RU ‘Russophobia’ in the West will eventually decline – Kremlin

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

‘Russophobia’ in the West will eventually decline – Kremlin​

People in Western nations have been subjected to anti-Russian rhetoric for decades, and it will take time for attitudes to change, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

In an interview broadcast by the TV channel ‘Rossiya 1’ on Sunday, Peskov argued that some countries, including Germany and the Baltic states, have been using “Russophobia”as a means of diverting public attention from domestic issues.

“Their economic problems are obvious. The competitiveness of the famous German industry is declining. The cost of living is rising. The economic and social pressure is increasing,” which has prompted some some European leaders prefer to make a “bogeyman” out of Russia, the spokesman claimed.

He went on to say that “this Russophobia will have some inertia” and in “several decades it will likely pass.”

"Right now, Russophobia is at its peak. It will go down… It will happen someday, and common sense will gradually prevail."


Many Western countries have imposed sweeping sanctions on Moscow in response to its military operation in Ukraine, launched in February 2022. In addition to trade and financial restrictions, Russia has been barred from major cultural and sporting events.

In November, President Vladimir Putin said “Russophobia” has become the de facto “official ideology of the Western ruling elites.”

Last month, the Russian State Duma drafted a bill that would criminalize discrimination against Russian nationals living abroad, and “public incitement to extremism by international officials and public organizations.”
 
How is "Russophobia" even a thing? I didn't think much of anything about Russkies until they invaded Ukraine for reasons that remain nebulous to this day.

I thought Russians were supposed to be tough thugs and not chronic whiners like Western SJWs.
 
for reasons that remain nebulous to this day.
It's all about pattern recognition, really.

2d6e2b593bc2c94576d3f.jpg
Russia and Ukraine sit on a wide open undefensible plain. A forced march from Ukrainean border to Moscow takes less than a day, as was recently illustrated by the late Prigozhin's unsuccessful coup.

Russia was invaded from this direction in 1941 by Hitler, in 1812 by Napoleon, in 1708 by Charles XII of Sweden, in 1618 by Poland, etc, etc. Note that all of them were considered to be world superpowers at the time.

Having a belligerent US stage a coup and hand-pick the puppets for an anti-Russian government that immediately refused to extend Russia's lease on its Black Sea naval bases and started clamoring for NATO bases within a 24-hour march to Moscow on a historically indefensible border... after no less than 4 extremely successful invasions from there on a roughly 100 year cooldown...

Yeah. Not a good look.

Note that I am not saying the invasion was justified, I am merely pointing out that the reasons are fairly clear and not really nebulous.
 
It's all about pattern recognition, really.

View attachment 5675705
Russia and Ukraine sit on a wide open undefensible plain. A forced march from Ukrainean border to Moscow takes less than a day, as was recently illustrated by the late Prigozhin's unsuccessful coup.

Russia was invaded from this direction in 1941 by Hitler, in 1812 by Napoleon, in 1708 by Charles XII of Sweden, in 1618 by Poland, etc, etc. Note that all of them were considered to be world superpowers at the time.

Having a belligerent US stage a coup and hand-pick the puppets for an anti-Russian government that immediately refused to extend Russia's lease on its Black Sea naval bases and started clamoring for NATO bases within a 24-hour march to Moscow on a historically indefensible border... after no less than 4 extremely successful invasions from there on a roughly 100 year cooldown...

Yeah. Not a good look.

Note that I am not saying the invasion was justified, I am merely pointing out that the reasons are fairly clear and not really nebulous.
So what are you saying, that the U.S. government was preparing for a ground invasion of Russia? What for?
 
It's all about pattern recognition, really.

View attachment 5675705
Russia and Ukraine sit on a wide open undefensible plain. A forced march from Ukrainean border to Moscow takes less than a day, as was recently illustrated by the late Prigozhin's unsuccessful coup.

Russia was invaded from this direction in 1941 by Hitler, in 1812 by Napoleon, in 1708 by Charles XII of Sweden, in 1618 by Poland, etc, etc. Note that all of them were considered to be world superpowers at the time.

Having a belligerent US stage a coup and hand-pick the puppets for an anti-Russian government that immediately refused to extend Russia's lease on its Black Sea naval bases and started clamoring for NATO bases within a 24-hour march to Moscow on a historically indefensible border... after no less than 4 extremely successful invasions from there on a roughly 100 year cooldown...

Yeah. Not a good look.

Note that I am not saying the invasion was justified, I am merely pointing out that the reasons are fairly clear and not really nebulous.
Interesting how the USA is both a degenerate bumbling idiot and a master tactician that will spawn their troops in the area without anyone noticing months beforehand.

Also a historically indefensible border that the Russians failrd to break the defences of for over two years.
 
Yeah, and pigs fly in Moscow.
It's all about pattern recognition, really.

View attachment 5675705
Russia and Ukraine sit on a wide open undefensible plain. A forced march from Ukrainean border to Moscow takes less than a day, as was recently illustrated by the late Prigozhin's unsuccessful coup.

Russia was invaded from this direction in 1941 by Hitler, in 1812 by Napoleon, in 1708 by Charles XII of Sweden, in 1618 by Poland, etc, etc. Note that all of them were considered to be world superpowers at the time.

Having a belligerent US stage a coup and hand-pick the puppets for an anti-Russian government that immediately refused to extend Russia's lease on its Black Sea naval bases and started clamoring for NATO bases within a 24-hour march to Moscow on a historically indefensible border... after no less than 4 extremely successful invasions from there on a roughly 100 year cooldown...

Yeah. Not a good look.
This is the type of retarded the Kremlin loves.
Just literally find any bullshit excuse to justify the war.
Note that I am not saying the invasion was justified, I am merely pointing out that the reasons are fairly clear and not really nebulous.
Yes you are.
It's like saying the nazis had concerns with the Jews and if the Jews were all dead, there'd be no concern. Note that I am not saying they should have killed all the Jews. I am merely pointing out that the the reasons are fairly bullshit and cope and seethe.
 
So what are you saying, that the U.S. government was preparing for a ground invasion of Russia? What for?
Nothing of the sort, no. What I am saying is that the US manufactured a threat that made Putin and his High Command all hot and bothered.

The nature of countries demand they prepare for any potential threat, no matter how probable or unlikely. For example, the US has contingencies for an alien invasion from space.

Perhaps the US intention was to force Russia to invade and discredit itself as an agressor, ruining its foreign diplomacy for the next fifty to seventy years, in which case mission accomplilshed.
 
Nothing of the sort, no. What I am saying is that the US manufactured a threat that made Putin and his High Command all hot and bothered.
What's your proof of this manufacturing? You do know the Ukrainian opposition really hated the Russian cum felching oligarch puppet that is Yanukovych, right? After the rebellion the US diplomats did everything to take advantage of the situation, which as shady as it appears is just what diplomats do, Russian ones included. Meanwhile Putin is still so butthurt about his butt buddy getting felted 10 years later he's started a literal war over it.

Russians need to understand that America's corruption and shady hegemonious practices don't excuse theirs, and "Russophobia" (lmfao) is a perfectly valid reaction to snownigger faggotry both on a geopolitical and an individual level.
 
Russophobia in the West will never die. All the justified fears of the Russians in the 50s led to the CIA and State Department being full of Eastern European neo-Nazis who will stop at nothing to see the Russian nation fragmented into fifty puppet states of America, each with their own made-up history (just like Ukraine and Belarusian dissidents promoted for their country), even to the point they'd make alliances with their age-old enemy the Jews. As long as there are dissidents against their control of the West, they will blame everything bad on Russians.
Note that I am not saying the invasion was justified, I am merely pointing out that the reasons are fairly clear and not really nebulous.
Very few wars in the past 30 years were as justified as the Russian liberation of the Ukraine.
 
A statement by senator Chris Murphy who at the time chaired the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on European Affairs.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=MrmPjR6XJkI
This isn't an admission of staging a coup. He's talking about what I said earlier, about diplomats pulling strings to take advantage of a preexisting situation. Russians are doing the same thing in Hungary and Slovakia right now.
 
This isn't an admission of staging a coup. He's talking about what I said earlier, about diplomats pulling strings to take advantage of a preexisting situation. Russians are doing the same thing in Hungary and Slovakia right now.
Right you are, then.

A quote from Victoria Nuland's interview to CNN in 2014:

NULAND: The United States has invested some $5 billion in Ukraine since 1991, when it became an independent state again after the collapse of the Soviet Union. And that money has been spent on supporting the aspirations of the Ukrainian people to have a strong, democratic government that represents their interests.

She then moves on to say "But we certainly didn't spend any money supporting the Maidan", which you will undoubtedly use as a means to discredit my statement because a politician would never, ever lie when pressed on an uncomfortable subject by a dogged interviewer. I'd like you to note that $5 billion is a lot of money and goes a very long way in an Eastern European country that at the time exchanged its currency 16 to 1, and that "supporting the aspirations of the Ukrainian people to have a strong, democratic government" can be a very menacing phrase in the correct context.

I think we can agree at this point that the US involvement in the events of 2014 is indisputable, as well as that it certainly worked to shape the coup. Apparently that was enough to make Putin say "fuck it" and flip the table.

Oh, and if Hungary and Slovakia have their own little coups and join the Russian sphere of influence (which is highly unlikely), I will be the first to admit they were influcenced by the Russian agents and money because this is indeed what the governments do. The only difference is that Russia is trying to sway the states on its immediate border and the US is trying to sway the states on the opposite side of the globe on the Russian border. It is the matter of domestic security for one and the matter of... heck if I know for the other.
 
Last edited:
I live in Western Europe as west as it get, and if it was up to me we would kick the USA out of our nation and go buddy up with Russia asap, and many here feel the same. With the blowing up of the Nordstream all favor toward the USA has nearly gone, and most of the real business people are already resuming trade with Russia. While Putin and Russia has a huge corruption problem, as long as you don't forget that you can do good business, while the USA can turn on you at the drop of a hat.
 
Back
Top Bottom