Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Respectfully, I just don't agree at all. You're (proverbial you) still trying to shoehorn art into cookie-cutter packages. At most you could say the film didn't succeed, but they go a step further than that.stories set up expectations and have an obligation to pay them off
Stories have "rules" in the same way cooking has "rules."Respectfully, I just don't agree at all. You're (proverbial you) still trying to shoehorn art into cookie-cutter packages. At most you could say the film didn't succeed, but they go a step further than that.
The opposite end, defying expectations for the sake of it, can also be just as bad. But I just hate the idea that film should have "rules." Mike is guilty of this throughout his many film reviews and it's something that always annoyed me.
And yes, I realize the silliness of having this discussion around Jingle All the Way of all movies.
Edit: Couldn't finish that new "What Are Next?" video. Terrible.
Terrible analogy. Art is nothing like cooking.Stories have "rules" in the same way cooking has "rules."
True, but that video wrote itself. Already waiting for the 2026 version.How many times can they make the same video?
Wow. You really are autistic.Terrible analogy. Art is nothing like cooking.
gb2India, saarTerrible analogy. Art is nothing like cooking.
gb2India, saar
Okay, this was hilarious. Best laugh I've had from one of their videos in years.Newest video is out, another ‘What are next’
https://youtube.com/watch?v=u0JNJOVG1VA
I miss ‘Fuck you it’s January’
Edit: the only decent movie mentioned is the new Besson Dracula movie, which is actually fantastic.
Cooking has very clear and defined rules, because otherwise you can be sick or dead. Art doesn't have the same rigid limitations.Wow. You really are autistic.
Your avatar is a fox, your argument is invalid.gb2India, saar
Cooking has very clear and defined rules, because otherwise you can be sick or dead. Art doesn't have the same rigid limitations.
We'd still be stuck watching silent black-and-whites if the rules weren't meant to be broken.
You can add all the modifiers you want, but you're literally admitting it here. Cooking doesn't have the same luxury.and while they can be broken
You can add all the modifiers you want, but you're literally admitting it here. Cooking doesn't have the same luxury.
Someone doesn't know how to cookTerrible analogy. Art is nothing like cooking.
You guys aren't following the analogy at all and are getting bent out of shape about "muh cooking"You don't think recipes can be experimented with? You don't think there are dozens if not hundreds of variations on different recipes? Why do you think that? Are you stupid?
You guys aren't following the analogy at all and are getting bent out of shape about "muh cooking"
Your cooking experimentation is within the rules. You can't substitute water with bleach, like Flexo's example.
Art doesn't have the same rigid rules. And if it did we'd never have sound or color pictures.
If I write a film that defies your expectations, the most you can say is that it didn't work (for you). If I defy your expectations by using bleach in your next meal, you are dead.
The point is that art doesn't have the same clearly defined lines. Come on, this isn't hard.Wait ... your only point is meddling with the rules of cooking can have lethal consequences but meddling with the rules of art can't? That's the big thing you're hung up on?