Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Why is this being remade again?
It can't be for money. I suspect Rowling wants to poke Daniel Radcliffe and the anorexic bint in the eye by showing that they aren't nearly as integral to potter as they think. Either that, or she wants a screen version that includes some of the things that had to be cut for the films.
 
It can't be for money. I suspect Rowling wants to poke Daniel Radcliffe and the anorexic bint in the eye by showing that they aren't nearly as integral to potter as they think. Either that, or she wants a screen version that includes some of the things that had to be cut for the films.

That's pretty much the only aspect that even even potentially interested me. I hate how ADD everyone is and expected to be, which causes things like that to be cut up and drained of so much content. The first two movies actually tried at least.

But as i said, i never held out much hope and don't even really want these, with new actors etc, even in the best of cases.. In the current year though... ugh
 
Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 13-04-27 (20) Calling All Astronauts on X @JohnBoyneBooks @jk_rowling...png
😂

TRAs mad
Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 13-19-03 The Cincinnati Kid on X @jk_rowling @AdamBrimson We are burn...png a
Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 13-19-13 Doggydoggywhatnow on X @jk_rowling That’s why I pirated them...png a
Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 13-19-39 (1) Calling All Astronauts on X @JohnBoyneBooks @jk_rowling ...png a
 
Umbridge and Skeeter are depicted as:

1) Ugly
2) Unpleasant
3) Manipulative
4) Lying

Journalist: They must be trans caricatures 😀
 
wtf is a reading age and how exactly is it a flex
The guy is saying that because he’s such a good parent his daughter is so good at reading that she’s much better at it than other children of her age group usually are, and therefore capable of reading more advanced children’s reading material, but he’s not going to let her read Harry Potter. Which he hopes will make JK Rowling cope and seethe. It’s basically an “I have a child I can indoctrinate into my worldview and there’s nothing you can do about it, so there!” type thing.
 
but he’s not going to let her read Harry Potter.
*laughs until I turn blue*

Sure, buddy. You just believe you can somehow keep your daughter from reading the books all her friends are reading. Your weird hatred of a children's author is absolutely going to make your daughter cut herself off from a pillar of modern pop culture. Suuuuuuure.
 
The “Rita Skeeter is a parody of a trans woman” is yet another social-media-fueled bad attempt at a queer reading, like the goblins being Jews or that Jo is racist because she has characters named Kingsley Shacklebolt, Cho Chang, and Seamus Finnegan. There is no evidence at all to make any of these assertions, but these people are so busy huffing their own farts that they don’t care. Unfortunately, this garbage has spread so far and wide that I’m not sure if it’s even worth it to try to correct the record, but the good part is that the vast, vast majority of normie Harry Potter fans (which is like, everyone) do not give a shit and have the same response as all of us do.
Rita Skeeter is an archetype of a very specific kind of spiteful gossipy female British journalist, just like Private Eye's stock character Glenda Slagg. JK Rowling wrote Goblet of Fire at a time when she hadn't been famous for very long, and I think a lot of the Rita Skeeter subplot is based on her experiences of misleading or misquoted interviews.
 
You wouldn't want to roast marshmallows over a "pirated" book, the plastic from the Kindle would leave a funny taste.

Then he calls her "dumb".
Maybe he pirated it then printed it out?
🤔
 
Back
Top Bottom