Sandy Hook - truth or fiction?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Sort by date Sort by votes
It happened but the families became opportunistic grifters using their fucking murdered kids as a means of bolstering the agendas for their selected political party and suing anyone who found that skeevy or starrted thinking it was fake because of their behavior. The truth is that politics money can fucking corrupt people to such fucking nightmarish degrees that they do shit like milk a tragedy for all it's worth to just go "REPUBLICANS BAD!!! GUNS BAD!! VOTE BLUUUUEEE!" Fuck the two party political machine and all the things it's made people into.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yes it happened. I only wish Nancy Lanza lived long enough to meet the monster she created.
3EA67A01-32F7-4371-AB47-E9DA94F56840.jpeg CE1215E0-21A5-4C86-A574-AEFE328E6350.png 5C46747D-7EF3-4BBD-9F5F-7F6D2DE8059D.jpeg E7857369-9A88-406B-BFB7-E9F9B16FE26C.jpeg
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Sandy Hook happened until it was ruled Alex Jones saying mean things to the parents of dead kids was 1000 times more damaging than the actual murder of said dead children; so no, Sandy Hook no longer happened.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Why are we still talking about this in any way shape or form though?

Other people's kids died, therefore I honestly really shouldn't give a shit. Oh no, the poor wittle babies got shot to death by an autist. Shit happens. Becoming a political grifter just because your kid was murdered is the worst excuse ever and that's literally what happened after the fact. The Stoneman Douglas high school kids are in the same exact boat, same situation. "People shot at us and we witnessed our friends die, SO VOTE BLUE AND SAY NO TO GUNS!"

How about, just get therapy for the horrific shit you went through, and go back to being a cog in the giant societal machine like everyone else is.
 
Upvote -3 Downvote
Weed Eater said:
How about, just get therapy for the horrific shit you went through, and go back to being a cog in the giant societal machine like everyone else is.
Click to expand...
The thing is their grift IS being a cog the giant societal machine. Not in a "haha people have shit jobs shit labor life sucks" way. They made an active decistion to throw away their virtues and any semblance of actual individuality other than "MASS SHOOTING VICTIM RELATIVE!!!" for fucking goodboy points on their chosen political machine team. Most people who lose family in a mass shooting do eventually move on and get fucked up in the process. you don't hear much about a lot of the other mass shooting victims' families, nor do you hear much abut the survivors unless they've given themselves wholly to the media grift. Years ago I'd say these guys were doing it to cope with their grief and the shock of the situation but now all these years later and they're still making it their whole identity? Yeah no fuck off I know this game.
 
Upvote 1 Downvote
At the very least it didn't happen like the official story says it did.

Watch this video, ignore what the guy who posted it said, just listen to the people in the news clips talking

www.bitchute.com

Why Adam Lanza Never Fired an assault Rifle at Sandy Hook School

More Sandy HooK Videos: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/Hsaive For those of us who've researched the facts, we know that nobody died at Sandy Hook - It was a FEMA Drill to promote gun control... then promoted by CNN and vampire media as a real-w…
www.bitchute.com www.bitchute.com

You see them pull the Bushmaster AR 15 that Adam's mother bought him from the trunk of his car.
You see the coroner not give a straight answer to the question "Which gun was used?"
This video makes a case for if it did happen he used a plain old shot gun not an evil "assault weapon"
It also brings up the reasonable question "If they are lying about which gun he used what else are they lying about?"

I was hoping this would all get looked into during the lawsuit with Remington.
Sadly the insurance company just settled rather than fight.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I haven't thought about this in a long time. I watch a lot of Viva/Barnes, and Robert Barns has always held there was a cover up at Sandy Hook, but it wasn't some staged event. It was that local officials didn't take simple precautions post-Columbine, such as having classrooms with doors that could key-lock from the inside. He said this in defense of Alex Jones, claiming that AJ had some people on, interviewing them about Sandy Hook; but that 90% of his content on Sandy Hook that year indicated it was a real shooting in which children and teachers died. Barnes claims the school was bulldozed to cover up liability for school board administrators. As we know from the other threads on Alex Jones, in Austin, he was denied the right to a jury trial (judge issued summary judgement) and denied the right to enter exculpatory evidence or even make a freedom of speech defense.

The Barnes explanation seems to be plausible ... except they bulldozed a school to cover up not putting two sided key locks on classroom doors? Really?

I can't figure out what got me down this rabbit hole. Maybe it was a comment on another blog post, but anyway, I somehow started watching this soph view on BitChute:


I have never heard of Soph before. I also took a look at the WikiSpook page, which has a good amount of information on inconsistencies and removed videos.


The sources in wikispooks are pretty interesting, including archive links to 2014 You Tube video (I don't think archive dot org can or does archive modern videos, but it could back then with the classic player). Here is a clip that will always get removed, 100%, if it's ever posted again on YouTube:


There's also this old page with a timeline of events that's still up:


I remember when the book "No One Died at Sandy Hook" got removed from Amazon, and the author make the PDF available for free. Today, most of the old 2010s videos about all the inconsistencies and problems with the Sandy Hook story have been deleted from YouTube. Why was there such a massive effort to go after Alex Jones? Notice how people rarely question mass shooting today in the same way? I think the Alex Jones prescient, where the largest alt-media host with the most money capitulated to the system, has had a chilling effect on everyone in alternative media. I think the more you look at the original story and all the stuff that has been deleted and censored, the more it seems like this was a botched event of some kind (I think they were expecting two shooters) to have a 1996 Hobart Shooting style effect on America.

It's an interesting thing to revisit, and a terrifying reminder of how powerful media narratives are on the majority of the population. For the rest of the people, the lawsuits and insane defamation charges take care of the rest.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom