Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Dopey Cunt said:
I bet when this is all said and done and they lose this lawsuit because let's face it, they never had a goddamn chance, they are gonna try to make a petition to oust the judge assigned to the lawsuit because he supports rape culture or some dumb bullshit like that.
Click to expand...
even though its a jury trial it could probably still happen.
 
Army Burger said:
View attachment 769307

archive.fo

Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "It is cute all yall think Casey has are b…

archived 23 May 2019 11:08:42 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo
Click to expand...

Competent lawyers lead with their strongest arguments. And competent lawyers don't completely fail even to mention their strongest arguments.

The opening papers are what define the rest of the case. There isn't a "we're saving a secret argument for later." If you don't bring it up in your opening, you don't get to use it. Real life isn't a Phoenix Wright game.

Army Burger said:
Methheads and brain-damaged people can understand the law better than Shane.
Click to expand...


Chris-Chan has vastly more practical and actual knowledge of how the courts work than Shane. That's not even an exaggeration or hyperbole. He actually literally does and has enjoyed more success in his legal defenses than MoRon and crazy Jamie will.
 
AnOminous said:
Competent lawyers lead with their strongest arguments. And competent lawyers don't completely fail even to mention their strongest arguments.

The opening papers are what define the rest of the case. There isn't a "we're saving a secret argument for later." If you don't bring it up in your opening, you don't get to use it. Real life isn't a Phoenix Wright game.




Chris-Chan has vastly more practical and actual knowledge of how the courts work than Shane. That's not even an exaggeration or hyperbole. He actually literally does and has enjoyed more success in his legal defenses than MoRon and crazy Jamie will.
Click to expand...
How embarrassing must it be to be dumber than Chris-Chan?
 
ErbBetaPatch said:
No, I figured it out half an hour ago. Shane said in a replay to Nick's intern that the C&D requested that ron delete tweets and simultaneously not delete tweets. I speculated that he was referring to a notice to preserve evidence, which he confirmed was sent along with something else which he called a C&D. Since the notice to preserve was sent, it doesn't make sense to send a C&D because half of the claims are past damage, and you're already in the process of suing the guy. The "C&D" was a request to retract statements, which gives Ron and co. the opportunity to mitigate damages by retracting defamatory statements, which puts you in a good light with the court. As soon as I mentioned this, I got the silent tweetment from Shane, which is what he does whenever you hit the nail on the head. Shane's interpretation of the law is weaker than a student's in a mock trial class.
Click to expand...
But Nick said last night that Shane was claiming Ty sent him a C&D on behalf of Nick. Nothing to do with Ron at all.
 
Nontransferable said:
There is no scenario where they don't come out on top.

Settle the lawsuit? Vic was going to lose.
Issue a retraction? Vic bullied them into it with his GoFundMe money.
Lose the lawsuit? The justice system is broken.
Click to expand...

not if he settles Shattering-style and requires a public apology/admission of guilt from the settling parties.
 
letmeaskyouthis.png


archive.fo

Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "Let me ask you this..did Ty put every sin…

archived 23 May 2019 16:05:31 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

Whataboutism, a sure sign that a person's argument has failed.
 
Monkey Prick said:
But Nick said last night that Shane was claiming Ty sent him a C&D on behalf of Nick. Nothing to do with Ron at all.
Click to expand...
Shane later mentions it was not him who received it in another tweet. So its Shane.....
 
Army Burger said:
View attachment 769507

archive.fo

Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "Let me ask you this..did Ty put every sin…

archived 23 May 2019 16:05:31 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

Whataboutism, a sure sign that a person's argument has failed.
Click to expand...

Ty put in enough evidence to justify the merit of his claims. Unlike the original answer, the evidence presented in the original petition was from verified sources and sufficient to claim defamation and TI. The original answer was hot garbage. Keep it up shane!
 
Army Burger said:
View attachment 769507

archive.fo

Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "Let me ask you this..did Ty put every sin…

archived 23 May 2019 16:05:31 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

Whataboutism, a sure sign that a person's argument has failed.
Click to expand...
B-b-but he did didn't he? Pretty sure the rest of the evidence needed to strengthen the case Ty doesn't have access to, which is why he asked for their emails and stuff for discovery.

Shane is just so fucking dumb it actually boils my piss a little, every day I hope he gets sucked into this in a legal capacity and has his entire life ruined.
 
GeneralMint said:
not if he settles Shattering-style and requires a public apology/admission of guilt from the settling parties.
Click to expand...

Monica and Jamie halfheartedly reading a prepared statement on camera wouldn't change the fact that Vic is guilty. PULL would understand that they don't really mean it. We all know that the justice system isn't on the side of victims and there are financial considerations in fighting a frivolous lawsuit.
 
It's always funny to me that Shane picked up "how embarrassing" after the shitshow on Nicks stream. Almost like he's trying to turn it around on him but it's incredibly obvious and won't work.
 
ProfDongs said:
It's always funny to me that Shane picked up "how embarrassing" after the shitshow on Nicks stream. Almost like he's trying to turn it around on him but it's incredibly obvious and won't work.
Click to expand...
He's desperate to try to get one up on Nick, and failing every time he tries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom