Judging by the only line of dialogue I remember from him in across the spiderverse. Someone told him something about helping civilians or something and he replied "I will, but not because you told me to" That one line told me everything I needed to know about the character.
this is because a lot of these people weren't socialized as children properly and don't know how to "play" with others.
Wait, I thought the character's punk philosophy was meant to be a joke. You're telling me the writers were serious?
Ha, whenever they write something as blatant as this, they're serious. He's a jerk and people (left-wing Tumblrites) loved him because "anarchy."
the movie was made by Sony and the previous director for the first movie supported Antifa so
![:\](/styles/custom/emotes/svg/chris-confused.svg "Confused :\")
Ah, so he's getting the G.I. Robot treatment.
What's next, her meeting Professor X and Daredevil?
At the very least, Pavitr was meant to serve as the overconfident newcomer who hasn't experienced the stress of being a hero.
So am I the moron for not getting that it wasn't a joke or are they the morons for expecting me to take it seriously?the movie was made by Sony and the previous director for the first movie supported Antifa so
If the art and tattoo on the arm didn't give it away it's the third photo where the cat looks utterly terrified. They probably pet the cat all the time even when it just wants to be left alone but somehow can't clean it?We do get a hand pic:
And how is this supposed to stop the "genocide" in Gaza?
The most threatening leftist:
Yada yada, where's the "this fictional character I like agrees with my political/current thing position!!" image when you need it?
They just hope it inspires someone else to do what these people don't have the balls to do.
Not the best thread to ask this but why does the absence of a father results in cases like this consistently? And why is fatherlessness seemingly becoming an epidemic? I've seen many people saying this and i want to know more.
Fathers are important because they provide the hard boundaries and protections that Mothers lack, as well as the hard guides for children to look up-to in their first years. I blame a lot of this madness on the Free Love/You don't need no man to be happy side of the aisle, as well as the destabilization and repeated external and internal fracturing of the Faith, which originally did provide that moral guidance for those that may have lacked fathers in the past.
Why did they draw this guy like he suffers from cankles? It just looks annoyingly wrong.
Why is this seen as a legit argument with some people? Even if said fictional character was real, why would their opinion matter? Like "Luffy would totally beat up ICE agents" and? I'm pretty sure Luffy would also beat up the cartels and thus prevent the main reason why people leave their countries. Regardless, the character is not real, so who cares?Yada yada, where's the "this fictional character I like agrees with my political/current thing position!!" image when you need it?
