Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[Sneedmason]

The men these women fuck in exchange for movie roles talk about them in a much nicer way than you do. They're the ones who created the fuck-for-work industry and speak to their whores like the human employees they are.
But you decide to direct your rage at a woman agreeing to an exchange and then fulfilled her part of the exchange. Why? Because you are angry with the powerful men you have no hope of competing with. You're taking it out on the ladies the same way the Irish took it out on the blacks on plantations in the USA.
Maybe if you learned a skill that makes money, or learned to gamble the stock market, you'd have the money needed to buy your own casting couch.

Cope.

The ball was in the woman's court here, the men only got power because the woman accepted it. A simple "no", and you wouldn't have this problem. They had the leverage at the moment and fucked it up.

 

[Swine Schwein]

This performative feminine behavior makes my balls retract into my pelvis

Yeah dude, mine too bro

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

The entire point of Harry living in Surrey is that he hates it there and feels out of place. Making Harry black makes no sense not because of where his aunt and uncle live, but because one of his parents is a pureblood British wizard and the other one is a pale redhead with a blonde sister.

The entire point of Harry being in Surrey is JK Rowling also lived in that area. Harry borrows from what Rowling knows and feels: she knows what it feels like to grow up in lower-class England, aspiring to something greater and realizing she has an innate talent to develop (being an author, becoming a wizard.) Being black doesn't fit into this at all. But we're also discussing Hermione, who can't be black because she gets good grades anyway.

 

[Jex]

When I saw that Watson apology it didn’t come off as sincere to me, which is strange considering she’s supposedly a world class actress. Good job JK, fuck them. Never forgive never forget.

 

[CTR Operative]

Extremely common JKR W. Beautifully said. Meanwhile in lib spaces I frequent people are calling it "unhinged" and steelmanning Watson, and I can't tell it's because they're genuinely stupid enough to think this was a "sincere attempt at moving forward," like one idiot said, or they just want to fuck Emma Watson.

 

[Maverick Vile]

This "I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous" line really sums up the egotistical, ridiculous view she has on the entire situation. She clearly thinks these successful 30+ year old actors should just shut the fuck up and be grateful to her forever because she wrote the books that movies they were cast in as children were based on, as if she came down from the heavens and gifted them with millions of unearned dollars and now they're stabbing her in the back by saying they don't agree with her unhinged half-decade meltdown when asked about it.

Is it at all inaccurate, though? No one would give a shit about these actors had they not received a golden ticket from Rowling signing off on their inclusion into the Potterverse, especially Emma Watson, who made it clear in her terrible performance in Beauty and the Beast that she wasn't playing a character with Hermoine, she was just naturally an insufferable know-it-all. Rowling even says the notion that they should agree with her on everything because she made their careers is stupid, but there is something to be said about spitting in the face of someone who is directly responsible for your position as a millionaire celebrity who will never want for anything, ever.

No it doesn't, you autist.
The expression is 'change of tack'. There is no such expression as 'change of tact' - if you're saying 'change of tact', you're saying it wrong.

Christ, mistakes like this must be a diamond dozen where you come from.

I'll admit it, you had me in the first half.

I am firmly, decidedly against the trans dumpster fire that has plagued our country, but we all need to be honest about one thing:
The feminist + race rhetoric from somewhere around the 90's and onward is undeniably a huge component the trans movement. Rowling herself has been complicit in promoting it, leading to the very thing she's been fighting now for years.

That's why I think it's important to remind Rowling of the "Emma finds it easy to defend sexpests because she'll never have to live around them," argument she made the next time she defends the UK jeet in chief's decision to import infinity Indians.

Look, I agree that Rowling has no obligation to forgive Watson, but can we not refer to a former child actress as "Weinstein's little fleshlight?"

Why not? It's what she decided to become. This was a decision she made when she was of age and already filthy rich from making millions as a Potter star. It wasn't good enough for her, so she whored herself out to Hollywood in exchange for accolades and access. "Yes, Mr. Weinstein, you can ram your probably-egg-shaped cock down my throat, if I get to be Belle in the Disney remake of Beauty and the Beast." Women are morally-capable agents who can choose to act in whatever manner they choose according to their desires, and Emma Watson desired fame and fortune in excess of the already considerable fame and fortune of her current station more than she wanted to not be the cocksleeve of a notorious Hollywood sexpest. She is Hermoine Granger, any time she needs to scare up some cash for bauble that catches her eye, she can quite easily find a local convention, ask the organizers if they want Emma-fucking-Watson at their con, and make an easy 20k in a weekend as people trip over themselves to throw money at her for gracing them with her presence while she swishes and flicks a toy wand around. No normal person in her position would willingly allow themselves to be the latest piece of meat for Harvey Weinstein. It's really easy to look at a gross Hollywood goblin like Weinstein and say, "how reprehensible of him to exchange sex for stardom!" But no one ever seems to consider how disgusting it is for Emma Watson to use her body as a bargaining chip to get things out of the disgusting sweaty Hollywood goblin, not just because of how gross it is to imagine Weinstein flopping on top of Emma Watson like a beached whale trying to get back to the ocean, but because it says to all the other gross goblins out in the industry, "Yes, this is normal and even acceptable behavior. Gorgeous women will have sex with you if you can make their career. They'll even put your penis in their mouth!"

 

[Hitman One]

She really is a Kung Fu master with the English language

While nobody can deny their success, the literary merits of the Harry Potter books are perhaps limited. Rowling however is a very good author and she has a distinctive "voice" when writing. I remember how impressed I was with the construction (on a technical level) and content of her first adult novel The Casual Vacancy.

 

[Team TERF]

I remember that period of time when she tried so hard to distance herself from Harry Potter that she got cast in a bunch of R-rated nonsense like This is the End, only to come crawling back to the family-friendly scene with the live-action Beauty and the Beast, proving that no amount of auto-tune can make that voice song-worthy.

I heard that she ran to this after being unceremoniously fired from La La Land, which earned the far more talented Emma an Oscar.

Now, Stone is no Mariah Carey, but I shudder to think of how badly Watson would have butchered "Audition."

 

[AI generated waifu]

Batten down the hatches, girlies!

View attachment 7976016View attachment 7976015

Hope they don't lock up this hilarious subreddit.

Sometimes it strikes me that when you think of misogyny you think of the taliban, when you think of racism you think of the KKK, when you think of antisemitism you think of the holocaust. But this is the face of transphobia: a liberal children's book writer who doesn't want you dead, she just wants you to have mental health support.

 

[TheLastFrogger]

Daniel Radcliffe still seems to roll around Hollywood doing some odd jobs and shilling The Trevor Project while, let's be honest, being a mediocre actor with no real references outside of Harry Potter.

When I was younger I would have though Robert Pattinson would have been the washed up actor, how wrong I was. Pattinson has been killing it out there, really showed he wanted to be more than just the Twilight guy.

 

[Retink Retunk]

Extremely common JKR W. Beautifully said. Meanwhile in lib spaces I frequent people are calling it "unhinged" and steelmanning Watson, and I can't tell it's because they're genuinely stupid enough to think this was a "sincere attempt at moving forward," like one idiot said, or they just want to fuck Emma Watson.

There's always option three, it's all team sports and they will cheer on their side while booing the other regardless of what each side is doing.

 

[Dr. Butt]

Radcliff going to fuck a horse.

Anyone who says that a kid running around naked is the disturbing part of Equus hasn't seen the play.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

It's kind of funny that Trannies live inside a world of complete delusion, complete childish escapism; that they have essentially tried turning Rowling into Vagina-Hitler when she said 'ew' to a man in a mini skirt with his hairy balls in display. She's literally on the side of libshit nonsense for pretty much everything else; and because she went 'oh fuck gross!' to a cock in a frock they want to literally murder her.

It'd be funny if it weren't so alarming. Troons have no loyalty or principles beyond "I want to engage in escapist coomery!". If tomorrow Hitler came back from his villa in Argentina and declared the 4th Reich; but also offhandedly said "Trannies welcome lmao." Then they'd be in badly fitting womens SS gear before you could say "Autogynephilic weirdos get the rope!"

EDIT: Large parts of our societal infrastructure are held hostage by dead eyed chronic masturbators wearing schoolgirl outfits; and we're not allowed to just hang them. Madness.

 

[parody]

The best part about JK Rowling having become the Antichrist of the left is that she was one of the most influential, vocal and (arguably) fair people for the left; she agreed with 99.9% of leftist views, causes, ... but she drew the line on calling men in dresses women, for this cardinal Sin she has become the #1 enemy in Leftist circles, and probably the most famous case when 'eaten by their own kind' comes to mind.

I know we're all mostly sympathetic to Rowling here, but a part of me loves to see this kind of thing happen to aging leftists. It's the closest we'll ever get to seeing them realize in real time that they devoted their lives to fighting for the wrong side. A lot of the not-famous leftists of today will likely experience a similar end eventually, except they won't have a billion dollars to protect them.

 

[Morethanabitfoolish]

For example, in a world of magic, why are you using one of the slowest flying nocturnal birds to deliver messages? I know this is a meme, but this kind of inconsistency is indicative of her entire world. Things are written because they are fantastical and capture the imagination.

You answered your own question about "why use owls" right there. However there's also a non-zero chance it's a reference to the Owl Service by Alan Garner which while not about a postal service sounds like it could be.

 

[JustStopDude]

I remember that period of time when she tried so hard to distance herself from Harry Potter that she got cast in a bunch of R-rated nonsense like This is the End, only to come crawling back to the family-friendly scene with the live-action Beauty and the Beast, proving that no amount of auto-tune can make that voice song-worthy.

That isn't unique to Emma Watson. There are countless actors and actresses that tried to escape an original role and can't.

A prime example is actress Elizabeth Berkley, who went so far as appearing in "Show Girls" to try and get work after "Saved By the Bell".

 

[NoReturn]

To be fair to her, Emma Watson talked about her recently (last week I believe); so JKR had every right to respond.

5jB5yP08LDFTrtda.mp4

"There's just no world in which I could ever cancel her out or cancel that out for anything. It has to remain true. It is true. And this is where this like, holding of these, I just don't know what else to do other than hold these two seemingly incompatible things together at the same time and just hope maybe they will one day resolve or like, conjoin themselves and maybe accept that they never will but that they can both still be true and I can love her." - Emma Watson, 2025

View attachment 7976766
https://archive.ph/r2mbC
Without Harry Potter, Emma wouldn't be shit. She knows that and that is why she continues to use Rowling as a prop to advertise herself, be it as a trannygender rights advocate or as a tolerant person who loves even those who disagree with her.

You know, back in the day we have coming-of-age ceremonies for a reason, and I think that situation has gotten all fucked up.
If you were a woman, it didn't really matter if you were younger than your auntie, once you were accepted as a "woman" in the eyes of the tribe, you had the same rights and responsibilities as other women. Sure, you were supposed to respect older women, and respect your own family, but I think the lack of "You are an adult now" in modern society has contributed a lot to the millennial puer aeterni curse.
Like @behindyourightnow has pointed out already, the Harry Potter cast seems to see Rowling as their surrogate mother, and they treat her as such. They never really developed an adult relationship with her in the same way many people these days never developed an adult relationship with their own parents.

 

[teriyakiburns]

I watched Nuns on the Run this weekend. Robbie was great. Odd seeing him so young. It was on cytube

You should check out Cracker. He's great in that too, from an entirely different angle.

 

[Ahriman]

View attachment 7976205
Emma Watson's career is only thanks to JK Rowling. She later threw JK Rowling under the bus for Harvey Weinstein, thinking that would advance her career in Hollywood.

Age is not an excuse, and in her case, now that she's 35, she ought to know better but she doesn't.

Queen TERF keeps winning.

 

[Captain Manning]

True, but Voltaire was a faggot Prussian simp.

I mean, maybe. But the fact of the matter is he was certainly right about that one quote I shared.

Just like Rowling is 100% right when it comes to the transgender issue.

When you're right, you're right.

While nobody can deny their success, the literary merits of the Harry Potter books are perhaps limited.

The literary value of the Harry Potter books is they got kids to read. That's enough, I think.