🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Shows like Made in Abyss are a masterpiece (and I do love it for that), but with how many pointless sexual scenes there are in it, it's only a matter of time before the creator get arrested. That man is definitely into children. But i don't think the show shouldn't exist just because those scenes exist. We'd be out of frankly one of the best anime I've ever seen with some amazing worldbuilding and miyazaki levels of art.
Idk what to tell you.
Sorry nuanced thinking is so hard for you. It's a simple concept of people who are lolicons were already pedophiles, and loli anime didn't make them pedophiles.
Must be crazy to see liquid batter go into the oven and a whole solid-ass cake come out.
Edit: I want to add my own respect here, because as sarcastic as I was here, I get it. Anime is weird. And I get it's not for everyone, and the vast majority of people I encounter who like anime are maladaptive retards. But part of what I've always loved about it is how much some shows push the envelope for a joke and the ways you can do this in anime that you just couldn't do IRL. So respectively, you are smooth brained.
I don't think I'll make you agree with me, but it doesn't mean we can't show each other a base level of respect. We aren't fuckin' redditors.
I can agree in some capacity. There are a LOT of people who are just maladjusted adults that gravitate to anime. Are these people pedophiles? I don't think lolicon leads to pedophilia necessarily.
does this logic work anywhere else? if a guy jacks off to drawings of two guys having sex, is sexually attracted to drawings of two guys having sex, and purposefully seeks out drawings of two guys having sex to jack off to, is he simply "not gay" because "lol it's just a drawing bro"?
Shows like Made in Abyss are a masterpiece (and I do love it for that), but with how many pointless sexual scenes there are in it, it's only a matter of time before the creator get arrested. That man is definitely into children. But i don't think the show shouldn't exist just because those scenes exist. We'd be out of frankly one of the best anime I've ever seen with some amazing worldbuilding and miyazaki levels of art.
does this logic work anywhere else? if a guy jacks off to drawings of two guys having sex, is sexually attracted to drawings of two guys having sex, and purposefully seeks out drawings of two guys having sex to jack off to, is he simply "not gay" because "lol it's just a drawing bro"?
I mean, I'd certainly question him for being gay...
but that assumes he's jacking off to it.
What if he is watching two guys kissing? Is he turned on? Is it apart of a broader story?
I mean, I'd certainly question him for being gay...
but that assumes he's jacking off to it.
What if he is watching two guys kissing? Is he turned on? Is it apart of a broader story?
No you made at least a half decent statement which helped me clarify my point.
The other guy though is just arguing like a redditor.
You see, a retard is not one who misunderstands. A retard is one who does not seek to understand.
No you made at least a half decent statement which helped me clarify my point.
The other guy though is just arguing like a redditor.
You see, a retard is not one who misunderstands. A retard is one who does not seek to understand.
Shows like Made in Abyss are a masterpiece (and I do love it for that), but with how many pointless sexual scenes there are in it, it's only a matter of time before the creator get arrested. That man is definitely into children. But i don't think the show shouldn't exist just because those scenes exist.
MIA is pedobait, dyed in the wool pedobait, from character designs, to the lore, to even the behavior of the primary antagonists. The main characters are children who constantly get naked, the series relishes in torturing and stripping children, the creator is basically an open pedo. This isn't a case of "I really like this but it has that scene, the entire show is about "that scenes". Separating the art from the artist only works if the art isn't infested with the artists's perversions.
MIA is pedobait, dyed in the wool pedobait, from character designs, to the lore, to even the behavior of the primary antagonists. The main characters are children who constantly get naked, the series relishes in torturing and stripping children, the creator is basically an open pedo. This isn't a case of "I really like this but it has that scene, the entire show is about "that scenes". Separating the art from the artist only works if the art isn't infested with the artists's perversions.
I'm sure Reddit will be completely normal about this story. Hahaha. Ha.
The thing about comments like this is that you know they wouldn't actually want this in practice. No one wants to watch a man batter a woman in a boxing ring. If you read the actual article it seems there's something fishy going on here. It's actually not clear at all if the kid in this story was born male or female. The parents - who ran to the media with the story first - want us to think it's the former, but the school district's response suggests it's actually the latter:
In this particular case, the student has been enrolled in QCUSD since elementary school and has been registered as a biological female throughout their time in our district. The day before basketball tryouts, the parent submitted a new birth certificate and a doctor’s note indicating a gender change. Our schools rely on a student’s original birth certificate at birth to determine athletic eligibility.
Why does the district describe the new documentation as indicating a “gender change” when the parents describe it as correcting a clerical error? Because that's not a minor discrepancy.
I'm not saying this is a clear-and-shut case of activist parents deceptively framing the situation in a way that makes the relevant law look ridiculous, but if that is what they were doing, this is how they would act. Especially when "these anti-trans laws will affect the cis kids!" was already well-established troonlore.
Redditors mock man killed by a tiger and sperg about Donald Trump.
If someone jumps into a tiger enclosure they're probably mentally ill, maybe autistic or disabled. But I guess mocking mentally unwell people is okay if they get mauled to death by tigers. https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCrin...ently_a_man_jumped_into_a_tiger_enclosure_in/
Comment section gets locked for people being to based, though i doubt most of these people are full hard chuds that will name the actual issue at hand.
It does amaze me that the left will pride themselves on empathy and kindness but immediately make fun of someone who's very clearly either not right in the head or high on coke. I saw a thread the other day about the father from FGTeeV having a schizo episode (most likely meth induced) and most of the comments were either making some type of witty remark or saying he was a trump supporter (i highly doubt FGTeeV is a avid MAGA voter). They want to whine about edginess but want to be edgy they can't make up their minds.
It does amaze me that the left will pride themselves on empathy and kindness but immediately make fun of someone who's very clearly either not right in the head or high on coke. I saw a thread the other day about the father from FGTeeV having a schizo episode (most likely meth induced) and most of the comments were either making some type of witty remark or saying he was a trump supporter (i highly doubt FGTeeV is a avid MAGA voter). They want to whine about edginess but want to be edgy they can't make up their minds.
Redditors love any opportunity to feel better about themselves. Darwin award, take all the warning labels off of things and let nature take its course, fafo. It's very important to their self esteem that they feel smarter than "the masses"
love r/meth
(this guy's first reddit post is a picture of him shooting up meth in his arm)
(stupid addicted bitch)
(humanising trash)
(buddy you look like a crackhead)
(guy doing hot meth mask hits (???))
Quite weird how Reddit was basically 4chan back in the day now it’s the most ‘be politically correct and if u have a slightly different opinion we will downvote you to hell’ social media
