Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Here you go Shame you got a response (i don't think this was posted during the sperg spree or movement of posts)
1561525340088.png
https://twitter.com/NickRekieta/status/1143722092921331713 http://archive.is/XPtDf
 
Probably sad because his boyfriend is no longer speaking with him, if Casey stoped Ron from tweeting (Finally) he probably also told him to stop communicating with Shame.

What we see here is the transition from denial to anger, in the five stages of grief.
Would Bargaining be trying to get onto Nick's stream hoping he can get Nick to spill docs and info now that his lover can't do it?
 
I was going to say that I was blessed to not see Shane's new avatar, but of course that happened to be the one Nick screencapped when he called out Casey. *sigh*
 
I can't help but notice that Shane cnstantly mentions that Vic was "willing" to admit to all these misdeeds but never says that he actually did admit to anything. Good luck trying to leverage that into anything when it can just as easily be claimed that Vic was acting under duress. "Hmmm, nice con schedule you have this year Vic....it would be a shame if anything happened to it!"
 
I think Shame is the defeater to quantum superposition. He is stupid when observed and still stupid when unobserved.

Edit to add: Take that Schrödinger.
Shane is not only stupid when observed, observers are made stupid through the act of observation. Yet Shane remains at the same level of stupidity.
His existence violates the conservation of stupidity.
 
Shane is not only stupid when observed, observers are made stupid through the act of observation. Yet Shane remains at the same level of stupidity.
His existence violates the conservation of stupidity.
Guess we'll have to come up with a theory of special stupidity to counterpart the theory of general stupidity.
 
Or propose a mechanism through which Shane converts shoes into stupidity.
Every time a Shane eats a pair of shoes, there is an infinitesimal chance that one of the shoes escapes his grasp and is consumed by the dog. This separation of mirrored shoe pairs releases particles of stupidity that increase the density of the local stupidity field, with the highest density of particles remaining close to the source of emission. Immersion in this field causes an exponential decrease in higher brain functions as the particle density increases. I call this particle field Holmberg Radiation.
 
Partly because you are blinded to think that things only happen on Twitter. I heard about the whole Vic mess before I ever got involved in the Twitter wars or even knew who Ron was.



Nick is yalls waifu so I thought I would oblige.
Wait, so are you implying that Ron et al. did even more slandering of Vic behind the scenes and that somehow makes it better? Or are you saying that Vic messed up by standing up for himself with legal representation, against people who you openly admit in this very thread have exaggerated his actions to an insane degree:
To address your last line. Like I told Chambers and Squally, the level of outrage compared to what Vic has actually done is pretty unbalanced

I don’t get you; you say you want to help Vic, but you actively support the very people you admit have blown this thing out of proportion. Not only that, you’re supporting them during the very process in which they’ll actually be held accountable for their damaging accusations.

Your official line in all this is that Vic didn’t do anything bad enough to warrant public outrage, but enough to lose his job and con engagements, but you can’t fucking see that the disproportionate outrage is the exact thing that made him lose it all in the first place. So it’s okay that they lied and destroyed his career because as least his career needed destroying? You need to abandon the fantasy that whatever “confession” deal they attempted to strongarm him into wouldn’t have made things better, but that would require admitting that Nick was right about the legal route being more effective. And it’s hard to say it hasn’t; Vic’s back at cons, and has the extra perk of being able to broadcast the truth to the world that, as even you admit, he’s not a fucking predator. Hell, he’s still under more scrutiny than ever, so even if he was a bad actor in the past, there’s no way he’s not going to be better about it now.

I honestly think your only goal in this is to try to salvage whatever credibility you thought you had before Nick’s stream. You’re just trying to convince people you know things, and changing your story to whatever you think is going to ingratiate yourself to your audience at the time. You’re position is not so much #kickvic or #istandwithvic but more #istandwithshane. Your misguided engagement in all this is just flailing because you can’t handle the fact that your warped worldview, including your illusions of your own intelligence and importance, were blasted to splinters in front of tens of thousands of people.

You’ve already demonstrated that you’re incapable of following even a short train of thought well enough to give a straight answer, so I’m not expecting you to respond. This is more for my benefit. If you take one thing away from this, just realize that you’ve contradicted your own goals in all this and done nothing but make it worse. Which is hilarious enough to watch, but it seems like something that might bother you if you weren’t too dense to see it.
 
Last edited:
Wait, so are you implying that Ron et al. did even more slandering of Vic behind the scenes and that somehow makes it better? Or are you saying that Vic messed up by to stand up for himself with legal representation, against people who you openly admit in this very thread have exaggerated his actions to an insane degree:


I don’t get you; you say you want to help Vic, but you actively support the very people you admit have blown this thing out of proportion. Not only that, you’re supporting them during the very process in which they’ll actually be held accountable for their damaging accusations.

Your official line in all this is that Vic didn’t do anything bad enough to warrant public outrage, but enough to lose his job and con engagements, but you can’t fucking see that the disproportionate outrage is the exact thing that made him lose it all in the first place. So it’s okay that they lied and destroyed his career because as least his career needed destroying? You need to abandon the fantasy that whatever “confession” deal they attempted to strongarm him into wouldn’t have made things better, but that would require admitting that Nick was right about the legal route being more effective. And it’s hard to say it hasn’t; Vic’s back at cons, and has the extra perk of being able to broadcast the truth to the world that, as even you admit, he’s not a fucking predator. Hell, he’s still under more scrutiny than ever, so even if he was a bad actor in the past, there’s no way he’s not going to be better about it now.

I honestly thing your only goal in this is to try to salvage whatever credibility you thought you had before Nick’s stream. You’re just trying to convince people you know things, and changing your story to whatever you think is going to ingratiate yourself to your audience at the time. You’re position is not so much #kickvic or #istandwithvic but more #istandwithshane. Your misguided engagement in all this is just flailing because you can’t handle the fact that your warped worldview, including your illusions of your own intelligence and importance, were blasted to splinters in front of tens of thousands of people.

You’ve already demonstrated that you’re incapable of following even a short train of thought well enough to give a straight answer, so I’m not expecting you to respond. This is more for my benefit. If you take one thing away from this, just realize that you’ve contradicted your own goals in all this and done nothing but make it worse. Which is hilarious enough to watch, but it seems like something that might bother you if you weren’t too dense to see it.
Wasn’t even directed towards at me and even I felt hurt
 
@Shane_Yes_That_One I really don't care if you change your avatar from the one I gave you, but your current one is nsfw. Make some other meme that doesn't involve fat chicks fucking stools.

I love how Shane went from pope of social justice and champion of wamenns everywhere on Twitter to posting disgusting porn on forum boards within 24 hours. He can't even keep his perversions under wrap during his social justice benders. Big ups Shane.
 
Your misguided engagement in all this is just flailing because you can’t handle the fact that your warped worldview, including your illusions of your own intelligence and importance, were blasted to splinters in front of tens of thousands of people.

You are so right. Shane is forever living in this BTFO moment, and everything he does should be seen through the lens of that.
 
Wait, so are you implying that Ron et al. did even more slandering of Vic behind the scenes and that somehow makes it better? Or are you saying that Vic messed up by to stand up for himself with legal representation, against people who you openly admit in this very thread have exaggerated his actions to an insane degree:


I don’t get you; you say you want to help Vic, but you actively support the very people you admit have blown this thing out of proportion. Not only that, you’re supporting them during the very process in which they’ll actually be held accountable for their damaging accusations.

Your official line in all this is that Vic didn’t do anything bad enough to warrant public outrage, but enough to lose his job and con engagements, but you can’t fucking see that the disproportionate outrage is the exact thing that made him lose it all in the first place. So it’s okay that they lied and destroyed his career because as least his career needed destroying? You need to abandon the fantasy that whatever “confession” deal they attempted to strongarm him into wouldn’t have made things better, but that would require admitting that Nick was right about the legal route being more effective. And it’s hard to say it hasn’t; Vic’s back at cons, and has the extra perk of being able to broadcast the truth to the world that, as even you admit, he’s not a fucking predator. Hell, he’s still under more scrutiny than ever, so even if he was a bad actor in the past, there’s no way he’s not going to be better about it now.

I honestly thing your only goal in this is to try to salvage whatever credibility you thought you had before Nick’s stream. You’re just trying to convince people you know things, and changing your story to whatever you think is going to ingratiate yourself to your audience at the time. You’re position is not so much #kickvic or #istandwithvic but more #istandwithshane. Your misguided engagement in all this is just flailing because you can’t handle the fact that your warped worldview, including your illusions of your own intelligence and importance, were blasted to splinters in front of tens of thousands of people.

You’ve already demonstrated that you’re incapable of following even a short train of thought well enough to give a straight answer, so I’m not expecting you to respond. This is more for my benefit. If you take one thing away from this, just realize that you’ve contradicted your own goals in all this and done nothing but make it worse. Which is hilarious enough to watch, but it seems like something that might bother you if you weren’t too dense to see it.

Dude. Shane's an SJW. He displays all of the trappings of it. He has a massive SOB story on twitter he obviously feels continuously guilty about, constantly white knights for "teh wymmins", and the like, and everything he states about his motivations, every action he's taken, every bit of posturing reinforces that he is guilty over his treatment of women in the past, he feels women are oppressed, and that he needs to right his perceived past wrongs.

He is the most dangerous of ideologues: A guilty one. The SJW ideology is a social snake oil hocked onto a population that only gets sicker the more of it they take. It is a poison, claiming to be the medicine that cures racism and sexism when in reality it only drives the wedge between groups further and further in. And those like Shane keep taking this poison, because they feel guilty, and because to them, it's penance. It's redemption.

He's not in this to be against Vic necessarily. He's against -US-. You, me, and anyone else who don't subscribe to his ideology. But especially Nick Rekieta. Oh boy does he hate Nick Rekieta. Not only is it personal, he's also articulate, and -convincing-. He's also able to poke holes in his arguments, and provide strategies that might counter the typical outrage mob tactics.

He's not Anti-Vic. He's Anti-Nick. He hates -us-.
 
Dude. Shane's an SJW. He displays all of the trappings of it. He has a massive SOB story on twitter he obviously feels continuously guilty about, constantly white knights for "teh wymmins", and the like, and everything he states about his motivations, every action he's taken, every bit of posturing reinforces that he is guilty over his treatment of women in the past, he feels women are oppressed, and that he needs to right his perceived past wrongs.

He is the most dangerous of ideologues: A guilty one. The SJW ideology is a social snake oil hocked onto a population that only gets sicker the more of it they take. It is a poison, claiming to be the medicine that cures racism and sexism when in reality it only drives the wedge between groups further and further in. And those like Shane keep taking this poison, because they feel guilty, and because to them, it's penance. It's redemption.

He's not in this to be against Vic necessarily. He's against -US-. You, me, and anyone else who don't subscribe to his ideology. But especially Nick Rekieta. Oh boy does he hate Nick Rekieta. Not only is it personal, he's also articulate, and -convincing-. He's also able to poke holes in his arguments, and provide strategies that might counter the typical outrage mob tactics.

He's not Anti-Vic. He's Anti-Nick. He hates -us-.
Yeah, you’re right; it’s best not to forget the likelihood that Shane himself is a sex pest, and he’s trying to cover his ass by crusading for social justice.

He fills the role of a pathetic moron in my mind so completely that I forget the hints that he could be a dangerous pathetic moron. And that’s by his own fucking admission.
 
Back
Top Bottom