Red Letter Media

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Favorite recurring character? (Select 4)

  • Jack / AIDSMobdy

    Votes: 257 24.0%

  • Josh / the Wizard

    Votes: 77 7.2%

  • Colin (Canadian #1)

    Votes: 460 42.9%

  • Jim (Canadian #2)

    Votes: 230 21.4%

  • Tim

    Votes: 386 36.0%

  • Len Kabasinski

    Votes: 208 19.4%

  • Freddie Williams

    Votes: 274 25.5%

  • Patton Oswalt

    Votes: 27 2.5%

  • Macaulay Culkin

    Votes: 541 50.4%

  • Max Landis

    Votes: 64 6.0%
  • Total voters
    1,073
Rich calling Taylor Swift a man in drag conning millions of people is good, Rich is becoming ungovernable.
 
TVB said:
Man I still can't wait for them to talk about John Wick Chapter 4 for the next Half in the Bag which is coming not at all
Click to expand...
Really disagreed with what they had to say about what they had to say about the FNAF movie. I personally found it to be painfully boring and meandering, while that Nick Cage rip off movie was at least fun and at least things happened. Side note but while obviously they wouldnt know anything about the game lore, it was really disappointing that movie chose to be so safe and have none of the weird stuff that is actually in the games.
 
Flexo said:
As someone who's hometown was almost next door to mammoth cave... it feels me with strange pride that our auction video won.

I'm now trying to remember if anything that was shown ended up at our house...
Click to expand...
Oddly enough, this was posted on their Patreon:

There's a clip on YouTube from a 1974 movie that was shot at the Mammoth Caves Wandering Woods theme park in the little town. I tried to screen match as much as I could so I could say I did something completely pointless. Now, I suppose the next errand of futility would be to research IF any of the buildings we're sold and relocated. It's not entirely unheard of to move property... usually it's buildings of some historical significance where it's worth the effort and cost, but still... maybe that church and that gazebo still exist somewhere? Wouldn't that be a gas.
 

Attachments

  • ww7.jpg
    ww7.jpg
    519.6 KB · Views: 30
  • ww6.jpg
    ww6.jpg
    453.2 KB · Views: 31
  • ww5.jpg
    ww5.jpg
    353.3 KB · Views: 24
  • ww4.jpg
    ww4.jpg
    415.4 KB · Views: 26
  • ww4.jpg
    ww4.jpg
    415.4 KB · Views: 23
  • ww3.jpg
    ww3.jpg
    43.2 KB · Views: 27
  • ww 2.jpg
    ww 2.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 28
  • WW 1.jpg
    WW 1.jpg
    54.1 KB · Views: 29
Prince Vegeta said:
I think Mike likes Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. Which is correct because that movie is fucking great. Not Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Which is atrocious. I think they already talked about how shit it is going to be on a different re:view or something, about how unnecessary it is. But maybe I dreamt that last part.
Click to expand...
Apologies, I always confuse the title of the 1971 original and the 2000s remake for some reason. I guess it's because "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" rolls off the tongue better than "Willy Wonka and the Charlie Factory". Hollywood has been completely bankrupt since 2016-ish so it's not surprising that they would do another Wonka film.
 
Willie B. Hardigan said:
Apologies, I always confuse the title of the 1971 original and the 2000s remake for some reason. I guess it's because "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" rolls off the tongue better than "Willy Wonka and the Charlie Factory". Hollywood has been completely bankrupt since 2016-ish so it's not surprising that they would do another Wonka film.
Click to expand...
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is actually what the original book is called and what most adaptations and tie-ins are named after. The 1971 movie is unique in that I guess they wanted Willy Wonka to be in the title for whatever marketing reason.


There was also a 2017 animated movie called Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory which is the only other thing I see giving ol' Billy Dubs proper ownership of his own factory
 
Alex Yiik said:
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is actually what the original book is called and what most adaptations and tie-ins are named after. The 1971 movie is unique in that I guess they wanted Willy Wonka to be in the title for whatever marketing reason.


There was also a 2017 animated movie called Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory which is the only other thing I see giving ol' Billy Dubs proper ownership of his own factory
Click to expand...
From what I recall they altered the title because of the Vietnam War, which was still going but was winding down by then. The term 'victor charlie' and such would've still been fresh in people's minds and they wanted to avoid any association. Probably dumb but given the time, understandable.
 
Flexo said:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=fYgNqg6V8do
Half in the Bag catch-up.
Click to expand...
At 46:47 Mike says "I own Rich Evans". This only further confirms the theory that Mike and Rich are secretly married, and that Mike abuses Rich Evans sexually. Notice Jay's body language, how he was pretty relaxed throw out the rest of video but as soon as mike started talking about that, he rapidly closed off his legs and started looking down more, wherein before he was more comfortable with his demeanor. You can tell from Jay's forced laughter that he was on the verge of crying at that moment. In his mind, the only option for him was to do what he always does when Mike starts going off on another one of his weird sexual tangents again, which is chime in and make himself part of the joke, which is why at 46:50 he says "We own the copyright to Rich Evans".

The most indicative part was when Mike right after said "He signed some paperwork he didn't know what he was signing". Now we all know of the oh-so hilarious HITB arc of the gay wedding, which was speculated at the time as a kind of parody or mirroring of real events that was happening to the RLM crew. Some said it was Jay's real life wedding, other's speculated that it was Rich that was getting married. Now we know that, in realty, it was actually mike forcing Rich to sign marriage papers to be his lawful husband so he can physically abuse him as much as he wants and be protected by law while doing it.

To further add to the sickness of the whole situation, we need to remember that Rich is in fact 2 years older than Mike. They became best friends in high school, that means they were 17 and 15 respectively.
Imagine that, being so weak that a 15 year old is sexually abusing you and getting to control you like your personal beta bitch. How humiliating to let someone literally control every aspect of your life for the rest of your life all because you couldn't find a job as a carpenter. I hate Mike for being a fat fucking kike with zero talent, but I truly resent Rich for just how pathetic and weak he is.
 
Love Machine said:
it was really disappointing that movie chose to be so safe and have none of the weird stuff that is actually in the games.
Click to expand...
Really?

Someone who saw it was describing it to me, and all I could muster was "A lot of this shit sounds weird, like it only makes sense if you play the games."

So there was even weirder stuff that didn't make it in?
 
xXx: State of the Union said:
Really?

Someone who saw it was describing it to me, and all I could muster was "A lot of this shit sounds weird, like it only makes sense if you play the games."

So there was even weirder stuff that didn't make it in?
Click to expand...
Yea, the stuff in the movie is edited down and cleaned up. Probably to make it simpler to normie audience.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom