RU ‘Russophobia’ in the West will eventually decline – Kremlin

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

‘Russophobia’ in the West will eventually decline – Kremlin​

People in Western nations have been subjected to anti-Russian rhetoric for decades, and it will take time for attitudes to change, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

In an interview broadcast by the TV channel ‘Rossiya 1’ on Sunday, Peskov argued that some countries, including Germany and the Baltic states, have been using “Russophobia”as a means of diverting public attention from domestic issues.

“Their economic problems are obvious. The competitiveness of the famous German industry is declining. The cost of living is rising. The economic and social pressure is increasing,” which has prompted some some European leaders prefer to make a “bogeyman” out of Russia, the spokesman claimed.

He went on to say that “this Russophobia will have some inertia” and in “several decades it will likely pass.”

"Right now, Russophobia is at its peak. It will go down… It will happen someday, and common sense will gradually prevail."


Many Western countries have imposed sweeping sanctions on Moscow in response to its military operation in Ukraine, launched in February 2022. In addition to trade and financial restrictions, Russia has been barred from major cultural and sporting events.

In November, President Vladimir Putin said “Russophobia” has become the de facto “official ideology of the Western ruling elites.”

Last month, the Russian State Duma drafted a bill that would criminalize discrimination against Russian nationals living abroad, and “public incitement to extremism by international officials and public organizations.”
 
It's all about pattern recognition, really.

View attachment 5675705
Russia and Ukraine sit on a wide open undefensible plain. A forced march from Ukrainean border to Moscow takes less than a day, as was recently illustrated by the late Prigozhin's unsuccessful coup.

Russia was invaded from this direction in 1941 by Hitler, in 1812 by Napoleon, in 1708 by Charles XII of Sweden, in 1618 by Poland, etc, etc. Note that all of them were considered to be world superpowers at the time.

Having a belligerent US stage a coup and hand-pick the puppets for an anti-Russian government that immediately refused to extend Russia's lease on its Black Sea naval bases and started clamoring for NATO bases within a 24-hour march to Moscow on a historically indefensible border... after no less than 4 extremely successful invasions from there on a roughly 100 year cooldown...

Yeah. Not a good look.

Note that I am not saying the invasion was justified, I am merely pointing out that the reasons are fairly clear and not really nebulous.
Well lets just go down the list...

Prigozhin's "forced march" was on cars over a highway (and, just as a reference, I drove from Arkansas to Philadelphia in less than a day recently, so that statistic is meaningless) and while it in theory covered a distance greater in size than the length of France or Germany the bigger issue is that no-one in Russia deemed it fit to stop him. The idea that Russia deserves a 1000 mile buffer around Moscow is ridiculous and, among other things, really doesn't hold up well for Russia if, say, Poland, Finland, China, any of its neighbors really, demand the same thing.

Your statement that Europeans have invaded Russia from its western end is, well, what? Did you expect them to come from central Asia? You also conveniently leave out all of the times it was Russia or Russians doing the invading. From 1558 to 1700 to 1805 to 1917 to the present the Russians are always marching westward. Funny how you'd take wars that Russia started like the GNW or Third Coalition and damn the opposing side for daring to invade Russia after Russia had invaded them first. Clearly, under your retard logic, the only actual solution is to take everything west of the Volga since it is Russia's historic staging ground for westward invasions. And how dare those dastardly Europeans fight a war in Russia. What a uniquely Russian problem. You'd never see them fight a war in Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Austria. Those places never get invaded.

You're getting the US "coups" mixed up. It was after the Orange revolution that they didn't want to extend the basing agreement, Yanukovych solved that issue by signing it away for decades.

Ukraine had no near-term goal of joining NATO prior to the war, the government wasn't talking about it, public polling was against it and NATO itself did not want it at that time. Retard Russia really fucked that up though, now, didn't it.
 
Last edited:
the bigger issue is that no-one in Russia deemed it fit to stop him.
Bruh. They could not stop him and used civilizan bulldozers to block the highway in some places and civilizan excavators to destroy the highway in the others. They put up a barricade of tourist buses at one place. The local authorities were absolutely shitting themselves in panic and the government could not hit his columns with an artillery barrage because of all the civilians in the way. It was an absolute shitshow and I had friends who live in the southern areas of Moscow abandon their apartments because if the fighting broke out, their houses were likely to be hit.

You really don't know what you are talking about here.
 
Bruh. They could not stop him and used civilizan bulldozers to block the highway in some places and civilizan excavators to destroy the highway in the others. They put up a barricade of tourist buses at one place. The local authorities were absolutely shitting themselves in panic and the government could not hit his columns with an artillery barrange because of all the civilians in the way. It was an absolute shitshow and I had friends who live in the southern areas of Moscow abandon their apartments because if the fighting broke out, their houses were likely to be hit.

You really don't know what you are talking about here.
What you are saying is a fucking embarrassment and you should be ashamed to admit it. You couldn't clear a highway in six hours and you think thats normal? Jesus Christ, its a wonder the Ukrainians aren't in Moscow themselves by now.
 
What you are saying is a fucking embarrassment and you should be ashamed to admit it. You couldn't clear a highway in six hours and you think thats normal? Jesus Christ, its a wonder the Ukrainians aren't in Moscow themselves by now.
Why shoudn't I call a spade a spade? I call out a shitshow when I see it regardless of whether it is American, Russian or Ukrainian. Or Ugandan, for that matter.
 
I live in Western Europe as west as it get, and if it was up to me we would kick the USA out of our nation and go buddy up with Russia asap, and many here feel the same. With the blowing up of the Nordstream all favor toward the USA has nearly gone, and most of the real business people are already resuming trade with Russia. While Putin and Russia has a huge corruption problem, as long as you don't forget that you can do good business, while the USA can turn on you at the drop of a hat.
>blow up nordstream
>ban LNG exports to europe
Thanks Biden, truly our greatest ally
 
I think we can agree at this point that the US involvement in the events of 2014 is indisputable, as well as that it certainly worked to shape the coup. Apparently that was enough to make Putin say "fuck it" and flip the table.
No we can't lol. You're really clutching at straws here. We can agree that it's in America's interest if Ukraine has a pro-Western government and they're definitely trying to push things in that direction but you're trying to twist that into saying that America is solely responsible for toppling the former government which you cannot back up with solid evidence.

Let me restate it for you, America isn't the only country in the world that hates Russia and when other nations express disdain towards snow niggers it isn't because America forced them to. Consider the reality that maybe Russians really are fucking retarded and obnoxious and have an impressive track record of running any country they invade into the ground.
 
No we can't lol. You're really clutching at straws here. We can agree that it's in America's interest if Ukraine has a pro-Western government and they're definitely trying to push things in that direction but you're trying to twist that into saying that America is solely responsible for toppling the former government which you cannot back up with solid evidence.
I brought up several American politticians plainly admitting they were involved in changing the government in Ukraine. There is no confession that would be solid enough for you not to hand-wave.

Having said that, I never said America is "solely" responsible. You cannot conjure a coup out of thin air with no local support whatsoever. Ukraine has no shortage of political groups chomping at the bit to get back at "moskals", some of them openly nazist.

And yes, Putin's pretext of "denazification" is bullshit. Particularly because there is no way to say when the objective has been achieved.

Let me restate it for you, America isn't the only country in the world that hates Russia and when other nations express disdain towards snow niggers it isn't because America forced them to. Consider the reality that maybe Russians really are fucking retarded and obnoxious and have an impressive track record of running any country they invade into the ground.
Duly noted. Enjoy your day blissfully free of snow niggers.
 
Last edited:
I brought up several American politticians plainly admitting they were involved in changing the governenment in Ukraine. There is no confession that would be solid enough for you not to hand-wave.

Having said that, I never said America is "solely" responsible. You cannot conjure a coup out of thin air with no local support whatsoever.
There you go. "They were involved." That statement is not as damning as you think because this is common practice in politics whenever any unstable situation arises anywhere in the world, and every major world power, USA, Russia, China, the UK, all do everything in their power to skew outcomes in their own benefit. It is true, I agree with you on that.

You seem to be insinuating that without America's involvement the 2014 coup wouldn't have happened and/or would have failed (let's say just in removing Yanukovych, since the new government to replace him could have been anything without western involvement) which you just can't prove with what you've given me.
 
There you go. "They were involved." That statement is not as damning as you think because this is common practice in politics whenever any unstable situation arises anywhere in the world, and every major world power, USA, Russia, China, the UK, all do everything in their power to skew outcomes in their own benefit. It is true, I agree with you on that.

You seem to be insinuating that without America's involvement the 2014 coup wouldn't have happened and/or would have failed (let's say just in removing Yanukovych, since the new government to replace him could have been anything) which you just can't prove with what you've given me.
Oh, there is absolutely no way to tell which way the tiger would have jumped without the US involvement. Ukraininan political map in 2014 was an absolute minefield and the Ukrainians at large were infatuated with the idea of becoming a fully flegded EU member state with all the benefits that entails, so the chances of them leaning pro-EU and anti-Russia were extremely significant even without the US putting a finger on the scales.

If that hypothetical new government would have been less hostile towards Russia and the presence of its military bases in Sevastopol, history could have taken a very different turn. Or ended up absolutely the same because the Ukrainians had no shortange of resentment toward Russia since 1917 at the very least.

I am sure that fifty years from now there will be "what if" works of fiction written about this scenario.
 
Back
Top Bottom