Opinion Shy Conservatives Keep the Left in Its Bubble - Otherwise reasonable people believe crazy things because nobody dares challenge them.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article/Archive

A couple of days after the election, a closeted Republican friend sent me a compendium of messages and social-media posts he had gathered from some of his left-of-center colleagues. They were utterly wild.

One insisted that while all of us needed space to “grieve,” we had only a few months to prepare for “solidly authoritarian rule.” Another was looking for open university positions overseas in her specialty, since she couldn’t come to terms with living in a country “that hates so many of us,” where “half of us are denied the highest leadership position purely because of our gender.

A Massachusetts resident asserted that “my rights as a woman are about to be compromised.” A man sarcastically congratulated his fellow Americans for voting for four more years of “fascist ideology,” “blatant misogyny and racism,” “toxic masculinity” and “spiritual bankruptcy.” A woman wrote late on election eve that while she didn’t exactly want to die, “it’s just that I don’t care if I don’t wake up” on Nov. 6.

Nonleftists wonder if fears such as these are sincerely held or merely performative. After all, while one could have plenty of reasonable doubts about a second Trump administration, the fear that we are in for a resurgence of fascist authoritarianism, that America voted against Kamala Harris because it couldn’t countenance a female president rather than due to her singular weaknesses as a candidate, and that Massachusetts is going to restrict abortion aren’t among them.

Yet as unrealistic as these fears are, they seem to reflect the sincere beliefs of at least some otherwise reasonable people. How can that be?

Right-leaning commentators regularly zero in on one key reason: the echo chamber of the media and the Democratic Party. The Harris campaign parlayed Donald Trump’s quips about being “a dictator on day one”—i.e., issuing lots of executive orders, as other new presidents have also done—into alarms about the return of fascism. Mainstream journalists insisted that Mr. Trump must have intended to echo a pro-Nazi gathering in 1939 when he chose Madison Square Garden, site of the 1992 Democratic National Convention, for a rally. Oprah Winfrey suggested that if Americans didn’t elect Kamala Harris president, they may lose the right to vote.

But there is another reason, one that conservatives are far less likely to mention, since it implicates them. One thing the election results proved beyond a doubt is that Americans with conservative views are everywhere—in every city, every state and every demographic group, far more than we knew. But the shock of the election results demonstrated how many Americans are willing to vote their values at the ballot box even as they remain unwilling to explain that vote even to a pollster, much less to a friend. Particularly inside elite government, business and academic enclaves, where the darkest fears about Mr. Trump have been incubated, Americans with right-of-center views tend to keep those views to themselves.

It’s easy enough to understand why. In recent decades, and particularly since 2020, the numerous examples of careers ended by touching one of our nation’s constantly moving political tripwires have led many to believe they need to choose between sincerity and friendships, between advancing their values and supporting their family, between an opinion and a job.

The electric fence of cancel culture creates a tendency toward self-censorship among the (real or perceived) minority, which leads those who belong to the dominant culture to assume that no reasonable person holds views different from their own. After all (so they think), they don’t know anyone who does.

All this came to mind when I read those hysterical social-media messages. I think of how much these genuinely frightened friends and colleagues could benefit from knowing that there are people they like, people they trust, who have a different take on things, who might be able to reassure their friends and neighbors that their fears are unrealistic and exaggerated—that the country will still exist in four years and it will still be the United States of America.

For those who are shy about dissenting, I understand the risk you would assume by speaking, even to close friends from whom you’ve hidden your true beliefs. But I believe you should do it anyway. I think that cancel culture is receding and that you’ll find the water warmer than you expect, but I can’t guarantee that. What I know for sure is that for as long as America remains a self-censoring society, it will also remain an extreme, polarized and deeply unhealthy one. All of us have a part to play in repairing it.
 
Yeah, you're right. Hillary and Harris were both shot down because they are women and not because they are unlikable, untrustworthy, unqualified. Nope, just because of their sex organs and/or skin.
 
But there is another reason, one that conservatives are far less likely to mention, since it implicates them. One thing the election results proved beyond a doubt is that Americans with conservative views are everywhere—in every city, every state and every demographic group, far more than we knew. But the shock of the election results demonstrated how many Americans are willing to vote their values at the ballot box even as they remain unwilling to explain that vote even to a pollster, much less to a friend. Particularly inside elite government, business and academic enclaves, where the darkest fears about Mr. Trump have been incubated, Americans with right-of-center views tend to keep those views to themselves.
What is it the left is so fond of saying? "It's not my job to educate you."

Nigga leftists breaks friendships and the bonds of family when they find out someone has a case of wrongthink. People didn't tell the author of this article the truth because the author is a fucking schizo that would try to destroy their friends or family over a difference of opinion. You can't discuss anything with leftists because they refuse to accept that other people can have differing opinions. The author is telling on themselves when they say the people around them refused to tell them what they actually thought.
 
That "shyness" is a direct byproduct of being jumped by the media and activists if you stepped out of line.

The deluded left imagines discourse with the opposition as polite arguments over coffee instead of what it really is - being aggressively canceled if you disagree, with "arguments" being mostly artificial and topical over what color label to put on the bottle of tranny juice, not if giving kids tranny juice in the first place is a good idea. They operate on the idea that history is over, the science (tm) is settled, and the only thing you CAN debate is how grateful you should feel to finally live in Utopia. Their Utopia.

The popular vote win of Trump really woke up a lot of dem-prog people who've been living in a self-reinforced bubble for the last 16 years that everyone pretty much was on their side because they'd put everyone who wasn't on "mute" or "block" and assumed the artificial silence from the other side meant they'd all left the country, or died off, or whatever... surely they weren't still around....
 
Last edited:
But there is another reason, one that conservatives are far less likely to mention, since it implicates them. One thing the election results proved beyond a doubt is that Americans with conservative views are everywhere—in every city, every state and every demographic group, far more than we knew. But the shock of the election results demonstrated how many Americans are willing to vote their values at the ballot box even as they remain unwilling to explain that vote even to a pollster, much less to a friend. Particularly inside elite government, business and academic enclaves, where the darkest fears about Mr. Trump have been incubated, Americans with right-of-center views tend to keep those views to themselves.

It’s easy enough to understand why. In recent decades, and particularly since 2020, the numerous examples of careers ended by touching one of our nation’s constantly moving political tripwires have led many to believe they need to choose between sincerity and friendships, between advancing their values and supporting their family, between an opinion and a job.

Just look at the open source community currently for these very types of fears first hand! Or a place like reddit, where having a national majority opinion on any number of trans issues will get you banned for expressing them in even a wrongthink sub.

The left excels at projecting and concentrating manufactured outrage into what appears to be a morally/ethically openly unquestionable position. They then use everyone else's paralysis to crucify the few people refusing to give in. As a warning. When you fight back, you are the asshole. They are the ultimate user, abuser and weaponizer of "niceties".
 
Last edited:
It's not about being shy. Believe it or not there are still some people that find it in bad taste to discuss politics at work, at the dinner table, on dates, etc. Back when that was the norm, people were friends no matter what political side they were on, before people wore their politics on their sleeves and made it their entire personality. I supported Trump since 2016, but even then I always felt the people proudly wearing MAGA hats and flying Trump flags from their trucks was tacky and just as "NOTICE ME NOTICE ME!" as the libtards with multicolored hair they hate so much.
Don't get me wrong, I can't stand those types either, but I don't feel the need to broadcast it. You'll probably piece together my political alignment soon enough anyway through conversation, no need to stamp it on my forehead.
 
But there is another reason, one that conservatives are far less likely to mention, since it implicates them.
But its not just conservatives, its common views held by the middle. The centrists despise child mutilation, outdated immigration policies, and the current state of affairs as well. You didn't just build a wall to kick out the conservatives from speaking up; it was every single person who told you that Todd competing in the Woman's Sports was taking this acceptance thing a little too far. Screaming 'right side of history' doesn't move those who aren't hardcore extremists, and alienates everyone else. These are the fruits of your harvest, enjoy them.
 
We have a much bigger problem here than just people being "shy."

“Transphobia is child abuse,” Alex Roque, who runs the Ali Forney Center for homeless LGBTQ youth in New York City, asserted on a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) webinar last fall.
In less than three minutes, he cast a vision for completely transforming child protective systems nationwide. Family rejection of a child’s gender identity cannot be dismissed as a personal view, he argued. Non-affirmation must be treated as abuse. “If they were denying them food or denying them access to school or denying other things, there would be headlines,” Roque continued. “There would be prosecution.”
Once LGBT youth are identified, the Youth Acceptance Project (YAP) can be implemented to persuade hesitant parents to affirm their child’s gender dysphoria.

In an overview of YAP, the program’s creator, the California-based nonprofit Family Builders, touts the “success” story of a family who became involved with the system because they “struggled to accept their child as a transgender girl.”

“After several months of work, there were significant improvements,” the document states. “The father consented to gender affirming medical care for Salima. The father gave Salima a purse for her birthday. And the father once helped Salima put on a wig.”

The program is designed to help parents and caregivers of children already in the welfare system, or “at risk” of entering, become affirming, according to the AFFIRM.ME guide. The program also pushes families to “reconcile” their values, including their faith, to accept their child’s identity.

Many caregivers are referred to the program because they are “not allowing their youth to express themselves fully in public (hairstyles, clothing, hygiene/ beauty products)” or resist using preferred pronouns and names, according to the Family Builders overview.


YAP is currently being implemented in California, New York, Pennsylvania and Missouri, along with Ohio, according to the SOGIE Center. Of the 34 Cuyahoga County families who started the program between 2018 and 2021, seven cases were successfully “closed” when parents stopped opposing their child’s gender-bending desires, according to SOGIE Center data.

“I mean, they don’t say anything to my face anymore about it and they stopped being super religious around me because they used to,” said one young person who was part of the program in Spring 2021, according to the data sheet. “I don’t know what was their problem, but they used to try to push a lot of weird religion stuff on me.”

Another adolescent reported having a “very conservative” family approve of transitioning after going through YAP. “So I could start testosterone and things of that sort soon,” the youth said. “And [mom is] helping me with the name change.”

Also smug "LGB lose the TQ" homos you are on notice: this all started with the deliberate and strategic destruction of Brendan Eich.
 
Surprise, nobody wants to talk screeching retards out of their delusions, unless said retards are wearing a straitjacket.
"The Left" has grown very accustomed to forcing people to humor their delusions, troons being the most obvious issue.

No sane person, without outside prompting, would come to the conclusion that a gross faggot in a dress is actually a pretty princess.
Normal people are utterly disgusted by troons, and rightfully so.
It takes heavy and sustained indoctrination and pressure to "normalize" such obvious falsehoods, or rather, suppress dissent against them.

War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Diversity is our strength.
Transwomen are women.
Israel is our greatest ally!

They failed. They may get people to say "two plus two equals five", but they failed to make them actually believe it.
 
Last edited:
There's very little use in talking to people on the "progressive" left that just listens to whatever the MSM spoonfeeds them about Trump, and the right. My boomer mom is still on the Russian bullshit from all the way back in 2016. I love my mom very much, but she's about as politically aware and sensible as your average 60+ year old boomer democrat white woman. Thankfully she isn't full TDS, she just sees him as a bufoon, and doesn't really believe in the whole "nazi" shit.

I mean lets be real here. If you're talking to someone that unironically goes "Trump is a nazi" what the fuck are you going to say that even matters? Someone that spouts that nonense is extremely politcally naive, and probably just thinks National Socialism means "being very racist, and hate gay people." These are the same type of people that if they see any opinion or information that's doesn't have a heavily left leaning bias they immeditely block it or refuse to even look at it. At best they look it up, see a single snopes article going "deboonked," and go about their day assured about how right they are.

Leftists aren't freaking out because conservatives aren't spending time talking to them. I see plenty of that everywhere. They're freaking out because they self isolate inside soy filled echo chambers to the point they live in a world where Kamala had a 0% chance of losing.

I would say everyone on this forum that supported Trump believed he could've lost 2024 via fraud or doomerism about how many people are liberal. The people on the left truly believed Kamla was going to win no questions asked. We still have cope to this very day of people going "its not over! He hasn't been certified yet! Here's how Kamala can still win!"

I don't care how smart you are, or how well informed your talking points are. You cannot get through to someone if they won't let you. People have to dig out of their delusions themselves, or get left behind.
 
Last edited:
Leftists purged everyone who disagreed with them on the belief that if they all clapped their hands and believed hard enough that they would always win no matter what.

Now that this isn't working anymore, it's our fault for not being good little cuckservatives and stopping our enemies while they make mistakes.

I believe that if you see something is falling, you should give it a push.
 
Only the modern left could finally realize that they're fucking crazy and still score a perfect 10 in mental gymnastics finding a way to blame their political opponents for it.
 
It is not worth arguing with these faggots. They will parrot whom they view as better in their SJW nonsense ad naseum.
Let them eat cake.
 
There's no point talking to people because half of what is considered 'political' these days is, IMGO, psychological. People are having personal, emotional reactions to politics and you cannot talk to them about it anymore than you can explain the benefits of spiders to an arachnophobe.
I don't like saying this because it sounds too much like 'my political opponents are all insane crackpots', but I think a lot of the behaviour of the left can be explained by people seeking psychological sanctuary from an unhealthy society. In a healthier society they would still be leftists, but they wouldn't have a personal investment in politics and they wouldn't hyperfixate on idpol shit, especially idpol shit that affects a tiny percentage of people in the country.
 
I was under the impression we'd agreed in the west talking religion never ended well.

Wokism is a religion and there is about as much chance talking round a devout Wokist as there is a Muslim.

I don't hop on Instagram and tell Catholics their bread isn't a carpenter, why would I go on Bluesky and tell Wokists that the straight white demons aren't the reason they didn't get promoted?
 
I’m sorry, but the insane left spend years trying to rob people of their livelihoods for so much as breathing a word against them and now it’s our fault for being shy?
I know I’ve said it before but every technique they have is right out of the abusive/manipulative partner handbook.
Look what you made me do
 
There's no point talking to people because half of what is considered 'political' these days is, IMGO, psychological. People are having personal, emotional reactions to politics and you cannot talk to them about it anymore than you can explain the benefits of spiders to an arachnophobe.
I don't like saying this because it sounds too much like 'my political opponents are all insane crackpots', but I think a lot of the behaviour of the left can be explained by people seeking psychological sanctuary from an unhealthy society. In a healthier society they would still be leftists, but they wouldn't have a personal investment in politics and they wouldn't hyperfixate on idpol shit, especially idpol shit that affects a tiny percentage of people in the country.
A lot of that falls back to Saul Alinsky advocating leftists behave like schizophrenic psychopaths to get what they want politically. Both Barack Obama and Bill Clinton found Alinsky inspirational. Although there were leftists that behaved like psychopaths before, Alinsky solidified the idea.
 
Back
Top Bottom