You can get the candies by blowing, popping and jump on bubbles respectively, I usually manage to get all 3 by the end of stage 6-7, it makes later levels much better.No chance on the arcade version. I just tried, died for the first time on 9, game overed on 14.
Because people won't buy them otherwise.
SPONGEBOB HAS BETTER ERA MANAGEMENT, PRE-MOVIE, POST MOVIE.
I'll remind you, this is a 15+ year old budget DS game that was sold at the same price, and people still showed up to buy it
Why are you sperging about classic games?
Did they? I thought this release didn't do so well.
I'm really sorry but I can't take anything you say seriously with this avatar.
The internet is Serious Business, so, unlike you, I wear my Serious Business suit to post.
anyone with a puar in the name is basically screaming "I HAVE BROWN THOUGHTS IGNORE ME"
it's at most like 5 guys doing bare minimum quality of life shit, and it's a visual Novel with puzzles.
Overall I agree with you, however..
Eh, it depends. I can think of at least a few games that, while fun, are flawed enough that they did need a remake to iron out their quirks. Like the Triforce quest from Wind Waker, or Dragon Quest 2’s endgame, or Pokemon RBY’s balancing and glitches. Hell, even the ability to save in Mario 1-3 makes the games infinitely better (though it really does nothing to help Lost Levels).
Your criteria for determining whether something is retro or not is based on the cutoff point of what other people are willing to buy? Why would you define a technical term on the arbitrary tastes of people who don't even like the medium to begin with?
What are you even talking about? Why should anyone consider retro to be a technical term? How is retro a medium? Obviously, when you're talking about a customary term like retro, the criteria needs to determined by the reason of the thing, which is entirely that normies are not interested in it because of the age. How is this so difficult for you to understand?
Isn't this exactly what you're trying to do by trumpeting some autistically specific standard of "People won't buy it unless its remade" that only exists in your head?
Oh god, you’re gonna make me create a “Retro Is A Quale” t-shirt, aren’t you?
I understand that this is just a generic insult, but you really ought to think before you speak. My criterion is neither autistic nor very specific. It's a vague criterion that is used by billion dollar corporations when considering whether their old games are old enough to need a makeover. Of course, PS4 games will be retro soon, and this could not happen unless people began to think that they are retro, contrary to people who want to gatekeep the idea of retro to some specific era of videogames. Also, like I said before, retro does not refer to "old things that people care about," it's the opposite: "old things that people don't care about because fashion moves ever onward." It used to be the case that everyone wanted to wear apple bottom jeans, but nobody wants to wear them anymore, so if you do, "that's so retro."
All this post is doing is confirming my initial assessment to be accurate.
Would you like to explain to the class?
Sure, autistic people show rigidity in their thinking and tend to try to apply rules to everything. They often don't understand when something is more based on feelings or "vibes" as the kids say these days, and will try to use rules to explain things that don't really have any.
Would you like to explain to me how you derived any of that from what I said? It would be epic.
