Commercialization of fandom. I remember those days, too. Tom Hiddleston just aged and no one talks about him anymore, and Sherlock's fandom hangs on by sheer size. Those fans moved on to Our Flag Means Death, and before that, Good Omens. You can actually predict when they will abandon a fandom for another.
>Name the art style
Tell me you have he/they in your bio without telling me you have he/they in your bio.
it's something built in inherently with leftism and jewish people. they absolutely hate beauty and want to see it destroyed.
Sounds like the plot of a Greek tragicomedy of sorts.
Kind of reminds me of the Uglies from the Judge Dredd comics. People who voluntarily mutilate themselves do to a fashion trend.
i think the daisy and luigi one would look nicer if it was edited a bit
The blue and pink flag? Well, only 41% of the time.
It's awkward teenage girls who are either uncomfortable by the fact that they're not classically beautiful themselves and revel in ugliness as a cope, or they're uncomfortable at how grown men sexualise them when they're still too young to want sex, so they don't want to be beautiful. You saw it with goth and punk kids and a lot of youth subcultures back in the day, deliberately making themselves look "scary" or rejecting beauty norms to repel the normies and attract their own in-crowd.
Because selective realism. They want all the simple and cute but otherhand making "real women" is popular and real women have imperfections. So you pick few that you like the best and make them stand out. Strech marks are nice because you can add them at the end almost anywhere and they used to be so rarely potrayed that it signs as a member of the good guys better than many others. Also they aren't traditionally considered to be funny like a big nose or bad hair do.
Dudes get stretch marks too but I don't think I've ever seen any art depicting that.
Oh it's definitely out there somewhere
ftms don't count
Try fat fetish art, or "inclusive" pieces that were clearly drawn one handed.
About that comic, she needs a reality check. To most people the writer is just a meaningless stranger, like most of the humanity. We have no ill will towards you, we just aren't willing to sacrifice our wellbeing for yours. Sucks that they are sick but public life is for others too. Even assuming that pandic actions like masks are super helpful towards the weak, they aren't free of downsides in any way. Depression from isolation, trash, price of inconvenience, breathing problems in masks, lowering social skills, less opportunities to exercise or otherwise challenge yourself, many people not doing their best job from home office... When we take all that into account and yes, the best practice is to isolate the weak rather every one else.
What does he even mean by "biblically accurate?" That doesn't even make any sense.
