Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
EQ6tGPCUcAEigik.jpeg
 
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
@Shane_Yes_That_One
Even when you aren't here, you prove to us how much of an insipid buffoon you really are.
Apparently, the "Ronversations" motivated you to reclaim the title as the stupidest person in the room.
Also, congrats on graduating from the Scott Steiner School of Mathematics!
However, you get no simpy from me!
Click to expand...
Now you made me think if Shane knows who Scott Steiner is. Will he go and say "Let me just google that."?
 
OneHandClapping said:
Shane's so out of touch he thinks what Vic asked the little girl, in front of her parents, hundreds of people, and cameras, is some kind of pedophilic proposition.
Click to expand...

They sure do love coming back to that. In the video, it is painfully obvious that Vic isn't being serious about what he's saying. The fact that no one has complained about Vic propositioning a child after all these years is astonishing to think about, if that was the case. But it isn't. No one complained about it because everyone knew it wasn't a proposition. Shane and his pals are a bunch of morons to keep up this narrative.
 
OneHandClapping said:
Shane's so out of touch he thinks what Vic asked the little girl, in front of her parents, hundreds of people, and cameras, is some kind of pedophilic proposition.
Click to expand...
Because for @Shane_Yes_That_One it absolutely is. Though it is funny he's acting so upset about it.

Just waiting for the Tweets to come from that him that he wanted to "help" Vic "get better." Which we all know means he wanted to DM Vic to say he's supposed to wait until she's 14, like a good male feminist (or whatever bullshit label Shane self-applies).
 
I've been reading his tweets in a teenage girl's voice because that's what the tone of his words sound like. Think I'm starting to understand how he was able to "sweet talk" his wife into marrying him, he had to learn to talk like her.
 
GenericReviewerDraco said:
Shoeboy finally hit 500 pages. Holy fuck, how can one irrelevant dude white knighting for hamplanets be this exceptional?
Click to expand...
This is what he wanted, this is what he asked for.

On the TUG thing, if you're running a background on someone and they are a "legal" couple, their address will show the same as their partner's for whichever is the longest. I.E. Husband has lived somewhere for 6 years and wife moved in only two years ago, you'll see her as living there 6 years. You need to run her separately on her maiden name. Os so I've heard. 😏
 
Not A Bug said:
This is what he wanted, this is what he asked for.

On the TUG thing, if you're running a background on someone and they are a "legal" couple, their address will show the same as their partner's for whichever is the longest. I.E. Husband has lived somewhere for 6 years and wife moved in only two years ago, you'll see her as living there 6 years. You need to run her separately on her maiden name. Os so I've heard. 😏
Click to expand...

Knew something had to be off if Shane was saying it.
 
Not A Bug said:
This is what he wanted, this is what he asked for.

On the TUG thing, if you're running a background on someone and they are a "legal" couple, their address will show the same as their partner's for whichever is the longest. I.E. Husband has lived somewhere for 6 years and wife moved in only two years ago, you'll see her as living there 6 years. You need to run her separately on her maiden name. Os so I've heard. 😏
Click to expand...
Shane cant do proper research and basic math is a mystery to him anyway. So we can conlude he is a moron.
 
Not A Bug said:
This is what he wanted, this is what he asked for.

On the TUG thing, if you're running a background on someone and they are a "legal" couple, their address will show the same as their partner's for whichever is the longest. I.E. Husband has lived somewhere for 6 years and wife moved in only two years ago, you'll see her as living there 6 years. You need to run her separately on her maiden name. Os so I've heard. 😏
Click to expand...

You should never take these free online search things seriously. They are full of erroneous or misleading information. Sometimes it's just straight up wrong and sometimes it's just collected in a way that makes it confusing. Most of their databases are just full of huge data dumps from who the fuck knows where with absolutely no cross checking or vetting.
 
AnOminous said:
You should never take these free online search things seriously. They are full of erroneous or misleading information. Sometimes it's just straight up wrong and sometimes it's just collected in a way that makes it confusing. Most of their databases are just full of huge data dumps from who the fuck knows where with absolutely no cross checking or vetting.
Click to expand...

Much like Shane's brain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom