Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Times article on this, without the paywall


"Any would-be protesters are encouraged to come and see the play for themselves. “I imagine if they can sit through that first scene, they’re gonna be much less likely to want to heckle,” Kaplan said. It involves Radcliffe, Watson and Grint standing behind Rowling, wearing wolf masks while they read out tweets which threaten and show love to Rowling in equally rabid measure."

Sounds great!!1!1!
 
It involves Radcliffe, Watson and Grint standing behind Rowling, wearing wolf masks while they read out tweets which threaten and show love to Rowling in equally rabid measure."
Sounds utterly cringy and deranged.
 
Times article on this, without the paywall

Thanks, the one I saw was a different one. One mo.


When the casting call went out for the Edinburgh Fringe’s edgiest show of the year, 16 women vied for the chance to play the lead.
Despite directors being “dead set” against casting a non-Brit, Laura Kay Bailey, a Texan, was selected to portray JK Rowling in Terf, which will dramatise the rift between the author and the stars of Harry Potter when it hits the stage next month.
The title is an acronym of “trans-exclusionary radical feminist” and is used to refer to people who do not believe transgender identities are legitimate and oppose including trans women in the feminist movement.

Its writer Joshua Kaplan, a Hollywood screenwriter, says his play is not a “hit piece” on Rowling. Instead, he says, it offers a satirical exaggeration of the online trans debate of which Rowling has been a central figure.

At 43, Bailey is 15 years younger than Rowling but apparently does a “pitch perfect” imitation of her Gloucestershire voice, which has a “very slight, almost undetectable lisp”.
She has studied the author’s inflections, quirks, movements, poses and facial expressions, recognising that Rowling’s gesticulations have become bolder in recent years compared with videos of earlier interviews.
Rowling, who lives in Edinburgh, is well known for preferring to speak to her 14 million Twitter/X followers directly, often making headlines with her pronouncements on sex and gender with the author claiming the trans rights movement is seeking to “erode ‘woman’ as a political and biological class”.
This has stoked a rift with Harry Potter actors including Daniel Radcliffe, who responded to Rowling’s tweets by issuing a personal statement defending transgender people. The fall-out between this Harry Potter family is the basis of the play.


But what is Bailey’s stance on the trans debate and the woman she is portraying?
“I am fully aware I’m playing a character who’s just an absolute villain for so many people,” said the mother of two, who has lived in London for a decade. “But what I try to do as an actor, and what you are taught to do as a professional, is try to understand who is the human underneath that.”
Deciding whether she should play Rowling gave her pause.
“I had to just sort of think it over for 12 hours. But I think ultimately this is what theatre is about.” She recites one of her favourite quotes: “Theatre is where we work out our ever-changing definition of humanity”.
Bailey, who does not use Twitter, admits to having been “terribly uninformed, woefully uninformed” about the issue before taking the role.
Reading Rowling’s tweets therefore formed part of her “character research”, in which she also watched interviews with her and listened to the podcast The Witch Trials of JK Rowling.
The Harry Potter author has endured death threats and doxxing for some of her more contentious social media posts.
In the most striking example she posted an April Fools thread in which she misgendered prominent trans women, including Mridul Wadhwa, the head of a Scottish rape crisis centre, Munroe Bergdorf, a model and writer, and the broadcaster India Willoughby alongside convicted sex offenders.
Bailey recognises the need for debate about single-sex bathrooms and gender recognition certificates, but can’t understand some of Rowling’s online behaviour.
“Trans people deserve trans rights and human rights,” she said. “That’s just a given. And I don’t understand why she would attack and say some of the things she said on Twitter.”
This play asks the audience to reflect on what Bailey calls “viciousness” on “both sides”.
In one scene Rowling accuses Radcliffe of “treating propaganda as if it were gospel, opinion as if it were fact, and god forbid someone should even hint that maybe up is not down, you bravely silence them with 280 character smears”.
This is Bailey’s second time working at the Fringe, but she’s “never been a part of anything so contentious”.
“It’s a bit scary, or daunting, but it feels important. It feels like the project has depth. It’s exciting to be a part of something that has the potential to really move the needle on a topic.”
Bailey spent years working in New York theatre, including in an off-Broadway Tennessee Williams play where NY Magazine described her performance as “electrifying”. Coming back after a long career break during which she had two children thrust her into a new, older casting category.
She is pleased to be playing a character with “edge”. It is an opportunity to break away from the “pretty one-dimensional” roles available to her now, which are usually mum, corporate CEO or boss, and, with strange frequency, newscasters.
Last year she finished filming for Cancelled, in which a “disgraced actress and her publicity team retreat to her penthouse apartment after images of her affair leak online”.
What matters to her is playing a believable Rowling, who she hopes would consider buying a ticket to the show.
“I think she should come and watch it,” said Bailey. “I think she should. I would if somebody was playing me on stage. I don’t think I could stay away.”
 
Times article on this, without the paywall


"Any would-be protesters are encouraged to come and see the play for themselves. “I imagine if they can sit through that first scene, they’re gonna be much less likely to want to heckle,” Kaplan said. It involves Radcliffe, Watson and Grint standing behind Rowling, wearing wolf masks while they read out tweets which threaten and show love to Rowling in equally rabid measure."

Sounds great!!1!1!
As someone who spent a lot of time as an actor in theatre, you haven't seen anything yet. It's entirely a hobby for deranged trust fund nepo babies who can afford to not make money so long as they can virtue signal. It's rife with lolcows. I had to sadly realize that even though I love performing and theatre in particular, nearly everyone in that industry doesn't actually. I'm not alone in this, Performing Arts has one of the highest unemployment rates, rivalling the financial sector. Most like myself just give up and leave because of how deranged it all is. Plays are funded based how they soothe the egos of an already vanishingly small group of people that gets smaller all the time. And these people scratch their heads wondering why theatre is dead. Which kills me as someone who loves theatre and watching plays over going to a cinema to watch Capeshit and endless Fast & the Furious sequels.
 
Laura Kay Bailey is a nothing actor. Even her demo reel is shit acting.

link to her (skimpy) imdb page

the imdb page includes her demo reel, in case you want to point and laugh.

EDIT: And sorry to be _that person_ but is Laura Kay Bailey a real woman, or a true and honest "woman"? That jaw, and the lack of hips.

No chance that's a tranny. Just a not very attractive woman.
 
Sophie Molly back for some more humiliation.

1720544055794.png
 
trans rights = being a published author or a politician?

maybe just be better at your job or stop harassing women online, freaks
Tilly's not even a published author. She worked at a bookstore and told a gender critical author that if she saw her books at the store she would throw them away... so her bosses fired her.
View attachment 6169830

Thanks, the one I saw was a different one. One mo.

https://archive.ph/tkXhB
Bailey recognises the need for debate about single-sex bathrooms and gender recognition certificates, but can’t understand some of Rowling’s online behaviour.
“Trans people deserve trans rights and human rights,” she said. “That’s just a given. And I don’t understand why she would attack and say some of the things she said on Twitter.”
You can't understand why your character would say the things that she says? That's a sign that you're going to do a great job playing her.
 
Last edited:
Calling her Bob Rowling is the most autism-brained thing this side of Chris-Chan. It's not even a funny insult, because only trannies get offended over that shit, it just makes this guy look retarded. May as well call her a butthead.
 
“Legally exclude trans people from public life” Good grief, they’re SO unbelievably dramatic. What laws are actually being made to do this? That would mean outright banning trans identified people from public places/events. That’s not fucking happening.
 
Calling her Bob Rowling is the most autism-brained thing this side of Chris-Chan. It's not even a funny insult, because only trannies get offended over that shit, it just makes this guy look retarded. May as well call her a butthead.
I mean, these are the same cutting-edge geniuses who thought changing "TERF" to "FART" made them look very cool and hip and not at all like a bunch of thirteen year old boys who still think that fart and poo jokes are the pinnacle of comedy.

What laws are actually being made to do this? That would mean outright banning trans identified people from public places/events. That’s not fucking happening.
No, it's not, but that won't stop them from claiming it is! Just like how they claim keeping men in the men's bathrooms is "making it so transwomen can't use public bathrooms" and kicking men out of women's domestic violence and rape shelters is "keeping transwomen from accessing shelter services". It's a manipulative way of reframing the argument as "my way or the highway" - either they get absolutely everything they want, full stop, no compromise, or they'll oh em gee kill themselves, no in between. Sure, the logical response to "what will poor ickle transwomen do if they can't use the women's bathrooms and rub their semen on the doorknobs :(" is "use the fucking men's room because you're men," but they can't have that being an option because it's far too sensible and offends their narcissism.

(Wish I was kidding but there have been at least two, possibly more trans-identified males caught bragging on Twitter about jacking off in the women's bathroom and rubbing their semen on the door handles to force women to come into contact with it unknowingly. God knows what else men have done in the ladies' that they've gotten away with because surely some of them are smart enough not to brag on social media about their crimes.)
 
Saw this shared on the Amanda Palmer thread on lolcow.farm
she worse.png
>Obviously she's worse
According to TRA's: Leveraging one's celebrity status and one's position as an employer to manipulate then bugger a young woman to the point that she bleeds is not as bad as a few mean tweets and voicing a hand full of perfectly reasonable safety concerns. Why would they even feel the need bring up JK Rowling when they wrote this?
 
Calling her Bob Rowling is the most autism-brained thing this side of Chris-Chan. It's not even a funny insult, because only trannies get offended over that shit, it just makes this guy look retarded. May as well call her a butthead.
It reminds me of the South Park episode where Cartman poses as a psychic and antagonises established psychics and they have a psychic battle which consists of gesticulating and making special effect noises with their throats at each other.
 
Back
Top Bottom