- Joined
- May 8, 2019
He's talking about the TDMA notices he leaked a couple pages from and is acting as if it's the entire document. If he did, guaranteed we'd be seeing it in the farms somewhere.The fuck is he even talking about?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's talking about the TDMA notices he leaked a couple pages from and is acting as if it's the entire document. If he did, guaranteed we'd be seeing it in the farms somewhere.The fuck is he even talking about?
As if Shane has ever put any thought into what he tweets.Context is everything. Is it so hard to think about what you post before hitting send on twitter?
The fuck is he even talking about?
to throw out an analogy, just because you're handy under the hood of a car doesn't mean you know how to fix everything with an engine in it.
The real reason why they didn't go over the TDMA letters is because once the plaintiff publishes the defamatory statements they are no longer considered defamatory. So thanks @Shane_Yes_That_One for completely eradicating one of each defendants affirmative defenses, "the statements can't be considered defamatory because they were published by the plaintiff"View attachment 813408
![]()
Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "Worth noting, the reason Nick/Ty never ac…
archived 24 Jun 2019 14:03:08 UTCarchive.fo
It's "worth noting" that not a damn thing you've said about this case is true.
Shane either doesn't care or doesn't know. Neither one is a good look for him.Has shane forgotten that the real lawsuit is in filings and court, not on youtube or twitter? even if the twitter lawyers were right about everything and nick was wrong about everything, that doesn't matter because none of them are in the lawsuit and it's ultimately up to the judge to decide how things are gonna move forward.
Maybe it’s because people find those on KickVic getting GFMs at the exact timing of legal trouble to be quite coincidentalView attachment 813452
![]()
Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "Nicks own mod, wants people to give him m…
archived 24 Jun 2019 15:02:50 UTCarchive.li
Fuck you shane
Also archive is being fucky
I'd say that Shane has figured out that things are not looking good for his pals in the actual court of law, and as such the only "win" that they'll be able to scrape by with will be on social media in the court of public opinion.Has shane forgotten that the real lawsuit is in filings and court, not on youtube or twitter? even if the twitter lawyers were right about everything and nick was wrong about everything, that doesn't matter because none of them are in the lawsuit and it's ultimately up to the judge to decide how things are gonna move forward.
For him to have forgotten that he'd first have to have learned it, and he clearly never has. KV reminds me of Oberlin college so much in that they both live in this ideological bubble where they've pushed out all contrarian thought that they think the rest of the world actually works the way they think it does/should. Remember how Oberlin sent out that email blaming the jurors instead of accepting that they were in the wrong?Has shane forgotten that the real lawsuit is in filings and court, not on youtube or twitter?
Hard X on that one Shame.View attachment 813460
![]()
Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "There are hundreds if not thousands of co…
archived 24 Jun 2019 15:20:50 UTCarchive.fo
View attachment 813460
![]()
Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "There are hundreds if not thousands of co…
archived 24 Jun 2019 15:20:50 UTCarchive.fo
iirc several months ago Shane said that he personally worked for cons that received reports about vic and other abusers and didn't do a thing. This guy is now rightfully asking what exact con and which person ran this. Shane being the stupid fuckwit he is is playing some Matrix and dodging every question thrown at himWhat the fuck is he even blathering about? What reports?
I assume he's talking about reports of sexual harassment at cons, but his comments are always so incoherent you can never be 100% sure.What the fuck is he even blathering about? What reports?
iirc several months ago Shane said that he personally worked for cons that received reports about vic and other abusers and didn't do a thing. This guy is now rightfully asking what exact con and which person ran this. Shane being the stupid fuckwit he is is playing some Matrix and dodging every question thrown at him
I assume he's talking about reports of sexual harassment at cons, but his comments are always so incoherent you can never be 100% sure.
Shane. We have been specifically searching for those reports for almost 6 months, and how many we find so far? 0.View attachment 813460
![]()
Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "There are hundreds if not thousands of co…
archived 24 Jun 2019 15:20:50 UTCarchive.fo