it starts off as a children's book and grows up to be a competent adult story. Rowling's takedown of Sturgeon by comparing her to twilight was hilarious.
well, they should, and she did
no, it's the respond eshe gives when her side finally wins and normal people stop treating biology like it's fairy dust
I love this line of logic from midwits, as if the two things were comparable at all. No, trannies killing xemselves is not as tragic as Charlie Kirk getting shot. No, calling troons men doesn't approach the level of genocide. The actors are insane because the supported something that goes against nature, while believing themselves to be in the right.
Both Harry and Ron’s characters were given a pretty raw deal in the movies. Harry existed as some wonder kid with little idea on how the wizarding world worked, while Ron was treated like an idiot that couldn’t control his emotions. Meanwhile, Hermione was made to be gifted at everything except Defense against the Dark Arts, and conveniently figured out most of the mysteries for Harry and Ron to act upon. Hermione was made into a Mary Sue type character before Mary Sue types really took off in the 2010s.
Idk how common it is, but a few months ago I found a schoolteacher with RDS who writes gay HP fanfic about the teenage male characters crossdressing. FBI should check her hard drive and her messaging history with students.
Precisely. At any time JK Rowling could have back-pedaled on the trans issue. She's proven she has guts and she's not afraid to speak her mind in the face of public pressure. I don't agree with her on everything, but I'll generally listen to what she has to say and consider her beliefs even if I don't agree with them.
Watson fancies herself an activist. She fronted #HeForShe at the UN.
I watched Nuns on the Run this weekend. Robbie was great. Odd seeing him so young. It was on cytube
thank you. good shit.
You sound like a bitter tranny queer. Are you a tranny queer?
Whenever I perused some of the more infamous examples for my own morbid entertainment back in the day I was always struck by the hard undercurrent of entitlement the authors oozed as to how unfair and immoral it was for Rowling not to write the stories in line with their masturbatory fantasies where the (underage) character they identify as fucks whatever (underage) characters the authors have the hots for, which now that I think about it fits almost perfectly to the sexual entitlement troons have with regards to the fictional women they identify as being able to fuck whatever women and girls they have the hots for, and whining about how unfair and immoral it is for them to say no
this is precisely the stance to take on someone that you see stand up for their values, regardless of how fashionable and accepted they are.
Does he say that? I seem to recall him going a more "I'm Harry Potter, bitch" route that I always thought was funny. Is he not doing that anymore? If not, that's pretty lame of him.
The entire point of Harry living in Surrey is that he hates it there and feels out of place. Making Harry black makes no sense not because of where his aunt and uncle live, but because one of his parents is a pureblood British wizard and the other one is a pale redhead with a blonde sister.
It was atrocious. Stilted acting, over busy designs, and a complete failure to grasp the characters and their romance. I wanted Gaston to win.
Ford had been black before. One of the points of all the different versions was they all intentionally contradicted each other. The books contradict the original story from the radio drama, different editions of the books contradict each other, the TV show contradicted the books and radio series, the Infocom text adventure contradicted everything else, and so did the movie.
Amazing that the man who played the backstabbing spoiled brat, actually is one of the most loyal and best people.
Slytherin was alwayd the best house.
