Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Not defending Kike Weinstein, but being 19 is not being a kid, you are a fully grown adult. This adult infantilization psyop is retarded, she sucked his dick because she was a shitty actor. Even the guy who played Snape hinted at this. Name a single notable role she's had afterwards. As retarded as she was, grifted around with feminism and now when trannys are ruining that sphere, she's now stuck because she's an hoe opportunist.

I hope the trannys eat her alive. We need more examples of these untalented whores being put on full display, so people (mostly women in this case) think twice before grifting retarded ideologies.
"A woman used to sex to pay for something and I am SEETHING because I don't have anything she wants to buy"

The men these women fuck in exchange for movie roles talk about them in a much nicer way than you do. They're the ones who created the fuck-for-work industry and speak to their whores like the human employees they are.
But you decide to direct your rage at a woman who agreed to an exchange and then fulfilled her part of the exchange. Why? Because you are angry with the powerful men you have no hope of competing with. You're taking it out on the ladies the same way the Irish took it out on the blacks on plantations in the USA.
Maybe if you learned a skill that makes money, or learned to gamble the stock market, you'd have the money needed to buy your own casting couch.
She's a feminist so she will never mention the rape gangs
You have such a great avatar but ruin it by being illiterate. Y u refuse to even read what feminists actually say even when they say it directly to you on this very website. Since when is a fEmInIsT pro-rape? You been talking to troons??
 
Last edited:
It was atrocious. Stilted acting, over busy designs, and a complete failure to grasp the characters and their romance. I wanted Gaston to win.

The whole teaching the girls to read was Watsons thing because she was trying to push world wide literacy for girls (a fine goal) in clueless, elite ways such as making it a theme for a movie those girls and their families would never see.

The original Belle character was not considered odd by the locals for reading, but for obsessively reading fantasy and having an eccentric father and even then she was still liked.

What's even more insulting towards the legacy of Beauty and the Beast is the oldest written version was WRITTEN BY A WOMAN. IN FRANCE. PRIOR TO THE SETTINGS APPROXIMATE TIME PERIOD.

"Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve was the French author who wrote the oldest known version of the fairy tale Beauty and the Beast (La Belle et la Bête), first published in 1740 in the anthology La jeune américaine, et les contes marins."

I didn't even pay to see the movie and I'm still furious.
Also, fun historical fact: by the 18th century in France, women reading wasn’t seen as some anomaly like it’s portrayed in the live action Beauty and the Beast. Literacy was still much lower compared to today, but women, especially well to do women, had these salons where they would discuss various books and journals of the time period, and is sometimes overlooked, as a lot of the French Enlightenment got credited towards men. The women wouldn’t merely discuss things either, and would try to directly influence politics. The part about men scoffing at a woman reading honestly made me a bit mad watching the live action movie, because it was ahistorical. In trying to make it have more “girl power,” the directors and producers essentially erased women’s accomplishments of the time. I don’t expect fantasy movies to be documentaries of whatever time period they were from, but since the live action tried to ground itself more in reality, you’d think there would be more attention to details like that.
 
Both Harry and Ron’s characters were given a pretty raw deal in the movies. Harry existed as some wonder kid with little idea on how the wizarding world worked, while Ron was treated like an idiot that couldn’t control his emotions. Meanwhile, Hermione was made to be gifted at everything except Defense against the Dark Arts, and conveniently figured out most of the mysteries for Harry and Ron to act upon. Hermione was made into a Mary Sue type character before Mary Sue types really took off in the 2010s.

You bring up a good point that there could have just been a fair amount of executive meddling in the movies, especially for the budget they were given. IIRC, JKR had a lot of say on the casting decisions, but it could be possible that the way characters got portrayed was more in the realm of what the directors and producers wanted at the time. She was a best selling author by the time of the first movie, but she didn’t have nearly the amount of money she does today because of the royalties and merchandising.
This can mostly be attributed to the screenwriter of all the HP movies except one, Steve Kloves. His favorite character was Hermoine so there's a huge bias in all the scripts towards her character for no particularly good reason.
 
For the life of me I never understood why she had to turn to being Weinstein’s little fleshlight.

It’s not like she’s some ditzy naive farm girl from Nebraska. Her dad has been a powerful lawyer since the turn of the century. Born with a silver spoon in her mouth, a package of 70 million GBP from HP before inflation, she could've parlayed that and her dad's influence into any role she ever dreamed of. What a cheap-ass cunt.
The rumor is that Emma fucked Weinstein because of his political connections. Weinstein was 100% in bed with the Clintons and Obamas, to the point that they would routinely give him talking points to pass along to big name actors to shill for the DNC along with being a bagman passing along illegal under the table campaign donations to the DNC. Basically Emma wanted to get into politics and letting Weinstein fuck her was supposed to enable this.
 
No it wasn't. Those books made millions of children read, and read a lot. It's a pretty big miracle seeing your nine year old drop all screens and games and read a 500 page book and then anothet. If you know of any other books who can do it, please tell us.
Rowling spinned a yarn like possibly no other writer we've ever seen, but from having read all those books I can tell you it was all done on the fly. Stuff like "jews went to Hogwarts" and "Dumbledore is gay" was all off the cuff, and she sticks with it, that's what's she's good at. Her entire story is off the cuff. She didn't spend weeks agonizing over secret backstory and plots the reader would never read or be made aware of, she didn't develop entire languages and cultures spanning hundreds of years for her eyes only. She's not Tolkien or Martin in this regard.

For example, in a world of magic, why are you using one of the slowest flying nocturnal birds to deliver messages? I know this is a meme, but this kind of inconsistency is indicative of her entire world. Things are written because they are fantastical and capture the imagination.

She's might be the greatest literary bullshit artist the world has ever seen and her story hooked an entire generation of children and generations of children to come, but the world it takes place in is shallow as fuck. I think there's a lot of artistry in that, considering all of the careful planning other writers have had to commit to in order to have the same lasting cultural impact.
 
Lol Watson is such a slippery little snake. Only trying to bury the hatchet after public opinion starts to turn against trannies.
Weathervanes are the most disgusting people. Literally just switch one dick for the other depending on where the wind is blowing. They allow such bullshit to happen through their complicity.

I'm glad JKR finally spoke out. I really like her take that it was hard to speak out against children you literally knew when they were 10. It's such a human and motherly take, none of these synthetic hollywood prostitutes will ever comprehend.
 
When I was a kid, I loved fantasy novels and was a die-hard Harry Potter fan. I read her website blog and her writings on Pottermore whenever she released them, and really admired her as a person, to where over my childhood bookshelf I wrote "J K ROWLING ROCKS !!!" out in those block letter stickers. Her blog was extremely sweet and helpful. Often she would write about social issues affecting young girls like body image, education, courage, etc. So I was just reading her content normally the day she released her first essay/letter about transgenderism.

What blows me away most about shit like that /r/MTF post about an adult man who literally couldn't cope+live at her mere mention, is that this first essay was extremely empathetic and gentle. It was elegant, it was person-first, and it was ultimately the most tame take you could ever have on the issue. Unfortunately, because she was among the first of the famous to speak out, and because she was particularly loved by the awkward bookworm kids that ended up trooning out, she was absolutely fucking crucified. Some of her later tweets were a little more extreme, but frankly the dogs chased her into the corner. Yet despite the vitriol, she still manages to come out with elegant takes on what are ugly and despicable issues. If a horde of violent crossdressing men started threatening my hypothetical kids, I would be calling for TTD on national television.

I don't agree with her on a number of feminist issues, but I understand that her ideas are informed by being extremely vulnerable in her marriage and divorce to what was obviously a contemptible man. She is an extremely kind and well-spoken woman, which is better than these gross cretins deserve.
 
Last edited:
@JambledUpWords
Exactly. In its eagerness to flaunt its "virtues " it erased the actual accomplishments of real women and besmirched the actual advancement of France at that time. No one crushes the gains of the underprivileged like rich, clueless Hollywood elite.
 
Something that always struck me and in a way turned me off of the whole Harry Potter thing was when I got to I think it was the fourth movie and Emma Watson was basically a teenager at that point.

I had dated enough girls by that point to take one look at her and go oh she's a piece of shit. I didn't see Hermione Granger I saw Emma Watson as a screen hungry actress already full in the throws of narcissism. The face that she makes in that fourth movie in almost every scene is a direct correlation to every BPD psychotic female I had ever met.

It feels really good to know that I called that as a teenager and reinforced my own understandings as to who to be and not to be attracted to.
"If she grimace while filming her 27th take of a greenscreen fight with a CGI Dementor, she a hoe!"
 
Last edited:
Kinda feel like im flailing fatly against the tide here but I still remember JK marching side by side with the shrieking censorship mob with regards to silencing internet mockery/criticism under the pretext of "stopping hate speech and muh harassment" right until the moment a critical mass of troons denounced her for badthink and the rest of the mob quickly tore in to her when she failed to produce the grovelling perpetual apology demanded of her
Man, all I remember is getting pissed off at her as a kid for ruining Dumbledore when the "Dumbledore is a faggot" saga began. I dropped HP, never read the last book and stopped caring about her because of it.
Then fast forward to the troon saga and she became relevant again. Could have 100% fully missed the "shrieking censorship mob" arc because that's something I'd fully expect someone who turned Dumbledore into a faggot to do and thus didn't care :story:
 
Batten down the hatches, girlies!

View attachment 7976016View attachment 7976015

Hope they don't lock up this hilarious subreddit.
downloadfile (1)_1.webp
This performative feminine behavior makes my balls retract into my pelvis

I remember that period of time when she tried so hard to distance herself from Harry Potter that she got cast in a bunch of R-rated nonsense like This is the End, only to come crawling back to the family-friendly scene with the live-action Beauty and the Beast, proving that no amount of auto-tune can make that voice song-worthy.
She should have done full nudes, at least I'd be entertained.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You have such a great avatar but ruin it by refusing to even read what feminists actually say even when they say it directly to you on this very website. Since when is a fEmInIsT pro-rape? You been talking to troons??
There is absolutely a contingent of self-proclaimed feminists who are pro-rapegang. They take some circuitous route through critical intersectional theory to get there, but I have to take their writings as genuine feminist thought because there is no pope to declare it heresy.

You're right that it's a troon position though, almost 1:1 overlap between pro-rape feminists and pro-troon feminists.
 
I'm not going to get into stupid feminist word games. I assure you British "feminists" are firmly on the rape gangs side of things.
Rich ladies think poor ladies deserve to be raped. Those little tarts aren't humans and probably loved geting fucked in 3 holes at once already. They were created by God to be sex practice cum dumpsters for good little public school boys. Otherwise, why else would they have been born to working-class parents? Everyone knows that your quality as a person is determined by your station at birth and no matter how hard those girls work or how much education they received, they'd still be worthless serfs (for raping) right down to the nucleus in every cell in their bodies. You know, I'm starting to think you're not really British at all.
Emma Watson flips
Troons are not cool anymore
"Fuck off" says Rowling
I like your "fuck off" kireji.
 
Back
Top Bottom