Red Letter Media

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Favorite recurring character? (Select 4)

  • Jack / AIDSMobdy

    Votes: 257 24.0%
  • Josh / the Wizard

    Votes: 77 7.2%
  • Colin (Canadian #1)

    Votes: 460 42.9%
  • Jim (Canadian #2)

    Votes: 230 21.4%
  • Tim

    Votes: 386 36.0%
  • Len Kabasinski

    Votes: 208 19.4%
  • Freddie Williams

    Votes: 274 25.5%
  • Patton Oswalt

    Votes: 27 2.5%
  • Macaulay Culkin

    Votes: 541 50.4%
  • Max Landis

    Votes: 64 6.0%

  • Total voters
    1,073
Pretty good spotlight episode imo. Just the trio which is welcome. Rich not paying attention for the last 5 minutes is a strong ending. It's pretty shocking how long RLM have been making videos now. Say what you want about their quality or trepidation about sharing any potentially controversial opinions now, but it's impressive that they've been able to maintain their steam for so long in the YouTube world. I kinda wish they'd give one more shot at a feature length film but I think it's probably too much work for them with too little reward when they can just keep cashing patreon checks and utilizing all the sets they've already built.
 
Trying to stir shit on Twitter. You will not be surprised to learn that many uses of this hashtag just feature images of Rich Evans.

rlmdumpster.png
 
Rich obviously wasn't as enthused with the movie as Mike and Jay, who find it to be one of the funniest things ever. It's as Mike basically admitted: it's only something a filmmaking nerd would find truly hilarious. Knowing that, I'm surprised they did a feature episode about it. I was empathizing with Rich's struggle to pretend at amusement.
 
Rich obviously wasn't as enthused with the movie as Mike and Jay, who find it to be one of the funniest things ever. It's as Mike basically admitted: it's only something a filmmaking nerd would find truly hilarious. Knowing that, I'm surprised they did a feature episode about it. I was empathizing with Rich's struggle to pretend at amusement.

They are doing that more and more. There have been a number of BOTW where they have voted for those where it's only enjoyable if you understand the filmmaking process. They have also been reviewing more of those 'autist' films, and less popular films. I don't know if it's them getting tired of popular films, or just their interests changing over time.

One of the things I liked the most about the plinkett reviews was that it broke down why a scene works (i.e. the opening scene from Star Wars). I wish they did more of that with the films they reviewed, and even in BOTW.
 
Kind of disappointing that they didn't do another Deuandra Brown film like they alluded they would quite a while ago. I guess they just didn't want to deal with her copyright striking them again.

It's strange that they talked about having watched this film together multiple times on movie nights but Rich hasn't seen it before; does he not attend?
 
Kind of disappointing that they didn't do another Deuandra Brown film like they alluded they would quite a while ago. I guess they just didn't want to deal with her copyright striking them again.

It's strange that they talked about having watched this film together multiple times on movie nights but Rich hasn't seen it before; does he not attend?
I've wondered that too, maybe they wanna save rich's reaction for when they film
 
They are doing that more and more. There have been a number of BOTW where they have voted for those where it's only enjoyable if you understand the filmmaking process. They have also been reviewing more of those 'autist' films, and less popular films. I don't know if it's them getting tired of popular films, or just their interests changing over time.

One of the things I liked the most about the plinkett reviews was that it broke down why a scene works (i.e. the opening scene from Star Wars). I wish they did more of that with the films they reviewed, and even in BOTW.
Eh, they were never that keyed onto the popular movies in the first place. They always have been B movie aficionados. Now, while I still argue that 50s-70s B movies are generally superior to 80s B movies, they've always been interested in these kinds of movies over Hollywood productions.

Why do I argue early B movies were superior on average? Because they try to look like movies even with weird premises and were the basis for most science fiction of that time. Yeah, sure you can point to Santa Claus v. Martians or Plan 9 from Outer Space, but it's also the era where you get Them! and The Day the Earth Stood Still. I'd also argue most of the Godzilla movies fit into the B movie genre too, but that affects the average too much. Even mid-tier stuff would be Night of the Lepus or The Blob* still look like movies, so I can always say these filmmakers tried their best with the often stupid premises that come with it. 80s B movies have that VHS low quality look to them which made its cheapness unacceptably bad. No budget means the cinematography also had a general lack of planning, so it's shot for efficiency reasons and it compounds the visual problems even more. Yeah, sure RLM point and laugh at this sort of thing, but it's still junk to watch IRL.

*The Blob is the only horror movie I know of where characters actually use the Scientific method. They try throwing acid at it, shooting it, zapping it, and Steve McQueen figured out it doesn't like being frozen after it tried to avoid the restaurant's freezer. Most horror protagonists scream and run away.
 
I was referring more to Half in the Bag, where early on they reviewed most of the summer blockbusters.
I honestly can't say I mind, especially when the vast majority of what's considered "summer blockbusters" are just capeshit and reboots/sequels/adaptions/whatever. Although I wish they'd talked about The Creator. They'll probably touch on it in the catch-up.

I much more prefer when they spotlight smaller, quality movies. I watched Kid Detective based on their recommendation and enjoyed it a lot.
 
Oh, sure. A lot of some of the stuff they have spoken about has been interesting, and I know capeshit has become generic bullshit. Its more part of a broader pattern.

What I would like more of, is for them to delve a bit deeper into the filmmaking theory about why a scene doesn't work, or why the writers were writing things the way they did. To me, that is the more interesting part.
 
They are doing that more and more. There have been a number of BOTW where they have voted for those where it's only enjoyable if you understand the filmmaking process. They have also been reviewing more of those 'autist' films, and less popular films. I don't know if it's them getting tired of popular films, or just their interests changing over time.

One of the things I liked the most about the plinkett reviews was that it broke down why a scene works (i.e. the opening scene from Star Wars). I wish they did more of that with the films they reviewed, and even in BOTW.
I think the guys are at a place now with their channel where they're only doing things they want and are no longer chasing views. Even though I don't enjoy everything they do as much as I used to, I'd say they've earned it. It's like they're semi-retired.
 
I broadly agree, although they have also tamed down their act. Now, I don't know if that's because of YouTube policies or them becoming older.

They have produced a lot of good content for a long time, and so deserve the benefit of the doubt. Having said that, I find myself always re-watching their older content, and not much of their newer content. I still enjoy some of their new content, and Noiselund remix of their stuff is great.
 
Back
Top Bottom