- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
I will say:Just look at Robert Pattinson. He was typecast just as hard as the pretty boy from Twilight and could have coasted on it like they did, but instead he actually got some acting chops and put the effort in to break out of his mold and do roles from Batman to a grizzled old lighthouse keeper.
I did not particularly enjoy The Batman. For a batman film it was a slow, plodding self-important mess that was like 15 years too late to capture the emos who jack it to The Crow and was like 45 minutes too long.
But Pattinson, to my shock, was not one of the reasons I did not like the film. I don't think I'd go so far as to call him a great or anything, but he did a solid job (even if i thought the character was kinda shit, his performance was good)
vs. Radcliff going to fuck a horse.
What "Human Rights", tranny? Name one human right you will be denied by not having everyone suck your inverted dick.
its not rights. Its privileges.
The fact Watson never talked about it in the era of MeToo makes me pretty sure Weinstein never fucked her.As much as a shit as Weinstein was. I never heard of him fucking kids. Surely they would have outed that by now.
What he did do was run a casting couch for eager young starlets willing to do anything to be a star. Since she was cast as a child, I just don't see a reason for her sleep with Weinstein to get a part she already had. Weinstein wasn't stupid enough to kill his cash cow. It might have been an option once all of the Harry Potter movies were over and she needed a new part. But she was already famous. She could have had many staring roles thrown at her if she were capable.
Also lol at the people calling a 19 year old a child.