Forget Baby Hitler, if you had a time machine would you go back in time and kill Baby George Lucas so you never had to deal with Star Wars discourse ever again?
Killing Star Wars would have dire effect on the timeline pop culture-wise.
No Star Wars means no Star Wars toys. Star Wars's toy line revolutionized the action figure industry with the advent and popularization of the 3.75 scale and affordable vehicle playsets that were made affordable due to them being made for 3.75 figures, killing Mego and the doll sized toy scale. Which in turn means no GI Joe 80s revival, which in turn means no Transformers since Transformers was inspired by GI Joe and how Hasbro worked with Marvel to create the lore/character details for GI Joe.
No Star Wars means Star Trek doesn't transition to the movie format; at best Star Wars Phase 2 happens instead and that gets canceled after a couple of years and since Spock wasn't part of Phase 2, his character becomes permanently written out of ST lore and we don't get the Khan/Search For Spock/Voyage Home trilogy and the pop culture milestone that was Spock's death in Khan.
No Star Wars means Carrie Fischer never becomes a go-two script doctor, who famously rewrote on the downlow, a lot of Hollywood scripts for big budget movies. Also, no Mark Hamill means we get stuck with Tim Curry in full "I hate being typecasted" mode as Batman the Animated Series's voice actor for Joker, where he does the character with an absolutely dire sounding Brocklyn accent.
No Star Wars means, that there is a good chance Marvel Comics might have gone out of business or got bought out sooner by an evil corporation as the Star Wars comic book series was an immediate hit for the company that was in dire financial straits in the late 70s.
I missed their Kenobi video (I was literally too busy at the time--I was taking care of a literal newborn around the time Kenobi came out haha).
They ... Liked it? Man, maybe they do need to start going to AA meetings ...
For me, the first time RLM had what I thought was a horrible take was when they were saying good things about the 4th Matrix movie (which is one of the biggest, most obnoxious pieces of dogshit I've ever watched). The 4th Matrix is such pseudo-intellectual garbage. If the soyface were a movie, it would be the 4th Matrix.
I can't hate the Matrix 4 because A. it undid the shitty ending for Neo and Trinity that the third film had for them and B. The creators of the Matrix managed to make a meta film about how Warner Brothers made them make the film lest someone else do it and rape the franchise and did a good job incorporating it into narrative as far as "This film shouldn't exist" and finding a reason for it happening, which is to say to give Trintiy and Neo a legitimate happy ending, which is something most revivals refuse to do as far as ending the film on a high note and not having completely destroyed the heroes in the name of current year politics.
GenX lived through Political Correctness and aggressive censorship by the Moral Majority, which is something some of you darn lawn kids have yet to experience (oh, don't fret, it's coming...) Certainly none of the social critics on YT have the first clue what's attached to the pendulum when it swings back. The classic 90s example was a Bill Hicks routine being censored on Letterman because the commercial break contained a big spending pro-life account.
RLM is trying to avoid taking a side in a corporate-generated illusionary culture war because they have already lived through two of them. They know it's marketing bullshit for shoddy products tempered by the hand wringing of advertisers. The closest Mike ever got was downing a bottle of vodka and flipping off the accusation that you hate women if you don't give money to Ghostbusters 2016, and that's not nearly crossing a picket line.
Bill Hicks 1993: "Comedy in the States has been totally gutted, it’s commercialized. They don’t have people on TV who have points of view, because that defies the status quo, and we can’t have that in the totalitarian mind-control government that runs the fuckin’ airwaves. I can’t get a shot there. I get David Letterman a lot. I love Letterman, but every time I go on, we have tiffs over material. They love me, but his people have this fictitious mainstream audience they think they play to..."
The religious right getting power was a faustian bargian the right made when they were in dire straits and currently, they are in the backseat bitch position to the populist wing of the right in part because the moral majority is why the left got so much power to begin with due to them ceding the culture war rather than fighting it to keep the left from gaining a monopology on it that allows them to do much of the evil they currently are able to do.
Also, RLM reek of the kind of lefties who desperately WANT to go back to the 90s if not mid-00s ala Malcolm McDowell being willing to burn entire solar systems to the ground in order to get back to the Nexus and the fictionalized version of the 90s that only exists in their heads. The same could be said for Bill Hicks too had he survived to the current year, though part of me thinks Hicks would have flipped right wing purely as a survival tactic once Hollywood and the media started crucifying and blacklisting anyone who didn't suck Obama off as being the second coming once he got elected and Hicks failing to cheer loud enough to please him and his handmaidens.