesn't matter. Those tax liens have priority over anything else. None of these clowns will ever see a dime.
 
So who is the more pathetic "web 2.0 superstar turned widely hated bitter old cuck"
Lowtax or Maddox?
I'd say LowT. Maddox at least has one good thing in his future, watching his old nemesis Maddax's downfall. He also isn't a wife beater or a deadbeat dad. They're both cucks, but LowT got cucked out of any hope for a future.
 
So who is the more pathetic "web 2.0 superstar turned widely hated bitter old cuck"
Lowtax or Maddox?
Maddox. People used to think Maddox was cool before he went on YouTube. He may own his site still but its not popular and no one can read that content today and think it’s good considering he wrote it.

Lowtax will at least OD within ten years, Maddox still has a long and boring life ahead of him.
 
Also, daily reminder that Hamas, you know the literal terrorist organization that murders children and has gone to actual open war with Israel, had a Mickey Mouse rip off for their children's TV channel that they killed off after being visited by Disney's legal team. Let that sink in.
Was it actually the legal team? I though they just killed off the main character for martyr points every season.
Pretty based show all things considered. I'd show it to my kids over goy shit like stephen universe or craig of the creek (IE: Craig's body is gonna be creek-ing from the rafters after he gets lynched for being a bitch ass nigga)
 
Well, whatever else you can say about Lowtax, he's never sued anyone for calling him a cuck.

he's never sued anyone for calling him a cuck YET.

Was it actually the legal team? I though they just killed off the main character for martyr points every season.
Pretty based show all things considered. I'd show it to my kids over goy shit like stephen universe or craig of the creek (IE: Craig's body is gonna be creek-ing from the rafters after he gets lynched for being a bitch ass nigga)

It was Disney's legal team. The whole point of Farfour was to subvert Mickey so that Mickey toys & products become Farfour/pro-infantada merchandize, as low quality bootlegs are a natural way of life for Arabs. They didn't realize the level that Disney zealously defended their trademarks; the story is that they promised to make Hamas' lives a living hell in discovery for damages since as a private corporation with zero morals, they could go after Hamas' financial network in ways Mossad & the US could only dream about. Hamas has a sprawling network worth hundreds of millions, possibly billions, through deals with Venezeulan and Afghan druglords mostly, and Disney had the means and connections to disrupt it; every 'donation' to their 'islamic charities' would be scrutinized, removing their ability to launder illicit cash. So Hamas bent the knee and had Farfour killed by the wiley Jews who wanted the deed to his family land.
 
It was Disney's legal team. The whole point of Farfour was to subvert Mickey so that Mickey toys & products become Farfour/pro-infantada merchandize, as low quality bootlegs are a natural way of life for Arabs. They didn't realize the level that Disney zealously defended their trademarks; the story is that they promised to make Hamas' lives a living hell in discovery for damages since as a private corporation with zero morals, they could go after Hamas' financial network in ways Mossad & the US could only dream about. Hamas has a sprawling network worth hundreds of millions, possibly billions, through deals with Venezeulan and Afghan druglords mostly, and Disney had the means and connections to disrupt it; every 'donation' to their 'islamic charities' would be scrutinized, removing their ability to launder illicit cash. So Hamas bent the knee and had Farfour killed by the wiley Jews who wanted the deed to his family land.
If you have any links to this, I'd be very interested.
 
If you have any links to this, I'd be very interested.

I'm trying to find some better sources, but its all a lot of read between the lines:


"Information Minister Mustafa Barghouti said the character — a giant black-and-white rodent with a high-pitched voice — represented a “mistaken approach” to the Palestinian struggle against Israeli occupation."

Farfour was then replaced by someone in a bee costume. So the "mistaken approach" was clearly not using actors in fursuits to teach children to kill the jews.
 
So who is the more pathetic "web 2.0 superstar turned widely hated bitter old cuck"
Lowtax or Maddox?
I'd say LowT, because Maddox's stupid behavior only affected Maddox. Look at the grief he caused to Ashli, his three kids, his old 70 y/o cancer bag of a mommy who's still cleaning up her middle aged son's literal and metaphorical messes, not to mention the money.

All that heartache and impoverishment just so he could jerk off on some skank's feet.
 
I think I have found the saddest banner ad in a long time on today's visit to the ruins of Something Awful.

sa_stickers.gif


You can buy them here, in a collection that includes smash hits like
sa_stickers3.jpg

and
sa_stickers4.jpg

or the classics:
sa_stickers6.jpg


Goon made! Step right up, goon Sir (and the L-Ladies can come, too!)
 
I think I have found the saddest banner ad in a long time on today's visit to the ruins of Something Awful.

View attachment 1969438

You can buy them here, in a collection that includes smash hits like
View attachment 1969443
and
View attachment 1969444
or the classics:
View attachment 1969445

Goon made! Step right up, goon Sir (and the L-Ladies can come, too!)
That garbage is something I can see a 14 year old trapped in the whole fashion punk thing thinks is cool. No wonder a goon thought it up because they're eternally 14 in maturity and mentality.
 
Back
Top Bottom