Red Letter Media

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Favorite recurring character? (Select 4)

  • Jack / AIDSMobdy

    Votes: 257 24.0%
  • Josh / the Wizard

    Votes: 77 7.2%
  • Colin (Canadian #1)

    Votes: 460 42.9%
  • Jim (Canadian #2)

    Votes: 230 21.4%
  • Tim

    Votes: 386 36.0%
  • Len Kabasinski

    Votes: 208 19.4%
  • Freddie Williams

    Votes: 274 25.5%
  • Patton Oswalt

    Votes: 27 2.5%
  • Macaulay Culkin

    Votes: 541 50.4%
  • Max Landis

    Votes: 64 6.0%

  • Total voters
    1,073
His number one episode of TNG is "Who Watches the Watchers" which he describes as "Star Trek puts no value in the concept of faith. Star Trek is all about reason and rationality." Which, first of, there's very literal episodes of both TOS and TNG where the rational and reasonable characters like Spock and Data respectively are shown that their methods aren't always the correct answer so I have no idea where the fuck he gets that. Like the whole point of a having an entire crew is because you need to have various points of views and skillsets to be able to traverse the fucking universe. Second, I'm gonna call this midwittery cause for whatever reason Rich has a huge thing against religion, more than likely family related, so he really values reason, science and all that shit... in a TV show. Like if you applied this in real life I could see the benefits but it seems like he solely applies to TV show writing. Bizarre.

Sci-fi publisher Tor published a rewatch of TNG by Trek author Keith Candido some years ago (I think they've done one for all of the major series to date). "Who Watches the Watchers" clocked in as one of the worst episodes of the series for generally making no sense and being terribly written.

“She has never seen a bow!” I hated this episode when it first aired, and I actually hate it more now. I’ve often seen it cited as a favorite of the third season and of the show in general, and to this day I will never understand why.

We start on the wrong foot when Troi and Picard carry on about how rational the Mintakans are, which only makes sense because their evolution has paralleled Vulcans. Except, as established way back in “Balance of Terror,” and reemphasized any number of places, most notably “All Our Yesterdays,” Vulcans used to be savage and brutal, and only within the last few thousand years adopted logic and suppressing of emotions—not because they’re an orderly, rational people, but because they most assuredly weren’t.

The episode continues in an unsubtle and unconvincing manner, with the characters falling into the old first-season habit of describing themselves like they’re reading from a textbook about their culture rather than talking about their own lives. Worse, is the constant use by the Mintakans of the word “reasonable,” employed as a cheap substitute for “logical” to show that they’re just like Vulcans but not quite.

This episode firmly makes clear that TNG‘s interpretation of the Prime Directive will be a little too absolute and all-encompassing, to the point of absurdity. Picard asks Crusher why she didn’t let Liko die, dismissing her point that it was their fault he was injured, an appalling and despicable lack of compassion on the part of our theoretical hero. Several times, Barron points out that the cultural contamination already happened, so Picard’s obsessive insistence on avoiding any appearance by Federation technology from that point forward borders on the ridiculous (especially given that it endangers the lives of both Palmer, who needs medical attention that’s delayed by this insistence, and Troi, who is held prisoner).

Both the rush to superstition and the reversal of it happen so quickly that the gears are stripped from going into reverse so fast. Barron’s claim that the Mintakans will inevitably descend into holy wars and inquisitions because one guy in one village thinks he saw God is incredibly specious, especially coming from someone who’s supposed to be an anthropologist, and therefore should know better than to speak in absolutes. Admittedly, plenty of religions have been born of less, but a lot more became short-lived cults that burned out in fairly short order.

The one place where the episode shines is when Picard brings Nuria to the Enterprise. Scott beautifully plays her wonder and amazement, and Sir Patrick Stewart does magnificently in explaining Clarke’s Third Law to her.

Finally, how seriously can you take an episode where one of the characters (Liko’s daughter) has a name that sounds like that of the girl on Magilla Gorilla?

Warp factor rating: 3 (out of 10)
 
Then he talks about the episode "First Contact" and how he wanted the fictional politician to be real cause he wouldn't be like those other politicians at the time (ie Trump and Biden arguing) pointing to how the politician and Picard have a reasonable conversation where they let each other talk and exchange ideas. In a shocking case of autism, he thinks this is the equivalent of a debate. Again, just rampant midwittery. He really thinks he's so smart for thinking this.
TBF, he is reacting to the sober, statesmen-like way they are talking, which is missing in American politics for a very long time. Content-wise, the president said he can't trust the language of diplomacy and the episode ends on maintaining the status quo.
 
Deep Space 9 Season 1 Part 2

Best friends Rick and Morn talk about the remaining episodes of season 1 of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. As of this writing, the new show Star Trek: Starfleet Academy has come out and it's release is totally unrelated to this release. The timing is pure coincidence I assure you. Mark and Gork love Star Trek and probably will continue to talk about. However, after seeing Starfleet Academy (or SA as Kurtzman calls it) it is so bad and misguided it's almost a moot point. Star Trek as it once was... is lost. I think it's too far gone. It is possible to make a new series (with new producers) and set it in the 24th century in an isolated setting and have smaller, well written stories that don't involve revenge, a super-weapon, or people that sound like total idiots and are annoying, but knowing that the future of Starfleet will eventually look like it does is a specter that cannot be ignored. What has happened? HOW did this happen? Who has dirt on who? Is NuTrek a scam? A tax write-off? Is 80% of the budget going to the 24 credited producers? I mean, how does a show with so few viewers even become profitable for a streaming service. Or even an asset and not a liability? Morg smells something fishy going on... maybe? At least according to his opinion. Rork and Glorg in no way suggest any illegal activity, but just perhaps activity that might not be moral at the very least. I mean, seriously? It's become a joke at this point. Anyway, no one can ever take my DS9 DVDs away from me. You'll have to pry them from my cold, dead hand. Anyway, enjoy this deep dive into old Trek. Rich and Mike promise more. MUCH MORE!!! WE WILL NOT STOP. WE WILL CONTINUE!!!
 
LOL, kek, lel even:
image_2026-01-21_121147992.png
My favorite part is 2¶ of cope at the end:
image_2026-01-21_121323132.png
 
Deep Space 9 Season 1 Part 2
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SXYFrc1-ES8
Best friends Rick and Morn talk about the remaining episodes of season 1 of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. As of this writing, the new show Star Trek: Starfleet Academy has come out and it's release is totally unrelated to this release. The timing is pure coincidence I assure you. Mark and Gork love Star Trek and probably will continue to talk about. However, after seeing Starfleet Academy (or SA as Kurtzman calls it) it is so bad and misguided it's almost a moot point. Star Trek as it once was... is lost. I think it's too far gone. It is possible to make a new series (with new producers) and set it in the 24th century in an isolated setting and have smaller, well written stories that don't involve revenge, a super-weapon, or people that sound like total idiots and are annoying, but knowing that the future of Starfleet will eventually look like it does is a specter that cannot be ignored. What has happened? HOW did this happen? Who has dirt on who? Is NuTrek a scam? A tax write-off? Is 80% of the budget going to the 24 credited producers? I mean, how does a show with so few viewers even become profitable for a streaming service. Or even an asset and not a liability? Morg smells something fishy going on... maybe? At least according to his opinion. Rork and Glorg in no way suggest any illegal activity, but just perhaps activity that might not be moral at the very least. I mean, seriously? It's become a joke at this point. Anyway, no one can ever take my DS9 DVDs away from me. You'll have to pry them from my cold, dead hand. Anyway, enjoy this deep dive into old Trek. Rich and Mike promise more. MUCH MORE!!! WE WILL NOT STOP. WE WILL CONTINUE!!!

The annoying: Rich loving Kai Wynn as one of Trek's greatest villains is both accurate and yet completely on brand for him.

The good: The focus on "Duet," truly one of Trek's finest hours.

The sadly amusing: Interspersing clips of DS9 and other great Trek moments with the brainless effluvium of Starfleet Academy. I only made it through about 20 minutes of that show and amazingly it looks like it only continues to get worse.

The unintentionally amusing: Claiming "Trek never did romance well" while discussing the series that is the sole reason for real life Klingon weddings. I expect them to crap on Worf/Jadzia, but I guess we'll see.
 
The unintentionally amusing: Claiming "Trek never did romance well" while discussing the series that is the sole reason for real life Klingon weddings. I expect them to crap on Worf/Jadzia, but I guess we'll see.
I think they were referring to Worf x Troi in the final season of TNG, Odo x Kira & Bashir x Ezri in DS9 and 7 of 9 x Chakotay in Voyager.
 
Just because autistic nerd fanboys get married using IP from a show does NOT mean the show does romance well.

All it shows is nerds are lame losers.
 
I think they were referring to Worf x Troi in the final season of TNG, Odo x Kira & Bashir x Ezri in DS9 and 7 of 9 x Chakotay in Voyager.

Worf x Troi was ridiculous, as was Bashir/Ezri, but I liked Odo/Kira. I thought it was nicely bittersweet.

Just because autistic nerd fanboys get married using IP from a show does NOT mean the show does romance well.

All it shows is nerds are lame losers.

True, but it also shows that relationship resonated with people. There's a solid argument that Worf was better on DS9 than he was on TNG, and his relationship with Jadzia was a not insignificant reason for that.
 
It's been six days and I'm still mad the only reason Mike liked the worst episode in DS9 is to own the Chuds.

I always assumed he picked The Last Vampire Hunter on Best of the Worst because he was shitface drunk, but apparently his contrarian streak goes right down to the bone.

On the other hand, how serious was he? He described Duet as maybe the best episode of the franchise, unless I misheard.
 
It's not pronounced Gene-Luck Pick-card?
No, but I'm not even referring to that. Americans don't know even the most basic about foreign languages. In Europe, "w" is mostly pronounced like "v", "e" as the last letter is either silent or pronounced as "eh", etc. etc. I don't think I've ever heard an American pronounce "Weinstein" correctly and that's just an example. It's so tiresome, man.
 
No, but I'm not even referring to that. Americans don't know even the most basic about foreign languages. In Europe, "w" is mostly pronounced like "v", "e" as the last letter is either silent or pronounced as "eh", etc. etc. I don't think I've ever heard an American pronounce "Weinstein" correctly and that's just an example. It's so tiresome, man.
lol holy shit, my guy
 
Back
Top Bottom