- Joined
- Aug 8, 2017
Well, time to throw a flaming pig through their window.You have to understand, I messaged them about it over a year ago and got no response regarding it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, time to throw a flaming pig through their window.You have to understand, I messaged them about it over a year ago and got no response regarding it.
Or a gator in their kitchen?Well, time to throw a flaming pig through their window.
Why not both?Or a gator in their kitchen?
We'll get flying unicorns with laser eyes and miniguns in rdo before we get undead nightmare or any single player DLC, unfortunately.We're almost at 3 years at this point.
I'd be lying if I said I didn't enjoy RDOnline being a giant dumpster fire. Should have gave us Undead Nightmare dammit
Speaking of things, I really wouldn't mind a RDR3 where they show the rise of the van der Lind gang. I always wanted to know just how the gang ended up being a bunch of cutthroats with delusions of grandeur after I read Arthur's newspaper snippet about his first bank heist. I mean, its obvious in hindsight how it became a thing, but its still something I'd love to see first hand. Can play as a young Arthur Morgan and show how he goes from a young, naïve idealist to someone willing to punch the shit out of a dying man for money.I really wish something like would've happened in the actual game. Dutch's character arc during the time between the main story and the epilogue just feels kinda unfinished.
No, fuck that. No more prequels. Maybe have the van der Lind gang show up as a cameo or a side mission but fuck I want an actual new story. I can only hear "the death of the west" so many fucking times.Speaking of things, I really wouldn't mind a RDR3 where they show the rise of the van der Lind gang. I always wanted to know just how the gang ended up being a bunch of cutthroats with delusions of grandeur after I read Arthur's newspaper snippet about his first bank heist. I mean, its obvious in hindsight how it became a thing, but its still something I'd love to see first hand. Can play as a young Arthur Morgan and show how he goes from a young, naïve idealist to someone willing to punch the shit out of a dying man for money.
I was talking about the opposite of that, dumbass, where we see the rise of the Legend of the East, as he goes from naive idealist to jaded outlaw who will do anything if the price is right.No, fuck that. No more prequels. Maybe have the van der Lind gang show up as a cameo or a side mission but fuck I want an actual new story. I can only hear "the death of the west" so many fucking times.
Yeah and then you just get generic GTA "dark side of the american dream" again.I was talking about the opposite of that, dumbass, where we see the rise of the Legend of the East, as he goes from naive idealist to jaded outlaw who will do anything if the price is right.
Rockstar: "You want Undead Nightmare 2? How about a Halloween Pass instead?"
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vFLHoGqL52A
Just give us Undead Nightmare 2, or put this shit into story-mode.Rockstar: "You want Undead Nightmare 2? How about a Halloween Pass instead?"
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vFLHoGqL52A
Speaking of things, I really wouldn't mind a RDR3 where they show the rise of the van der Lind gang. I always wanted to know just how the gang ended up being a bunch of cutthroats with delusions of grandeur after I read Arthur's newspaper snippet about his first bank heist. I mean, its obvious in hindsight how it became a thing, but its still something I'd love to see first hand. Can play as a young Arthur Morgan and show how he goes from a young, naïve idealist to someone willing to punch the shit out of a dying man for money.
No, fuck that. No more prequels. Maybe have the van der Lind gang show up as a cameo or a side mission but fuck I want an actual new story. I can only hear "the death of the west" so many fucking times.
I think the story just needs to end with Jack.
Have the third game be set during The Great Depression, have Jack fuck around with other outlaws for a while before retiring to finish his book on his dad, and Arthur before subsequently dying, or whatever.
No more prequels.
Stop going backwards.
I'm tired of foregone-conclusions.
You already have a story.
Now fucking finish it.
Frankly I'd prefer the prequel approach where it's an unrelated story at the height of the wild west. I like that we don't know how Jack's story ends beyond the fact he wrote a book.Yeah, my opinion is that RDR3 should either be:
1850-60s during the California Gold Rush, set in New Austin + California + a Mexico expanded southwards, and refocusing on a lone drifter character + spaghetti western themes. Maybe some cameos from RDR2, but no more prior character involvement in the game.
1930s, set in a modernized version of the RDR + RDRII maps, maybe expanded northwards to a Chicago-style city. Basically a Bonnie and Clyde story focused on Jack. He would be around 35 by then, same age as the other protagonists. It would feel a little similar to Mafia, but I think the key would be to keep a largely rural setting and emphasis on the feeling of drifting around this American landscape as opposed to being city-bound.
It would be cool to see RDR's world at the height of the old west rather than it's decline.Speaking of things, I really wouldn't mind a RDR3 where they show the rise of the van der Lind gang. I always wanted to know just how the gang ended up being a bunch of cutthroats with delusions of grandeur after I read Arthur's newspaper snippet about his first bank heist. I mean, its obvious in hindsight how it became a thing, but its still something I'd love to see first hand. Can play as a young Arthur Morgan and show how he goes from a young, naïve idealist to someone willing to punch the shit out of a dying man for money.
This is also a great idea.I think the story just needs to end with Jack.
Have the third game be set during The Great Depression, have Jack fuck around with other outlaws for a while before retiring to finish his book on his dad, and Arthur before subsequently dying, or whatever.
I would say 1870s or even the 1880s, not too far removed but still at the wild west's peak.Yeah, my opinion is that RDR3 should either be:
1850-60s during the California Gold Rush, set in New Austin + California + a Mexico expanded southwards, and refocusing on a lone drifter character + spaghetti western themes. Maybe some cameos from RDR2, but no more prior character involvement in the game.
A Chicago style city would be great, but yeah, the main emphasis should be on rural areas.1930s, set in a modernized version of the RDR + RDRII maps, maybe expanded northwards to a Chicago-style city. Basically a Bonnie and Clyde story focused on Jack. He would be around 35 by then, same age as the other protagonists. It would feel a little similar to Mafia, but I think the key would be to keep a largely rural setting and emphasis on the feeling of drifting around this American landscape as opposed to being city-bound.
red dead revival. they brought back arthur morgan from the deadYou're all wrong. You set RDR3 2000 years into the future where it's now a space western. RDR 3000.
Revived all three protagonists. John Marston, Arthur Morgan and the original Red Harlow.red dead revival. they brought back arthur morgan from the dead