Sea Salt Mine - here there be chimping over the lawsuit

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Screen Shot 2020-05-01 at 10.29.11 AM.png


https://archive.is/TJqAZ

Totally not mad at all.
 
Where have I heard this before? “You people are stupid for donating to that GFM”. I know. All the KV idiots from last year. And guess what? That money could’ve gone to Funimation’s bank account if you people didn’t try to ruin a man’s life and piss off your fans in public. It’s like people have found a better reason to spend money on something.
“Shut up, you meanie. How dare you criticize me for doing exactly what I accuse the other side for doing? Don’t come after me! I’m smarter than all of you! WEHHHH!”
 
Someone hit me with a hammer in the head please..the migraine from reading that lunacy wont stop.
 
Someone hit me with a hammer in the head please..the migraine from reading that lunacy wont stop.
Hey, guys, let's dox this guy and beat him to death with hammers, it's what he wants!
 
Maybe I'm retarded, but I don't understand their argument.
1. "I don't remember these events having occurred."
2. "If these events had occurred, I would have remembered them."

If 1 and 2 are taken as true how can the reasonable conclusion be anything other than "I did not witness this event?"

And if another statement is "He witnessed this event," how can both sets be true?

Am I retarded? Because maybe I'm just not seeing the logic here.
 
Maybe I'm retarded, but I don't understand their argument.
1. "I don't remember these events having occurred."
2. "If these events had occurred, I would have remembered them."

If 1 and 2 are taken as true how can the reasonable conclusion be anything other than "I did not witness this event?"

And if another statement is "He witnessed this event," how can both sets be true?

Am I retarded? Because maybe I'm just not seeing the logic here.

they're desperate for any way to try and disprove Stan's testimony. He's said before that if it had happened, it'd have been grounds for him to ban Vic/have him removed from the con, but that he doesn't recall it happening the way Monica claims it did and that because there was no direct fallout for Vic, that it most likely didn't happen.

their big brained argument is 'if you don't remember then how can you claim it didn't happen?' which imo is akin to someone being asked if they had witnessed a murder. I dunno seems to me that if you walk in on a scene of either Vic forcing himself on Monica or them sitting apart and Monica sobbing quietly like the meek little victim she claims to be, that sorta thing wouldn't just stick, but you'd be asking a few pointed questions like 'what's going on?' and 'why doesn't this room have a balcony if Monica is supposed to be standing on it after dinner?'
 
Well FlutFlut, it was a futile battle to reason with a bunch of unreasonable minds, but I give you credit for trying.

How dare Stan Dahlin go against their narrative. How dare someone, who was named as a witness to an alleged assault without his consent, get pissed off and denied all these allegations. Yet somehow it's Stan's fault and he's the liar, not the cretin who publicly referred to him in a deposition. Good grief.
 
mhgfhj.png gmjfdg.png jhfc.png

What death threats you fucking cunt?
rehfdth.png
fdjndc.png

@Spectre_06
In case if you ever want to get back at this simpcunt.

"R.etard"
wfhdfj.pngrtjdsjg.pnghgkdhj.pngyukdgh.pngteajskhg.png

"cunt"
fgkjk.pngfdjfgj.pngtrfjfgj.pngjsgfj.pnggfdkhgk.png

 
Last edited:
View attachment 1267722View attachment 1267721View attachment 1267720

What death threats you simpcunt?
View attachment 1267728View attachment 1267727
@Spectre_06
In case if you ever want to get back at this simpcunt.
"R.etard"

"cunt"


[/spoiler]
How appropriated that he changed his username to Isolated Lupinfan, because he is truly isolated from reality.
 
Badass male feminist chadasaurus rex Martik Bettik continues to own a degenerate rape apologist VicStan with facts and logic.



Chad Male Feminist own misogynist rape apologist Stan Dahlin.PNG


We need more chads like Martin Bettik to own the spedtactular Vicstans and Kiwi incels.





Bettik chadery.PNG Martin Bettik, the chad.PNG

Also alleged Ron Soye sighting in the Stan Dahlin drama.



Ron Soye up in this shitstorm.PNG
 
Thats a rare sighting. Is Ron sharpening his remotes?
 
Back
Top Bottom