A thing i've seen for a long time is the fact that most porn artists don't know how clothes work. Most of the time everything they do is extremely skin tight with no mass or detail, always making sure of revealing every single detail of their body. I get that they want to do sexy clothing but there is a way to do it properly.
To be fair, that's also a hallmark of beginner artists, too. One of the fundamentals most artists learn very on is the human form- how the joints fit together, where everything is, what the proportions are, and stuff like that. And when drawing people (even clothed,) the construction lines and early sketches very often will be of just the body, since that informs how the clothing will be drawn (as opposed to the other way around.) Especially with dresses- you need to at least have an idea of what that body is doing underneath so you can properly represent that motion through the dress. All this to say that there's a huge emphasis on the body itself when first starting with art, and comparatively less on clothing, folds, how fabric sits on the body, etc, so a lot of beginner artists default to clothing being basically an outer layer of skin.
What most people do is draw the body first, then the clothes on top of it, and erase the necessary parts. Not everyone knows what to erase, let alone how to draw wrinkles. Shit I still don't know how to lol.
I will say it's true, but still a lot of these people really go for the "so tight you can see the bellybutton beneath" kind of clothes, be it with swimsuits or other kind of tight fitting clothes. The same would apply to the chest in many cases.
Meanwhile i'm a tryhard. It's the main reason why i try to practise clothing wrinkles but also why i made clothing by layers.
Not to go all "it's they culcha" but that literally is just that studio's style. Go rewatch the first season of TDI, they've been drawing like that for over a decade now. I think what it is, is echoes of the 90s/Y2K revival of the old UPA style, where everything was geometric and flat with lines and color blocking over forms rather than curving with the 3D figure.
I've found that if you do a bare minimum one wrinkle/fold in the elbow/knee, or one line across the torso under the breast/highest point of the pectorals, that satisfies the clothing fold need for most viewers. It depends on how stylized you're going, obviously, but in most cartoons you can get away with a fair deal of simplification as long as you have an idea of what you're trying to convey with it. Thinner fabrics fold a million times before thick ones creases even once.
Not to burst your bubble, but the joke is that I'm making fun of Spider Bitch's argument that cartoon physics = fetish art (And of the fact that as she calls fat fetishists gooner weirdos, she weirdly has a lot of experience with fat art and knows where to get it at a moment's notice). I was being sarcastic.
This is about how I judge it too, yes
;w;" oh, my bad lol
It's fine, I even typed it like "Maybe the joke's kinda unclear", lol
Lol I don’t understand this retardation, if pronouns don’t indicate gender then what exactly do they indicate? Why are they so obsessed with labels while also believing that none of them actually mean anything?
Literally just what feels good. And this isn't me being sarcastic or sassy, this is the actual unironic explination I have heard from multiple genderspecials.
Why do we do anything? What reason is there to make any art? People do just enjoy redesigning characters and making them more human. Yea they left the identifying things but they left the hair the same too, that's just because they want it to be recognisable as that character. You know people have fetishes for plushes too right? That sort of seam and squishy hands is also someone's fetish. Same for being blinded with the eyepatch. Just because something is lewd it doesn't mean it's porn. Women have boobs, you can't draw a woman and not include the boobs. This image just reads as something the artist finds attractive not as porn. It's like someone drawing blondes, it's not a fetish and it's not porn, that's just their tastes in women.
Here are the reddit posts. 1. 2. 3. Can't find the exact post for the third one but there's several of that comic without the +reunion after story parts.
THE KING HAS ARRIVED
Why is korean art so unholy?
If it wasn't because the name of that unholy abomination is Boris i would have a hard time guessing if it was a really ugly woman or a terribly fat guy. After all, what kind of fatass has tits like those?
I might have toxoplasmosis from Mewgenics, but any time the name Boris comes up I think of the bloated dead cat sewer boss and/or the most hairy bear of a Russian man. I also read those breasts as shoulders, what a fool I am.
Boris got some bitch-tits.
