Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A lot of them are also just too young and ignorant to understand romanization of Asian names was much less standardized back in the 80s/90s. "Cho" and "Chang" probably aren't strictly pinyin and could be a lot of different names (as it happens, the chink translations have her as family name Zhang, given name Qiu, which are pronounced pretty close to "chang" and "cho".)
I wonder if most of the Chinese in Britain around the time Rowling grew up speaking Cantonese is a part of things and everyone dumping on her in current year is more familiar with Mandarin speaking Chinese people.
 
I wonder if most of the Chinese in Britain around the time Rowling grew up speaking Cantonese is a part of things and everyone dumping on her in current year is more familiar with Mandarin speaking Chinese people.
It would make sense, since most of the trannies mad at her are American (or just highly-Americanized from being too online) and we don't get a ton of Hong Kongers the same way the UK does.
 
Bluesky absolutely cannot shut up about the trailer. This is how you know it's a for-reals civil rights movement, 90% of its "activists" spending 90% of their time fussing about a kid's book. It's like if MLKJr devoted his Washington speech to complaining about how there weren't any black Munchkins.
 
Where you find these people in real life? I never thought they actually existed
One of my colleagues is somewhat like that, chubby girl studying for a useless degree, she shared anti-rowling posts by someone called bimboficationdoll or some shit like that.

For some reason young, unattractive women are drawn to shit like that, the pretty, normie girls I know might not even know about Rowlings terfiness
 
Last edited:
One of my colleagues is somewhat like that, chubby girl studying for a useless degree, she shared anti-rowling posts by someone called bimboficationdoll or some shit like that.

For some reason young, unattractive women are drawn to shit like that, the pretty, normie girls I know might do not even know about Rowlings terfiness
Conservatives are more attractive and consider broader ranges of thought than Liberals do.
Rowling herself is more of a Liberal, except for her stance on Transgenderism, but her anti-Transgenderism stance would be considered a "Conservative" stance, and it's Conservatives who are more likely to not give a fuck about the discourse surrounding Rowling's beliefs.

conservativeattractiveness.png
Article Link, Studies article references: [1], [2]
60zxfkbg3ubf1.jpeg
Link to study
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of grown adults that are really upset by this
1774481301998.png
1774481496686.png
1774481527713.png
1774481558534.png
Adults with arrested development who are obsessed over the opinions of a children's writer who are so opposed to this new show that they're stooping to attacking black people and literal children. Smells like a perfect storm.
 
One half of the HP fandom was made up of annoying but relatively harmless shippers who fought over which boy their self insert (usually Hermione) would end up with.

The other half was made up of deranged Remus/Sirius fangirls and fujoshis who were into any category of sexual depravity you could imagine. Also way too many adult/minor pairings were disturbingly popular, like Draco Malfoy x his own father, Snape x Hermione, and Harry x Sirius.
I remember the fanfictions that saturated the dark underbelly of the internet back then. One story had Harry and Voldemort ("reformed") going back in time to younger bodies. You can guess how they ended up. One chapter had them in a private room, naked while lying in bed and sipping champagne. Yes, you read that right and I'm sorry. 😐
 
It's because "Cho" and "Chang" are apparently two different Asian last names put together, as opposed to a first name and last name.
Already explained this one.

 
Already explained this one.
Thank you Mx. Teriyakiburns. You must be the reason the thought popped into my head.
The absolute insane reach this new teaser got will cause mass trans suicide.
I'm not going to watch it since I was too old when the book came out. But you better believe I will have episodes on in another room as a small act of rebellion against the Trans Menace.
t4wfs4c977hc1.jpeg

I hope this show is Hogwarts Legacy 2.0
 
I've been seeing people make fun of Rowling for having an Asian character with an Asian name for years. Why exactly is this a bad thing? Why is it bad for an Asian character with a presumably Asian family to have a name that is common for people with her nationality/ethnicity?
It is very simple: Cho Chang is not a credible Chinese name (it doesn't say anywhere her family is Chinese) and so that is racist because of reasons (we hate that bitch).
Inversely, Seamus Finnigan is a credible Irish name and so that also is racist because of opposite reasons (we hate that bitch).

You got that?
 
Someone else mentioned a mongoose and I approve of this. If I had better drawing skills I would sketch a flag-colored mongoose lol
Now this is slightly off topic but I'm aware that the significance of the mongoose to trannies is that it's an anti-libertarian thing, mongoose hunt snakes, the Gadsden Flag has a snake on it.

Libertarians are, by far, THE most trans-friendly permutation of right wing thought. If you were to refine the ideology down to lolbertinium concentrate or whatever there's no particular logical or moral reason to hate trannies in it. Yet libertarianism is equivocated to actual "send the deviants to the camps" national socialism over and over by them, why?

I believe it's actually a little crack in the facade, because under the NAP there's nothing wrong with being transgender nor seeking "treatments" in whatever form they may take. Hell, trannies will go to Mengele-tier butchers for surgeries already so it's not like they'd have a problem with removing government regulations. In fact, if you just get rid of the government entirely there's no entity with a monopoly of force to enact that ever looming "trans genocide" I keep hearing about. If trannies were really about just wanting to become True and Honest girls/boys, they'd all be hardcore lolberts.

Buuuuut, the thing about the NAP is that you can't use force to enact what you want. How people talk about you, including your pronouns, is entirely based on their respect for you. You can't use threats of violence and drowning people in lawsuits under bullshit hate laws to get your way. You can't hustle drugs onto children or take them from their parents for not bending to troonism either, because despite the jokes everyone except the most retarded of lolberts knows children cannot give meaningful consent.

In summary, they hate libertarians because they'd solve all of their stated grievances and give none of what they actually want (that being unquestionable and unassailable social/legal power to rape children). Thank you for reading my blogpost.

Edit: Also, frankly, the difference between the SS sending all trannies to death camps for being trans and small communities lynching the local troon for some unspeakably vile act would be largely academic, a matter of proactive measures and reactive measures really.
 
Last edited:
I'm convinced Bluesky users all have lobotomies. Epstein mentions wanting to see the Harry Potter play in an email once and now they're accusing Rowling of having been to the island diddling children. Rowling never even spoke to Epstein. Why would she be funding rape victim shelters if she was pro-child rape? The only people I see constantly defending pedophilia are trannies.

 
It is very simple: Cho Chang is not a credible Chinese name (it doesn't say anywhere her family is Chinese) and so that is racist because of reasons (we hate that bitch).
Inversely, Seamus Finnigan is a credible Irish name and so that also is racist because of opposite reasons (we hate that bitch).

You got that?

Is Hermione a credible British name? JK added all sorts of unusual first names for the characters in her work of fiction. Wouldn't it be racist to assume that Asian parents can't give their kids unusual names?
 
When compared with Josh Whedon, who actually abused women, Rowling is still orders of magnitude worse.
whedon.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom