This whole thread devolved into basically random newfags joining just to accuse
@afounder over the course of dozens of pages of random shit that he may or may not have not done and how this somehow makes him literally Hitler or something. Great quality discussion you got there.
It's pretty funny that the biggest lolcow of the thread is not the black incel Hitler figure that everyone has made
@afounder out to be. Now why is that?
Generations of shitty TV have convinced Americans that law is an exercise in saying magical words to people in robes and that the point of law school is to learn magical words. That's why so many low-information types will screech "shouting fire in a theater" in arguing that forums like KF are unprotected by the First Amendment, as if
obiter dictum from a century-old, now-overturned case has any bearing on how the Constitution is currently interpreted. Or they will type "United States free speech exceptions" into Google, and once they've learned magical words such as "fighting words" and "incitement," without reading any case law, they'll repeat them
ad nauseam in the hopes that the magic will work and that Interpol will swoop in and arrest everyone on the internet who maliciously exposed them to a differing viewpoint. (Despite Interpol being an administrative entity with no law enforcement powers anywhere, there's a significant number of idiots who think that they are an "international police force".)
This lack of understanding explains most of the anti-SS crowd's desperate antics. People like Kelli Wilson are enormously upset because, after a personal tragedy of their own making, some smarmy Assistant U.S. Attorney is unable to simply cast a magic spell and change the interwebs and throw Master in prison for life. I mean, start at
35:10 of Tantacrul's crappy video and just listen to Rep. Lori Trahan:
I sat on my bed and I listened to the whole thing. I thought, "How could this be?" And I just thought it was going to be, y'know, "Okay, folks don't know that this is happening." "I'm going to write to the Department of Justice," "and I'm going to say, 'You need to shut this down." And then I was reminded that there, uh, y'know, this is a complex legal territory that we're in, um, so it wasn't just so straightforward, um...
It's honestly pretty sad that a member of Congress had to be "reminded" that the First Amendment was "complex legal territory". This person is a lawmaker? Maybe we'll hire an engineer who doesn't understand the Pythagorean theorem to design a bridge. I'm sure it'll work out just fine for the people driving on it.
So as far as this thread is concerned, here's what the most ardent and zealous opposition to
@afounder boils down to. Three categories:
1) Lefty journoscum who simply do not believe in individual agency, for ideological reasons. They also believe that the state should exercise a terrifying amount of control over online speech. They consider SS responsible for deaths the same way that Null and LibsofTikTok are "stochastic terrorists" responsible for the "trans genocide" (lol), because
post hoc ergo propter hoc.
2) Narcissist parents of those who caught the plane who simply do not believe in individual agency, but for personal reasons. They believe that their son or daughter was "groomed" into committing suicide and want "accountability" (except for their own actions). The alternative is coming to terms with the fact that they were a terrible enough parent to the extent that their child didn't feel comfortable coming to them for support.
3) William Lupinacci, aka "melo". Mentally ill troon fetishist from Reston, VA who is on his 5th or 6th KF account, has autistically stalked
@afounder since he was booted off an incel wiki project (how socially inept do you have to be an outcast among incels?). Might deserve a thread here in his own right.
Of course, there's some legitimate criticism to be made of SS (and every online platform in existence). But that criticism is unlikely to encompass "we should fundamentally reshape the internet and silence millions of people, fuck your rights," or "Master should be publicly executed for running an (entirely legal) website."