Red Letter Media

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Favorite recurring character? (Select 4)

  • Jack / AIDSMobdy

    Votes: 257 24.0%
  • Josh / the Wizard

    Votes: 77 7.2%
  • Colin (Canadian #1)

    Votes: 460 42.9%
  • Jim (Canadian #2)

    Votes: 230 21.4%
  • Tim

    Votes: 386 36.0%
  • Len Kabasinski

    Votes: 208 19.4%
  • Freddie Williams

    Votes: 274 25.5%
  • Patton Oswalt

    Votes: 27 2.5%
  • Macaulay Culkin

    Votes: 541 50.4%
  • Max Landis

    Votes: 64 6.0%

  • Total voters
    1,073
Yeah, cashing out for four and a half billion and then letting the people who took over your IP take all the blame for trends you started is moving on.

Because, again, he's moved on and is enjoying his retirement. He did Star Wars for forty years, sold it when he was sixty nine and is eighty one right now.
Okay so we are making the "getting his shit raped is based, actually, because he got raped on purpose" argument. It's a bold stance, I'll give you that.

Did he really give it all up for only four billion? That's kind of insane. A huge multimedia empire, Indiana Jones too, all for basically a drop in the bucket on the industrial scale. The man really wanted out.
 
Okay so we are making the "getting his shit raped is based, actually, because he got raped on purpose" argument.
No, the argument is that Lucas cares a lot less about Star Wars than you, and that's based.
Did he really give it all up for only four billion?
Four and a half, which is one billion more than Disney's initial offer and half a billion more than Disney bought Marvel for.
A huge multimedia empire, Indiana Jones too,
Lucasfilm/Lucasarts in the early 2010s was a shell of what it was even half a decade before, let alone around the turn of the millennium. The prequel momentum had died out, the only thing being put out were Filoni Clone Wars, The Force Unleashed and a failed WoW-killer, Lucas had already torpedoed Indiana Jones with Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and criticizing the Prequels in general and Lucas in particular was at its cultural apex (in part because of RLM). His multimedia empire was in a comparable state to pre-Disney Marvel at the time.
 
No, the argument is that Lucas cares a lot less about Star Wars than you, and that's based.
You're phrasing the same idea in a less embarrassing way and calling it a new argument. I suppose the difference is meant to be that, in this disaffected framing, he's a roguish folk hero who hoodwinked the globohomo media empire with a raw deal and rode off into the sunset to the cheering of the townsfolk.

However, outside of a very specific audience, I think you're vastly overestimating the public's perception of Lucas. It seems to me most still view him as a hack, but now also as a sellout.

I will grant without any contest that Lucas certainly cares much less about his work than anticipated, though, which perhaps explains Filoni Wars. Or that strange SW DDR thing that came out around that time.

half a billion more than Disney bought Marvel for.
Marvel was basically a dead brand at that point. I'm impressed they went for that much almost as much as I am that LucasArts went for so little.
 
He "moved on" by selling his oeuvre into perpetual sodomy. No one knows or cares what he has done since that- they only know that George Lucas = Star Wars, and Star Wars = raped slop. This is a situation he engineered. Frankly, judging by some of the projects he greenlit in the waning days of the LucasArts era, it may be what he wanted, so I suppose you can make the argument that he's not taking it up the tailpipe in the sense that you can't rape the willing.
Lucas wanted to distance himself from Star Wars even before Return of the Jedi was made, so him cashing it out for billions and continuing not to give a fuck about it seems like a win for him.

Also, Marvel was almost done with Phase One of the MCU and was on the upswing when Disney bought them.
 
You're phrasing the same idea in a less embarrassing way
No, I'm saying you're attributing embarrassment where there is none. Mainstream opinion did not turn against Lucas for selling to Disney, and Disney's handling of Star Wars was the single best thing to happen to his public perception since the release of TPM. You can say his legacy - which is much larger than Star Wars as ILM, Skywalker Sounds and THX all owe their success to him - being Disney driving Star Wars into the ground is somehow some great moral failing on his part, sure, but I think you're greatly overestimating the amount of people who care about Lucas or actively hold a negative opinion of him.
Marvel was basically a dead brand at that point. I'm impressed they went for that much almost as much as I am that LucasArts went for so little.
LucasArts by that point was a zombie company. They had two major IPs, only one of which was actually culturally relevant, and were only producing a cartoon and The Force Unleashed by that point. To put this in perspective Disney acquired Pixar for seven and a half billion because Iger noticed that all the new animated characters that kids cared about were made by Pixar.
 
This should really be their new videos. Comment on movies and let some editors make it fun.
 
Mainstream opinion did not turn against Lucas for selling to Disney
Mainstream opinion was already against him when he sold to Disney. I would not estimate it has significantly improved among anyone other than true believers nostalgic for the good old days where they could buy their heaps of merch without guilt. The prequels are still frequently clowned upon, and Crystal Skull has never been rehabilitated even to the limited degree the prequels were.

To be clear, I enjoy the prequels, but the discourse has not improved a lot. If anything when I see them discussed I see more ST fans encouraged to take a dump on them, to say, "SW didn't get worse under Disney, look how shit this was."

Lucas wanted to distance himself from Star Wars even before Return of the Jedi was made, so him cashing it out for billions and continuing not to give a fuck about it seems like a win for him.
If apathy is the yardstick you measure victory by, I suppose so. Lucas does clearly give no fucks.

Also, Marvel was almost done with Phase One of the MCU and was on the upswing when Disney bought them.
That is true, the timeline was nebulous in my memory.
 
Mainstream opinion was already against him when he sold to Disney.
Sure, but that's not what's being argued. Lucas has never particularly cared about what people think of his movies, he was always petulantly insistent that they were his movies before selling. That might have been hypocritical, but he only did so under assurance that he would have an extensive degree of creative input/control that was promptly reneged on.
I would not estimate it has significantly improved among anyone other than true believers nostalgic for the good old days where they could buy their heaps of merch without guilt.
I think you are overestimating the amount of people who hate him. The average person who didn't like the prequels doesn't have some hateboner for Lucas, they just think he made some bad movies and got over it like he did. The sorts of people who took to streetcorners to sing songs about how Lucas raped their childhood have always been a minority and have only become more of one in the years since; if we were to actually take tally of people who actively hold a positive opinion about Lucas' qualities, again, it would likely have only increased because of Disney. Anecdotally that is what I have seen, even if a good bit of it is in the form of backhanded compliments.
To be clear, I enjoy the prequels, but the discourse has not improved a lot. If anything when I see them discussed I see more ST fans encouraged to take a dump on them, to say, "SW didn't get worse under Disney, look how shit this was."
Then you must not be plugged into the discourse because that's effectively the opposite of my experience and that of everyone else in the Star Wars Griefing and EFAP/Mauler threads, which are the two other big threads for talk about stuff like this.
 
Patreon Update:

New Video Tomorrow

Or rather maybe today (12/2) whenever you read this. 10am MST (Milwaukee Standard Time). A video where we discuss upcoming movies both rumored and confirmed. What are next? Now, it's fair to say we may have gone too far in a few places. It's intentional, of course, but I did try to diminish the effects of it. On this very day, we will also be back in the studio shooting a new video too! It's a topical discussion video with Mike, Jay and Rat Evans. What they'll be talkin about, Willis? Well, you'll have to wait and see until the video is out. So never fear RLM is back from Thanksgiving feast times and ready to get back to work. Our Christmas BOTW will also be shot in a week or so. Busy days ahead kids! So look out for new videos and content from the world's least loved content creators.
 
Last edited:
This should really be their new videos. Comment on movies and let some editors make it fun.
When was this commentary made?

More and more I am convinced they actually don't understand movies. They're complaining that the Mom didn't have an epic backstory on why she didn't get the doll instead. The whole point of the film is to put Arnold in goofy scenarios, everything else is pointless.

And then they complain it wasn't another generic holiday film with the feel-good ending where the two rivals come together. I've said it before, but all their criticisms boil down to how one film should be exactly like another. They have no frame of reference outside of common and overused tropes.

Then comes the retarded claim that items being out of stock doesn't exist anymore thanks to the internet, which is not only blatantly wrong, but some companies will handicap supply to artificially inflate demand (see PC hardware for one example).

Yes, I am mad and I will not tolerate blasphemy against Jingle All the Way!
 
Patreon Update:

New Video Tomorrow

Or rather maybe today (12/2) whenever you read this. 10am MST (Milwaukee Standard Time). A video where we discuss upcoming movies both rumored and confirmed. What are next? Now, it's fair to say we may have gone too far in a few places. It's intentional, of course, but I did try to diminish the effects of it. On this very day, we will also be back in the studio shooting a new video too! It's a topical discussion video with Mike, Jay and Rat Evans. What they'll be talkin about, Willis? Well, you'll have to wait and see until the video is out. So never fear RLM is back from Thanksgiving feast times and ready to get back to work. Our Christmas BOTW will also be shot in a week or so. Busy days ahead kids! So look out for new videos and content from the world's least loved content creators.
God, how do you write something like this and not immediately die from a fatal case of douche chills?
 
When was this commentary made?
They mentioned the year 2019 at one point (when Mike was joking about the end of the company), so it was quite a while ago.

Several years back, another channel released a similar cut of it.


I like that they don't have these taken down because they're fun to watch, and they actually increase interest in their commentaries. I never knew about them until I saw one of these clip videos, and it inspired me to listen to their full "The Room" commentary with the movie.
 
Newest video is out, another ‘What are next’


I miss ‘Fuck you it’s January’

Edit: the only decent movie mentioned is the new Besson Dracula movie, which is actually fantastic.
 
Last edited:
I miss ‘Fuck you it’s January’
Don't give up hope. There's still time.

And then they complain it wasn't another generic holiday film with the feel-good ending where the two rivals come together. I've said it before, but all their criticisms boil down to how one film should be exactly like another. They have no frame of reference outside of common and overused tropes.
I won't argue with the rest of your post because it's fair enough, but I will argue with this narrow point.

Because the POINT of the idea is the casting. If the movie wanted to have the Sinbad character just be opposed to Arnold the entire time, then what RLM is saying is that they should have cast a "meaner" or more villainous actor. (Danny Devito would have been a great choice.) In casting someone more family friendly and likeable, the movie is setting up - as they point out - more of a Planes, Trains, and Automobiles type movie of two foes bonding over the holidays which the movie never then pays off.

They are NOT comparing how one film should be exactly like another, they are talking about how stories set up expectations and have an obligation to pay them off. If Jingle all the Way wants more of a buddy comedy film, then it needs that pay off. If it wants more of a "foe/conflict" film, then it needs a different pay off. Their whole issue (and the issue with the film) is that it tries to play both angles and ends up pulling neither one off very well.

You're inflicting way more autism on the drunks then they're commentary. The group is just saying, "if you want X you need to do Y, here is an example that does Y very well."
 
Back
Top Bottom