Sanctioned Suicide - "Kill yourself" but unironically with sodium nitrite. Higher death count than the Farms. Targeted by parents, legislators, and journalists looking to alter Section 230.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
>I hate female youtubers who show their face, those narcissistic attention whores!
>Except the ones who are cute tho teehee then I gib clicks
The fuck? I clearly said she rarely showed her face and didn't make herself the center of attention for her channel... which is contrast to female true crime channels i said (not "female youtubers") who feel the need to put themselves in the fucking thumbnail and make themselves the entire focal point of attention for every video. I then made one side note that she was attractive (unrelated) to that only to say that she probably doesn't feel the need to hide her face for this reason.

It's hard to beleive that you're really this fucking stupid that you twisted my words this bad and that's the result you got. You're gonna have to try harder if that you're that desperate to get someone into some "gotcha" considering that's uh... not even close to what was implied.
>I use green text to put words into other niggas mouths
 
Last edited:
i don't know how you can even help people that are just cult-meat that can be led to suicide not by personal trauma or a close death or other suicide but by troons or sheenis adjacent fan ficcing, and i don't think it's possible to know how to help people that lived past the age of sticks, into sharp blades that could heart thrust or neck-less, beyond into the age of boomsticks, mouth to prevent jerking away instinctively, and alchohol, fuck, nigga if you want to make sure, boomstick, alchohol, mouth, slightly leaning backward off tall building, but instead are too scared of that, and so choose the equivalent of feet first into wood chipper

if you are too scared or unsure of a gun or blade working, you shouldn't be doing any method because you'll just fuck up and be a vegetable and/or with newly long term medical issues, certainly chemical shit, and if a forum can make you troon or kill yourself, complete internet moderation doesn't fix that because they'll just fall victim to newly-increased irl troon/cult/radical advertisers. that shit wouldn't go away. if anything it should just be saying not to try some shit like an escape bag or online chemical orders, if you have early onset dementia and your family's already gone or some genuine worst case shit and you don't want to ride it out or have religious limitations, take some liquor, get a double barrel, maybe a loud wireless stereo, go into the woods

do not turn your entire bloodstream into jello unless you're an active masochist who wishes they could die by a cartel, in which case just go to mexico ghettos and say they fuck troons in the ass and that's how they're so brown, and "funky town" was fake, fucking retards
 
>I hate female youtubers who show their face, those narcissistic attention whores!
>Except the ones who are cute tho teehee then I gib clicks

The fuck? I clearly said she rarely showed her face and didn't make herself the center of attention for her channel... which is contrast to female true crime channels i said (not "female youtubers") who feel the need to put themselves in the fucking thumbnail and make themselves the entire focal point of attention for every video. I then made one side note that she was attractive (unrelated) to that only to say that she probably doesn't feel the need to hide her face for this reason.

It's hard to beleive that you're really this fucking stupid that you twisted my words this bad and that's the result you got. You're gonna have to try harder if that you're that desperate to get someone into some "gotcha" considering that's uh... not even close to what was implied.
>I use green text to put words into other niggas mouths
1768276574234.png
It's just this but with podcasting/youtubing.
 
While I don't endorse the mission of this website, I do not like how sensationalized it is. When I watched the Tantacrul video I didn't question his depiction website since a lot of what he explained felt somewhat plausible. Reading the OP, I still do think that it's probably not the best community to be around for someone with suicidal ideation, and the people running it are a bit questionable, but I ended up believing that you need to have a website like this standing on the free internet.

Perhaps exploitive and it undeniably attracts people with questionable morbid interests, but it reminds me of old carnival freak shows. It's a glorified display of the disfigured, but compared to begging in the street, it's a more dignified way to make a living, and it's likely the only place where they can be in a community of other outcasts. Then there was moral outrage towards these institutions, that, it's exploitive, dehumanizing, and societally uncouth. It wasn't like there is no truth to these claims, but those who protest them often are just as unsympathetic to these individuals' plights and circumstances, and don't realize the insufficiency of the solution they propose. Banning freakshows don't actually address why these people ended up there to begin with.

Now, it's not the most respectful comparison to make between freak shows and the suicidal, but the situation reported by journalists is far too sensationalized and simplified. People push for banning these websites, and think that it would unambiguously lead to lives being saved. Except that all it effectively does is hide an ugly side of life from the public. Virtually all platforms will not allow communities that have open communication on this topic; it's understandable why, but it's not because these platforms have a solution to improve mental health; no one does.

Does Sanctioned Suicide actually solve the issue of mental health? They don't claim to do so. But the push to take it down, a website that acted as the last desperate refuge for those who can no longer seek hope in life, is not exactly an empathetic societal movement it makes it out to be.
 
if you are too scared or unsure of a gun or blade working
This isn't a question of too scared or not. Have you ever considered that maybe people don't want to traumatise their family by having them find their brain splattered on the ceiling and having to deal with that? Or the random people on the street or the train driver or whatever. People on the 'I want to fucking kill myself because of personal trauma' website probably don't want to needlessly cause more trauma. That and some people just don't like the idea of fucking with their corpse.
 
This isn't a question of too scared or not. Have you ever considered that maybe people don't want to traumatise their family by having them find their brain splattered on the ceiling and having to deal with that? Or the random people on the street or the train driver or whatever. People on the 'I want to fucking kill myself because of personal trauma' website probably don't want to needlessly cause more trauma. That and some people just don't like the idea of fucking with their corpse.
Retarded. That's called being retarded. You're going to traumatize them no matter what. I've seen people who went about as peacefully as you could, they're still half blue and stiff as a board with chameleon eyes laying in a pile of shit and vomit from the death rattles just hours later. If you want to avoid traumatizing people go off-trail in the wilderness and dig yourself a grave.

Anybody operating under the delusion that they're going to leave a pretty corpse hasn't been paying attention to the fucking literature.
 
Anybody operating under the delusion that they're going to leave a pretty corpse hasn't been paying attention to the fucking literature.
You are arguing with the logic of someone who is about to kill themselves. Whether you agree or not it doesn't matter, that's the logic. And from what I've heard no, firearms suicides traumatise even crime scene cleaners, at least more than the average. It's going to traumatise someone yea but I'd rather walk in to find some piss and shit rather than a cavity for a head.
 
Sodium nitrate is almost harmless (or at least not a remotely practical suicide method). The suicide substance is sodium nitrite.
Its really bizarre that almost anyone could get nembutal a decade ago, But everyone is so against people killing themselves that they have to resort to more uh, "creative" methods to do it.

Soon sodium nitrite will be just as hard to obtain and people by 2028 will have to start eating detergent pods and hope for the best. Pro lifers can eat my dick with a fork and knife
 
Soon sodium nitrite will be just as hard to obtain and people by 2028 will have to start eating detergent pods and hope for the best. Pro lifers can eat my dick with a fork and knife
Won't happen. It has too many absolutely routine uses. They might try to adulterate it somehow to remove its death causing abilities (not sure whether there is any substance that can do that), but they're not getting rid of what is used to make literally almost every cured meat.

This would be sort of like how most helium you can get now contains oxygen sufficient not to suffocate from it.
 
Soon sodium nitrite will be just as hard to obtain
Starting up a business where I half cycle fish tanks and then sell the water for explicitly not drinking purposes, looking for investors.
not sure whether there is any substance that can do that
Do not underestimate the retardation of the English government. They 100% will ban it and force everyone to use a shitty alternative that doesn't work properly. Like how any acidic cleaning product is now incredibly hard to find because muslims kept throwing it at people. Sulphuric drain cleaner is incredibly hard to find if not just impossible, trying to find any limescale product that isn't just perfume and surfactant is a ballache too despite it being absolute dogshit. Same for hydrogen peroxide, good luck finding that at anything higher than 3%. Maybe curing meat is different, maybe there was just some other reason that the heavily indian political parties wanted to ban cleaning products. But I do not doubt for a second that they would try to just outright ban it or the good old require a license to buy any.
 
Won't happen. It has too many absolutely routine uses.
i've heard from many users it's now significantly harder to obtain SN compared to 6 years ago. People who have SN from years ago say their source is no longer a source.

It's pretty funny to me how a chemical used for suicide is talked about like designer drugs are 😭
 
There's a fent OD crisis that's devastating the country, and fent pills are cheaper than ever, and yet some people want boutique substances to die. :politisperg:

Chester Bennington and Anthony Bourdain had unlimited drug access and still chose the good ol' reliable belt.
 
Sorry to ask here but does anyone know where that podcast episode is that interviewed Marquis (Lamarcus) and one of the moms whose kid killed himself supposedly because of SS? I believe I heard it a couple years ago but no matter how many google searches, I can't seem to find it anymore

Edit: never mind found it, so odd how they dont name any of the guests in the description at all...at least not Marquis/LaMarcus or name drop Sanctioned Suicide which would inherently make finding the episode so much easier
Any point giving it a listen? I might've listened to it before actually, IIRC the mom ends up just screaming at LaMarcus by the end of it. I mean whoever thought having them talk was a good idea! I'm actually amazed LaMarcus agreed.
 
Wow a channel I actually like used this site for YouTube content today. Time to unsubscribe from this stupid bitch.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=qiTl95X0_PU
View attachment 8411196

Lmfao, faggots on Tantacrul's dick. Theyre just an echo chamber of retardation with zero original research for themselves
The Internet Investigator has taken down the video.
"I have made the decision to take down my most recent video. While I stand by my reasons for covering the topic in the first place, I acknowledge some of the criticisms you guys made and ultimately I don’t want to risk the forum gaining more users because of my video.

Reactions to this were mixed – many of you supported my decision to cover it and the way I went about it; I even had a couple of comments from active users on the forum who said my video had changed their perspective on it and made them realise that it’s an echo chamber that will inevitably make them spiral. This was my intention. In addition to raising awareness of the dangers of this forum in general, I hoped that by highlighting its shady origins and the fact that those who founded it likely didn’t have the users’ best interests at heart, that some existing users might realise this is not a good place for them to be, and that there are many other more helpful resources for people who are contemplating taking their own lives.

However there were some fair comments criticising certain aspects of the video, such as my decision to use a phrase that is commonly used on the forum to refer to someone taking their own life. It didn’t occur to me at the time that this term alone would make it easier for people to find the forum. When this was pointed out, I removed the full phrase from the video (in the rest of it, I used the abbreviation). But I realise now that this isn’t enough, and I think the best course of action is to take down the entire video.

Unfortunately, the forum is pretty easy to find even without this phrase. I didn’t want to name it because that would make it as simple as someone literally just typing in the URL straight from my video, and even one extra step in the process of finding the forum could be enough to deter some people. That was my reasoning behind keeping the video up until now, but having taken some time to think about it, I don’t want anything I said in that video to help anyone in any way find the forum.

I never intended to cause any harm with this video but I acknowledge this was a massive oversight on my part and I sincerely apologise to anyone who was negatively affected by it in any way. I will learn from this and try to be more mindful of the possible ramifications arising from the way I cover certain topics in the future. I really appreciate that people took the time to voice their concerns, and I hope you will all continue to do so if you ever feel that any of my videos could cause any harm. We’re all here because we share an interest in disturbing topics, but I also want my videos to be of some value, whether that’s through raising awareness, educating on certain things or dispelling myths surrounding controversial topics. If any of my future videos fail to do this, or if those things are outweighed by potentially negative consequences, as seems to be the case here, please don’t hesitate to tell me, and I’ll act accordingly.

Thanks for your ongoing support 🖤"
 
This was my intention
No it wasn't. 'I made a video about a forum that 99.99% of my viewerbase have never heard about in the hopes that the 0.01% will see my video and change their mind'. Either incredibly retarded or delusions of grandeur. If you in any way thought that you had more viewers that are current members of the forum than ones that are potential future ones then you're just retarded. You made the video because you want money and it's your job, it's not complicated, you probably never thought about the public opinion until now.
 
The Internet Investigator has taken down the video.
"I have made the decision to take down my most recent video. While I stand by my reasons for covering the topic in the first place, I acknowledge some of the criticisms you guys made and ultimately I don’t want to risk the forum gaining more users because of my video.

Reactions to this were mixed – many of you supported my decision to cover it and the way I went about it; I even had a couple of comments from active users on the forum who said my video had changed their perspective on it and made them realise that it’s an echo chamber that will inevitably make them spiral. This was my intention. In addition to raising awareness of the dangers of this forum in general, I hoped that by highlighting its shady origins and the fact that those who founded it likely didn’t have the users’ best interests at heart, that some existing users might realise this is not a good place for them to be, and that there are many other more helpful resources for people who are contemplating taking their own lives.

However there were some fair comments criticising certain aspects of the video, such as my decision to use a phrase that is commonly used on the forum to refer to someone taking their own life. It didn’t occur to me at the time that this term alone would make it easier for people to find the forum. When this was pointed out, I removed the full phrase from the video (in the rest of it, I used the abbreviation). But I realise now that this isn’t enough, and I think the best course of action is to take down the entire video.

Unfortunately, the forum is pretty easy to find even without this phrase. I didn’t want to name it because that would make it as simple as someone literally just typing in the URL straight from my video, and even one extra step in the process of finding the forum could be enough to deter some people. That was my reasoning behind keeping the video up until now, but having taken some time to think about it, I don’t want anything I said in that video to help anyone in any way find the forum.

I never intended to cause any harm with this video but I acknowledge this was a massive oversight on my part and I sincerely apologise to anyone who was negatively affected by it in any way. I will learn from this and try to be more mindful of the possible ramifications arising from the way I cover certain topics in the future. I really appreciate that people took the time to voice their concerns, and I hope you will all continue to do so if you ever feel that any of my videos could cause any harm. We’re all here because we share an interest in disturbing topics, but I also want my videos to be of some value, whether that’s through raising awareness, educating on certain things or dispelling myths surrounding controversial topics. If any of my future videos fail to do this, or if those things are outweighed by potentially negative consequences, as seems to be the case here, please don’t hesitate to tell me, and I’ll act accordingly.

Thanks for your ongoing support 🖤"
1768774529233.jpeg
 
The Internet Investigator has taken down the video.
"I have made the decision to take down my most recent video. While I stand by my reasons for covering the topic in the first place, I acknowledge some of the criticisms you guys made and ultimately I don’t want to risk the forum gaining more users because of my video
I was hoping she was going to take it down, but her reasons are still stated in a very condescending tone
>" | even had a couple of comments from active users on the forum who said my video had changed their perspective on it and made them realise that it's an echo chamber that will inevitably make them spiral."

Yeah somehow I very much doubt that.

My unsubscription stays.

If she would have something like:
"Sorry I offended people who have unthinkably horrendous lives by unfairly exploiting the only site they have to express themselves on without fear of being involuntarily committed to a mental hospital (the closest thing to a Hell on the green earth we stand on) as a predatory pro-suicide forum all for the sake of YouTube content"
Then I would continue watching her videos as normal
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom