Something Awful and Friends - The roller-coaster train-wreck embarrassing downfall of a Web 1.0 giant and its tick offspring like from Cloverfield

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Letting a baby drink something that is hell on adult systems let alone an infant's VS. leaving a 6 year old in the care of a sexual deviant with a known infantilism fetish.

I can't decide which family Lowtox is failing as a father more, New Family or Old Family?
 
Ghostse said:
Letting a baby drink something that is hell on adult systems let alone an infant's VS. leaving a 6 year old in the care of a sexual deviant with a known infantilism fetish.

I can't decide which family Lowtox is failing as a father more, New Family or Old Family?
Click to expand...
He's fucking with you, he drank it himself and then poured water in.

Also, fucking hell Lowtax, if you are going bankrupt don't have kids.
 
He already let his kids have “special alone secret playtime” with Shmorky, letting them have energy drinks is the least of their worries.
 
Lowtax would probably be funnier if he had a job, he'd have daily experiences with people outside his house to give him something to complain about.
 
BlueSpark said:
Lowtax has always claimed that he never left his kids alone with Shmorky.
Click to expand...
He also claimed not to have a huge unpaid tax bill, that he didn't have a pill addiction, that radium lost his admin star during a house move, that hosting cost thousands and thousands of dollars a month and that it was logistically too hard to mail out key-rings.
 
Two more people permanently banned for suggesting that the Moore controversy should involve a discussion of the evidence and being at least slightly critical of the accusations. The core idea that a crime should be investigated.

It's funny how strong the response is when the subject is a Republican politician. People are fawning over themselves to defend Louis CK or George Takei over there but when you broach on the topic of TRUMP the broken brains come out.
 
polonium said:
He also claimed not to have a huge unpaid tax bill, that he didn't have a pill addiction, that radium lost his admin star during a house move, that hosting cost thousands and thousands of dollars a month and that it was logistically too hard to mail out key-rings.
Click to expand...
He also claimed he knows how to manage a website and that he is funny.
 
are they really defending louis and george? really louis i will admit had the best response he fucking owned what he did and even said he thought it was okay cause he asked before he did it.

The moore thing is fucking gross but seeing as how he is a politician asking for proof would be a rather normal thing.
 
northstar747 said:
are they really defending louis and george? really louis i will admit had the best response he fucking owned what he did and even said he thought it was okay cause he asked before he did it.

The moore thing is fucking gross but seeing as how he is a politician asking for proof would be a rather normal thing.
Click to expand...

I mean, I'll defend Louis. The issue is that the moderation is being incredibly selective. Weirdly enough the crying hillaryman mod will not tolerate anything except explicit condemnation of one specific accused sex offender. Weirdly enough it's a republican politician.

It's an extension of the bias that causes people to get banned when they question the idea of using violence to stop political speech if the victim was a Nazi while freely allowing people to demonize anyone that uses violence to stop political speech from Antifa.

Pedophilia is disgusting, if Moore did any of that at all he is a monster. However using the word "if" would be seen as an attack against the moderator's ideology and beliefs instead of what it actually is, a two letter word to introduce a conditional clause. You are in the realm of the emotions of the moderator so there is no room for discussion.

It's the argument a lot of us here have that the moderation on SA is terrible because of how they are punishing opinions they disagree with to change the discussion instead of just moderating it. It isn't even about the concepts or ideas presented it's about the personal politics of the moderators because they have the power to push them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom