Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Sinner's Sandwich said:
Michelle doesn't understand that she can't have it both ways. She can't suck tranny dick and do HP stuff. She is trying but the trans cult won't ever forgive her.
Click to expand...
No but I’m glad she tried. The more normies that try to take a completely reasonable, measured response and get BTFOed by crazy trannies, the better. The only way out is through.
 
A splendidly insane rant from Bluesky:

1754610810518.webp 1754610838401.webp

All that for a few tweets at the expanse of the worst of the worst: Himdia Willoughby, Sophie Molly, Roxanne Tickle etc...
 
Candidate No 7 said:
Goblin reparations
Click to expand...
Wait wait, they think the goblins are supposed to be Jews, would that mean carving out some country just for the goblins’ homeland? Because I don’t think that would gel with the average Bluesky user’s idea of a happy ending these days

(Also again, no you were not thinking all that in 2007 ye revisionist tryhard)
 
Candidate No 7 said:
A splendidly insane rant from Bluesky:
Click to expand...
She literally tweets a couple times a day and then the entire pedosphere completely loses their shit the next 24 hours. These morons literally think something she maybe thinks about for 20 minutes a day is a total obsession, while themselves having a complete heart attack any time she says a single word.
 
Shotgun Badger said:
View attachment 7753788
Oh boy, we got the chair thing again.
Click to expand...
TRAs: "Caterpillars become butterflies and clownfish change their sex, therefore human men can become human women."

Also TRAs: "LOL did you just say being born with egg-producing equipment makes you a woman???? Are you saying chickens are women??!? Hahaha silly TERFs."

Anyway chickens are not born, they hatch, but go off I guess.
 
Hunter Hearst Helmsley said:
Hahahahaha, they have no idea what kind of martyr she would become.
Click to expand...
On top of that, Luigi Mangione is quite the reactionary by today's metrics, in contrast to the antifascist folk hero keyboard warriors on Bluesky make him out to be. She's far from the black-boots-wearing TTD fash they portray her as (her being, in reality, a slightly disgruntled, milquetoast neoliberal), but Rowling is not the kind of person he would have in his crosshairs.

mangione_thought.webp


Now, recall the kind gentleman from earlier arranging the TERF Queen's funeral for her, in reply to one Gretchen Felker-Martin:

Trianon said:
I checked his account and he literally just came back. Basically some big-name actors were recently announced for a new audiobook version of Harry Potter, which threw JKR's haters into a tizzy.

View attachment 7751389

Don't see the original post that got him banned. Usually you have to agree to remove it to be taken off these moderation lists.
Click to expand...

The quotes and replies are just about what you'd expect.

rowling_dump.webp


Original | Archive

rowling_court.webp





Original | Archive

rowling_airplane.webp


Original | Archive

rowling_bluesky_reason.webp


Original | Archive

rowling_self_defence.webp


Original | Archive

And of course, there is this fine specimen to chime in.

Original | Archive
 
ElevenYearBeggacy said:
Yes she/her nigger, hens lay eggs. Roosters do not.
Click to expand...
Animals with Y chromosomes have motile spermatazoa. When these are humans, they're called MEN. Because that is what they ARE. Animals with two X chromosomes have stationary gametes. These are called female. When they are human, they are called WOMEN.

There are only two types of human. WOMEN and MEN.

Troons can have their fantasies but they need to quit making death and rape threats to people who disagree with their psychotic delusions.
 
Shotgun Badger said:
View attachment 7753788
Oh boy, we got the chair thing again.
Click to expand...
I like how le ebic contrarian snark has become so commonplace and incestuous on the internet that people are unironically reverting back to literal Diogenes "arguments".

Ignoring that having egg-producing equipment also differentiates hens from roosters, Rowling using the term "YOU" when stating her claim should point to the fact that she's not talking about fucking animals.

In what possible context would the preface of "If you have x y z" be used when referring to anything other than people? Are there chickens reading twitter?

It's like if Rowling said "If you weigh 30 stone, you're a very unhealthy person" and some retard replied to her with an image of a small car and said "behold, a very unhealthy person!" Like wow dude you sure showed her.
 
AnOminous said:
Animals with Y chromosomes have motile spermatazoa.
Click to expand...
This is not true across the animal kingdom and should not be put forward as an argument. Chickens, for example, have heterozygous females (ZW) and homozygous males (ZZ). The mobile spermatozoa is the defining feature of males in the broadest sense, not the chromosomes.
 
gaysexenjoyer said:
I like how le ebic contrarian snark has become so commonplace and incestuous on the internet that people are unironically reverting back to literal Diogenes "arguments".

Ignoring that having egg-producing equipment also differentiates hens from roosters, Rowling using the term "YOU" when stating her claim should point to the fact that she's not talking about fucking animals.

In what possible context would the preface of "If you have x y z" be used when referring to anything other than people? Are there chickens reading twitter?

It's like if Rowling said "If you weigh 30 stone, you're a very unhealthy person" and some retard replied to her with an image of a small car and said "behold, a very unhealthy person!" Like wow dude you sure showed her.
Click to expand...
Its such incredibly tedious contrarianism that makes everybody engaging in it look like Dwight from the office, but of course we have to pretend that its an amazing own on that dumb broad Rowling, despite the fact that it doesn't even argue against the more important point that sex is a real thing that exists and can be defined (are we meant to think that a picture of a rooster would make sense there?) and that it wouldn't work if Rowling had just said "a person" at the start of her tweet rather than making the silly assumption that she was engaging with a human being rather than poultry that's learned to type and use twitter.
Pickman's Modeling Agency said:
This is not true across the animal kingdom and should not be put forward as an argument. Chickens, for example, have heterozygous females (ZW) and homozygous males (ZZ). The mobile spermatozoa is the defining feature of males in the broadest sense, not the chromosomes.
Click to expand...
Yeah, its annoying to have to do this, but its kind of required lately to be very clear about the arguments on a scientific level since troons will say any ridiculous shit obviously counter to observable reality but hyper fixate on any slip up if their opponent makes a mistake in saying, for example, that Chromosomes are 100% determinative of sex. It is one of those subjects where its a bit delicate when you really get into the nitty gritty about what actually determines sex and Chromosomes can sometimes not quite line up, its better to talk about the actual genitals and their function and formation.

Of course, when you do get down to that level of detail, the next thing they'll throw at you is suggesting that you are an obsessed weirdo for knowing so much about the topic or accusing you of shifting definitions in a never-ending Sisyphean quest to cover for the shortcomings of a previous but flawed definition, with the inevitable implication there is no definition (this is why they love the Diogenes stuff), so you can't really win half the time.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom