Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
That image is from Matilda, not the Twits. Roald Dahl also wrote some really creepy short horror stories.

I concur with others who have said that HP was simultaneously not that original or great but was also much better than similar books for kids when it came out. I was not that interested in HP when it first released, but around book 3 or so, I finally read the books and kept up as the rest came out. I was not the target audience, but I do occasionally read children's books as an adult (and read tons as a kid) and I thought they were pretty solid. Enjoyable story, plenty of funny bits, etc.. I've always thought the films were a mediocre adaptation, so I hope the TV show is better.

The writing that made me a fan of JKR was her tweets, not her books. It's a bit eerie how life imitated art with Harry constantly dealing with disinformation campaigns. Strange how her former fans ignore that part of the story. Or how they say Rita Skeeter was "transfemme coded" and precisely nothing about how JKR vilified the journalist and the press continuously in the books.
It's definitely from The Twits

Dunno if it's replicated in Matilda because I've not read that, but that image is 1000000% from The Twits

Anyway, Roald Dahl also wrote Danny the Champion of the World which is essential reading for any father who has a son. It's a beautiful piece about the father son relationship.
 
Anyway, Roald Dahl also wrote Danny the Champion of the World which is essential reading for any father who has a son. It's a beautiful piece about the father son relationship.

Hopefully not to digress too much, but another cool thing about that book is that it continues the British tradition of depicting poachers as heroes who defy the rich elite who hog all the wildlife to themselves, a tradition that started with Robin Hood.
 
I always enjoy click bait sites trying to tie themselves in knots to cover up the impacts of the social class divide.

HBO's upcoming Harry Potter reboot is giving Severus Snape a completely new origin story by officially casting Paapa Essiedu in the iconic role. While the British actor recently faced severe harassment over his casting in the anticipated series, the television network is actually making a brilliant narrative move by updating a classic character for a modern audience.
Stepping into a role previously defined by Alan Rickman remains a massive challenge for Essiedu, but this fresh creative direction could completely redefine the way viewers understand Snape’s childhood trauma. Bringing a person of color into this specific role provides a much clearer, grounded context for his isolation at Hogwarts, which can add even further layers to this already complex character.

How Does Snape's Identity Change Alter the Story Itself?​



The casting of Paapa Essiedu in the role of Severus Snape, who is defined in the book as a white male, doesn't necessarily alter the identity of this dark wizard that we know. However, it is expected to alter the origin story by structurally rewriting his lived experience to explain his lifelong emotional detachment.
The Harry Potter books indicate that Snape's bitterness stems almost entirely from his extreme poverty and his awkward status within a deeply elitist fantasy world. The reboot implies a much heavier version of this trauma by layering race onto his existing economic and social disadvantages. This marginalization could easily explain why his pain manifests as permanent resentment rather than just a temporary grudge.
Fans are no longer just looking at a kid who wears mismatched clothes and lives in a decaying industrial town called Cokeworth. They are looking at a brilliant outsider who never feels like he has an actual place in the highly privileged world of his classmates. Snape suffers from a massive tribal stigma that makes him one of the most immediate outcast characters in the story before he even sets foot inside the castle walls.

This layered exclusion resolves a massive gap in the character by giving him a highly tangible reason to build an impenetrable defensive shield. The upcoming television series, whose first look was recently released, may prove that he was not simply born cold but was actively shaped by a society that completely refused to let him in. Conventionally, we have seen Snape as one of the most complex fantasy characters, often going back and forth into the villain territory until his final moment, when all is revealed.
Snape essentially forges a completely new identity out of sheer desperation to survive an environment that constantly rejects his actual existence. Creating the Half-Blood Prince persona serves as his only viable survival mechanism. Fans often debate the specific origins of his bad attitude, but this casting forces audiences to view his behavior through a much more sympathetic lens.

Snape Was a Victim of Hogwarts’ Rigid Social System​


While Hogwarts is the biggest wizarding school in the world of the Harry Potter universe, it is also a toxic place. Harry was able to find friendship, companionship, love and purpose at that school because he was the ‘chosen one’ and his existence mattered. It eventually became his only home, but that was not the case for every outcast.
Hogwarts, at times, functions as a rigid social system that actively protects inherited privilege while masking it as a standard schoolhouse rivalry. Pure-blood supremacy operates as a direct analogue for the aristocracy, meaning characters from wealthy families are socially protected by the institution itself.
Wealthy students wield immense structural power, allowing them to dominate the social hierarchy without ever facing real consequences from faculty. This turns background worldbuilding into an active, dangerous force that directly shapes the psychology of marginalized students.

The backstory of Snape, which is most likely to be explored in the show, might take the audience into the 1970s Wizarding experience, where a racially distinct student navigating a pure-blood-obsessed society experiences a highly unique type of exclusion. We have witnessed how families like the Malfoys look down upon the Weasleys for their financial background and Hermione Granger for her Muggle parentage.
Watching a vulnerable kid try to survive in that incredibly hostile environment adds a deeply relatable dimension to his eventual dark turn. This will make Snape's deep connection with Lily Evans even more crucial to his basic survival. The reboot could easily explore how Lily’s genuine kindness provides the absolute only safe harbor he experiences during those formative years. While the rest of the school bullied Snape, her loyal friendship acts as a desperate lifeline for a completely isolated teenager.

Having a loyal friend who completely ignores the rigid social hierarchy makes the eventual loss of that relationship infinitely more devastating. The television series may frame her eventual alignment with the popular crowd not just as a standard romantic heartbreak, but as the total collapse of his only emotional sanctuary.
As fans, we knew that a big part of Snape’s soul died with Lily's, and from that day onward, we saw him through Harry’s POV only. This is the opportunity where the writers can go deep into Snape's darkest and most complicated lore that was never explored, and the questions that were never answered.

Harry Potter Reboot Must Explore Darkest Chapter of Snape’s Youth​


The HBO reboot also comes with an opportunity to show one of the most formative phases of Severus Snape’s life at Hogwarts. When Harry, for a brief moment, takes over Snape's memory in the Order of Phoenix, he sees a young James Potter ailing with his friends – Sirius Black, Remus Lupin and Peter Pettigrew – trying to bully a young Snape. That group of four friends was known as the Marauders.

According to the text, the Marauders were school bullies who used to target vulnerable students purely for their own entertainment. The original text explicitly describes their dynamic with the potions master as a terrifying predator and prey relationship rather than a mutual rivalry. Sirius Black literally treats the impoverished student like a rabbit to hunt whenever he feels bored between magical classes. This completely shatters the illusion that these popular Gryffindors are just harmless teenage pranksters having fun.
James Potter, on the other hand, orchestrates this public humiliation entirely to impress Lily and show off his absolute dominance over the school hierarchy. He happily hexes anyone walking down the corridors simply because he possesses the social capital to get away with it without facing any real discipline. The rest of the Marauders' gang members actively enable this severe behavior through their own deep-seated insecurities and desperate need for validation.

Placing a marginalized student of color into this exact crosshair makes the famous Pensieve memory deeply uncomfortable to watch. It forces fans to grapple with the reality that the heroic figures of the wizarding world actually operate in very dark shades of grey. This fresh perspective does not erase the terrible choices Snape makes later in life, but it perfectly contextualizes his massive resentment. He suffers from a total lack of protection, realizing early on that the adults in charge will never punish the cool kids for their cruelty.
Furthermore, the television adaptation is indeed taking a massive creative risk with this casting, but it provides a much more coherent explanation for a broken character. Despite the backlash and hate, Paapa Essiedu has decided to continue pursuing his role as Severus Snape and is committed to doing justice to the new perspective.
 
They're also doing it because it's become a point of debate in the several countries (including parts of the US), thanks to the left pandering to the muslim fear of dogs in public. The left adopts a dog-negative stance, so the right adopts a dog-positive stance. The troons are attempting to co-opt the dog-positive arguments to try and flank the anti-trans position by comparing themselves to dogs, which they think will create a cognitive dissonance. It's amateurish and retarded, but then it's what you'd expect from people who have literally shrunk their brains with mass doses of exogenous hormones.
It reminds me when some retard tranny harped on how the UK banning people from boiling lobsters alive meant that lobsters had more rights than trannies.

I certainly wish i could boil trannies alive
I always enjoy click bait sites trying to tie themselves in knots to cover up the impacts of the social class divide.
Damn, i saw some pictures about niggasnape but i didn't knew it was a reboot. Anyone thinks they will shoehorn a tranny character to spite JK or they will be too afraid to incite her anger so she withdraws her permission?

Also, love that now Snape's backstory will boil down to "Poor nigga got bullied for being a nigga".
 
Children's authors in the year 2000 were competing with Cartoon Network and Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2. Rowling won that competition, which says a ton about her sheer ability to entertain. The kids who were previously reading Hans Christian Andersen and Dickens were just as captivated as the kids who only read comic books. That's something special.
The incredible thing about Rowling's books for me is that their popularity grew by word of mouth among the kids. Adults didn't have a clue, and the publishing company was a small one that had next to no marketing budget. It wasn't until around the third book when grown-ups even noticed.
 
Dunno if it's replicated in Matilda because I've not read that, but that image is 1000000% from The Twits

To my recollection, it’s not replicated in Matilda, though there are similar themes of attractiveness being related to inner beauty and being a good person in your core.

Matilda’s mother is unattractive but covered in make up and believes herself to be beautiful as a result.

I mean, they'd be disgusting and unhygienic as food...

Even Fatrick Tomlinson doesn’t grind them up for trooneroni or anything similar.

And that creature is famous for consuming anything.

He could be a Roald Dahl villain, thinking about it.
 
I know there are concerns like Snape being raceswapped and whatever, but I hope this series succeeds just to prove a certain group of people wrong.
 
I know there are concerns like Snape being raceswapped and whatever, but I hope this series succeeds just to prove a certain group of people wrong.
It'll do massive numbers initially at least. In some tranny-free spaces I've only seen genuine excitement. I don't get it, but I was past the Harry Potter audience when it was released.
 
It'll do massive numbers initially at least. In some tranny-free spaces I've only seen genuine excitement.
I bet. They will porbably be on board with it and say it shits on Rowling's original work and that it's actually better, more inclusive and whatever buzzword they can think of.

In reality, they just want to spite her by saying "I like the idea but not how YOU do it because YOU are the problem."
It isn't but the author has used a headline and various statements as though they should be fact to try to claim so.
How much of a fucking ego does this retard need to be to think that? I swear, most writers today lack even a shred of humility
 
I always enjoy click bait sites trying to tie themselves in knots to cover up the impacts of the social class divide.
I believe Rowling is taking a more hands-off approach on the series vs the films, or she'd have shut this down before it started. Right now, she's got her activism and her strike series to keep her busy; HBO Potter is just more money in the bank and a finger in the eye of the troon, so what does it matter if they change a few details?

If anyone calls her out on it in a way she can't ignore, she'll probably play the standard lib card of "it doesn't matter", or"how does it affect you", but I think she'll just try to avoid addressing it a all if she can. I also I think she'll regret these changes in the long term, once she realises just how much they've molested the original work, but that would be a long time coming. I just hope she doesn't end up in a Rihanna Pratchett situation, where the end product becomes something she actively hates.
 
Prediction: they are not going to change anything about Snape's story. He'll just be played by a black actor and that'll be fine.

According to the text, the Marauders were school bullies who used to target vulnerable students purely for their own entertainment.

Eeeh, no. They are seen picking on Snape only, who is basically a creepy nerd who sucks up to the real school bullies, the ones that go on becoming murderers. They are just making shit up.
 
They have to make weird dog-killing comparisons because whenever they list what Rowling has actually said/done she comes across as a total normie to everyone outside Reddit

View attachment 8802379

I like the last item on the list. Blaming her for BlueSky, a tranny hugbox, banning trannies because of their own violent behaviour really sums those losers up.
 
I like the last item on the list. Blaming her for BlueSky, a tranny hugbox, banning trannies because of their own violent behaviour really sums those losers up.
Also they meant "for", not "after" wishing ill. Basic sentence logic: it was the trans authors not Bluesky that "wished ill".

The whole thing brings this to mind:

1775317613831.png
 
The troons are attempting to co-opt the dog-positive arguments to try and flank the anti-trans position by comparing themselves to dogs, which they think will create a cognitive dissonance.
But how can they reconcile this with their idea that realizing that shitbulls are murderous niggerdogs is racist? Are they just going to become openly RACIST?
 
It's definitely from The Twits

Dunno if it's replicated in Matilda because I've not read that, but that image is 1000000% from The Twits
I just re-read Matilda (charming, as always) and you're right. I am having a Mandela effect spiral over why I was so convinced otherwise. Must be the illustrator's style threw me off? Also, I have never read The Twits, should probably do that ASAP.
 
This part is exactly why it became such a huge success and got 100% of children to fucking read, even in North America. You couldn't pay western children in the 80s and 90s to read books until HP came out.
I never got into HP but it makes me MATI how they downplay her accomplishments. I give the younger ones a little bit of a pass because they don’t remember the Before Times™️ and don’t understand her impact but holy shit, people were lining up at midnight trying to get their hands on these books. Of course kids read before HP, but the way this caught on was very special.
IMG_0008.jpeg
Damn why did she do that
IMG_0010.jpeg
Is this a bunnygirl and not a catgirl or puppygirl? They’re branching out!
IMG_0009.jpeg
OF COURSE THIS IS THE PINNED TWEET
IMG_0012.jpeg
I am once again asking troons to clean and brush their hair and wear clothes that fit.

Lithgow decides to step off of the fence just a little bit and now he’s Hitler. I hope this teaches him and other actors a lesson. Nothing is ever good enough for troons, it’s not worth trying to placate them at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom