Sanctioned Suicide - "Kill yourself" but unironically with sodium nitrite. Higher death count than the Farms. Targeted by parents, legislators, and journalists looking to alter Section 230.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
afounder said:
It's great that this isn't an interrogation, but an online forum, because if I was being interrogated, I wouldn't say a word to law enforcement without my lawyer being present. People dying on your website doesn't constitute a crime in any way, and those that try to insinuate that a website kills people are being dishonest.

If you have to twist other people's words, harass them endlessly for years via journalists, and make direct death threats and post people's addresses on the internet to attempt to get other people to do something instead, then you have not only lost the argument, but your own sanity as well.
Click to expand...
cool story bro
also have nothing to do with that stuff, I also don't think the journalists are harassing you,
 
Last edited:
I'll bite a potential troll and make fun of this even though its directed at afounder. It is better to debunk the main point than the gish gallop happening right now

melo said:
Doesn't matter he was the SanctionedSuicide domain registrant this year and last and the main person speaking for the site here. He's definitely not the owner, because someone could have just accidentally put his name down when renewing the domain. If SanctionedSuicide shared an IP with incels.is after 2021, maybe they just accidentally had a copy of incels.is to put online.
Click to expand...
Nobody cares about WHOIS. WHOIS is not an ID that you must legally keep obtained.

You can also see my previous posts of stylometry as another point on why your points are bullshit.

melo said:
Also, the BBC and multiple news outlets who have tried to approach him two weeks ago have the wrong guy, they're mistaken! The major media, especially the BBC, is so corrupt, never do fact checking, and so they have the totally wrong guy.
Click to expand...
Ah yes, I think X cannot lie so Y is wrong.

Ignoring the Big Black Cock previous mistakes the Big Black Cock is not thing that magically makes articles. it has journoscum and as posted before Angus has no idea about how the internet works and thinks that tor is some deep web hackerzf stuffzz!!!!!! and constantly talks about how the online safety bill is the best thing and will work.

That is not the tight debunk you think it is. I trust the Big Black Cock with weather reports. I do not trust with any internet news

melo said:
The right approach for a suicide site to stay alive is to rally around an Elliot Rodger worshipper who founded an incel forum that routinely tells people to go on spree shootings, and again he does not own it and didn't after he said his brother owned it.
Click to expand...
Nobody was talking about incels in this part of the thread and nobody cares anyways.

Do incels commit crimes? Yes. Do these have to do with SS? No.

I realize this argument is because you think that Rain is Small. Again, see my stylometry in my literal first post here for why this is false.

I realize this will not convince you because you already seem very stuck in your opinions. This is here to debunk your stupidity to the readers, not to you.
 
melo said:
cool story bro
Click to expand...
"cool story bro" is not an appropriate response to a two word sentence asking you for clarification on something you just said. It's not an appropriate response to a relatively brief answer to pointed allegations you're making against somebody. It's generally not appropriate at all when you're talking about a topic that you broached, and that you're clearly emotionally invested in.

It's something people generally only say when confronted with long-winded uninteresting stuff they can't be bothered paying attention to, so you might remember using it more appropriately in response to your deceased child's cries for help.
 
I've heard a wide variety of opinions on these types of forums, I've seen people say that the openness about the topic actually provides a way to reach people suffering from suicidality, while on the opposite end of the spectrum some psycho niggas go there to push people to ack. Idk what to think
 
Doubly Punished Snigger said:
I've heard a wide variety of opinions on these types of forums, I've seen people say that the openness about the topic actually provides a way to reach people suffering from suicidality, while on the opposite end of the spectrum some psycho niggas go there to push people to ack. Idk what to think
Click to expand...
Very healthy and based opinion. Unfortunately just with any community there's always some fuckers with a fetish ruining everything, and there's also the issue of mental illness being contagious.
 
Last edited:
Doubly Punished Snigger said:
I've heard a wide variety of opinions on these types of forums, I've seen people say that the openness about the topic actually provides a way to reach people suffering from suicidality, while on the opposite end of the spectrum some psycho niggas go there to push people to ack. Idk what to think
Click to expand...

I think the truth is somewhere down the middle, while there may be some bad actors, the forum does provide openness on a topic that hardly anywhere else offers.
 
afounder said:
I think the truth is somewhere down the middle, while there may be some bad actors, the forum does provide openness on a topic that hardly anywhere else offers.
Click to expand...
I'm going to operate under the assumption that you are actually the founder. What measures does your site take in order to actually protect people from predatory sadists that very much would be attracted to a site like this, and likely already are?
 
Doubly Punished Snigger said:
I'm going to operate under the assumption that you are actually the founder. What measures does your site take in order to actually protect people from predatory sadists that very much would be attracted to a site like this, and likely already are?
Click to expand...

I am a co-founder, but I no longer operate the site.

The steps that we took to minimize that is to screen new members and encourage those that experience any type of weird behavior from someone to report them. Under my time as admin, we removed some people that may have been there to prey on others. It was a problem, but I think our staff at the time handled it pretty well. We could only operate with what was reported, after all.

Anyone that may have posed a threat to the users of the site was almost always removed.
 
afounder said:
I am a co-founder, but I no longer operate the site.

The steps that we took to minimize that is to screen new members and encourage those that experience any type of weird behavior from someone to report them. Under my time as admin, we removed some people that may have been there to prey on others. It was a problem, but I think our staff at the time handled it pretty well. We could only operate with what was reported, after all.

Anyone that may have posed a threat to the users of the site was almost always removed.
Click to expand...
"screening new members" is a great line, but how effective is that in reality? Idk man, I almost wonder if there's actually a way to safely moderate something like this. KF is a retarded drama forum and the bullshit we deal with both internally and externally is already substantial, I can't imagine the delicacy necessary for something like this is insignificant. It's a lot of responsibility, even with the best of intentions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom