Racist Book Club - The Fun Kind of Banned Books

[Meiwaku]

Ben Klassen wrote a series of books for a movement he called "Creativity" which advocated for a sound mind and "salubrious living."

It's been scrubbed, but if I find it or any of his books, I'll edit or add to the thread.

Double posting because I found it and all his other work in pdf. Posting links to the sauce and associated pdfs

https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupname?key=Klassen%2C%20Ben

I'll add this to the old OP chart later

 

[Rome's rightful successor]

Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard. These two were highly educated but probably the most racist men in American history. Stoddard was a hardcore racist man. He was a leading member of the American Eugenics movement and Klan member.
Some of what these books are about is kinda interesting looking back 100 years. They've aged somewhat interestingly, especially Stoddard's who was a friend of the Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger.

The Passing of a Great Race by Madison Grant

The French Revolution in San Domingo By Lothrop Stoddard
The New World Of Islam by Lothrop Stoddard
The Revolt Against Civilization by Lothrop Stoddard
The Rising Tide of Color against White World Supremacy by Lothrop Stoddard

 

[parody]

Anyone posted this yet?

The Complete List Of The One Thousand And Thirty Jewish Expulsions In Human History​

https://archive.org/details/the-complete-list-of-the-one-thousand-and-thirty-jewish-expulsions-in-human-history/mode/2up

 

[CryptoHermit]

Finished Nutcrankr by Dan Baltic and it was pretty awesome. Independent author so there's no ebook pdf yet. It's modern Don Quixote where the protagonist is a delusional extreme right-wing radical spiraling throughout the book after being fired from his normie job for being caught writing his manifesto "The Project" on company time. Think of Confederacy of Dunces where Ignatius J Reilly isn't self-aware at all and quotes Spengler, Nietzsche, Evola and Schmidt to the bewilderment of everyone around him. It's a completely unreliable narrator with sober subtext.

 

[Safari]

Think of Confederacy of Dunces where Ignatius J Reilly isn't self-aware at all and quotes Spengler, Nietzsche, Evola and Schmidt to the bewilderment of everyone around him. It's a completely unreliable narrator with sober subtext.

Wow he's literally me!

 

[The Fountainhead]

Kendall has had one of his non-fiction books banned from Amazon. But not this novel:

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

Camp at the Saints it's actually a really good book and he's 100% correct on the Indian question and the fact that people are delusional

 

[Jhonny Jhon]

So many of the links in OP are already dead, sad.

 

[Meiwaku]

So many of the links in OP are already dead, sad.

Which ones? Lmk so I can try to fix them

 

[Hypercop]

Thoughts on Murray's accomplishments map?

 

[Jhonny Jhon]

Which ones? Lmk so I can try to fix them

It's actually working now, they are all internal links. I guess the ooperator fixed it by casting the troon menace and their ddos attacks back to the outer darkness.

 

[Briananderson1138]

Not racist, per se, but some a nice archive of documents which show that the Ottoman slave trade wasn't the humanitarian institution that certain people seem to think it was.
All these about slavery in Eastern Europe are from the references to the Wikipedia articles on the Crimean–Nogai slave raids in Eastern Europe and Black Sea Slave Trade: even they have to admit how cruel it was.
I've also included an extra special bonus PDF clearly showing that the Arabs were indeed racist.

 

[parody]

This showed up on my FYP today, a collection of contemporary accounts from European settlers concerning the savagery of native American tribesmen.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/780787.Scalp_Dance

 

[Scream Aim Fire]

Did a bit of light reading through The Turner Diaries a while back; not quite my cup of tea, even though the author more-or-less nailed how fucked the woke are in the modern age. That said, I will say that the writer at least tried to insert some humanity into the protagonist, despite what reviews tend to say:

Spoiler: Sperging

For instance, Tv Tropes (yes, I'm well-aware of how faggy the site is) has this written under their "Strawnman has a Point" tag on the YMMV page here:

"A libertarian member of the racist organization early in its existence argues (quite correctly) that their wave of terror is doing nothing more than causing the government to clamp down even harder on normal Americans and that they're killing too many innocents which is causing the general public to hate them, which is entirely true. Of course the main character/narrator ignores the man's observations and has him executed for not being fully committed to the cause."

Funny thing is... it's not exactly accurate to what happens in the actual book. In the book itself, the guy's been put on an actual trial by the Organization's heads, and when he brings up that the members haven't been the best at avoid non-combatant casualties... Turner and co. outright agree with him, stating that it's a shit thing, but they can't avoid civilian casualties explicitly because the don't have the resources or manpower to conduct a more precise operation. Furthermore, the eventual execution was because the guy in question was on the verge of selling out the Organization, being a loose end; even then, the higher-ups were the ones that ordered the guy killed, and Turner makes it clear that it was very dirty business and that he felt like shit for it.

Bit more morally murky than portraying the MC as a strawman, eh? The rest of Tv Tropes' pages on the book try are pretty similar; doing whatever they can to demonize the protagonist and co. while making the System and general villains seem more likable, despite claiming to be non-biased as much as possible.

Also, they keep bringing the OKC Bombing and Columbine incidents being connected to this book; question, how truthful is that? Not familiar with either, aside from the aftereffects of the latter.

 

[Turquoise]

@Scream Aim Fire

McVeigh loved The Turner Diaries; no doubt about it. To what extent he conceived of and carried out the plan himself is very much up for debate though.

Dylan and Eric were rebels without a cause. If they'd read The Turner Diaries at all, I doubt it resonated with either of them beyond guns and bombs.

 

[parody]

Also, they keep bringing the OKC Bombing and Columbine incidents being connected to this book; question, how truthful is that? Not familiar with either, aside from the aftereffects of the latter.

Dylan and Eric were level 1 racists. They were just weird losers pretending to be edgy, they never expressed any actual knowledge of anything resembling racialism or race realism. Same with the nazi shit, they were total posers.

 

[888Flux]

Did a bit of light reading through The Turner Diaries a while back; not quite my cup of tea, even though the author more-or-less nailed how fucked the woke are in the modern age

The Turner Diaries is chudslop. Read The Brigade by Harold A. Covington if you want true kino

https://archive.org/details/the-brigade-by-h.-a.-covington

 

[Scream Aim Fire]

The Turner Diaries is chudslop. Read The Brigade by Harold A. Covington if you want true kino

https://archive.org/details/the-brigade-by-h.-a.-covington

Bit late, but thanks for the recommendation; haven't read through the whole book myself just yet, but I'll try and give it a go sometime.

I do want to ask though; why is The Turner Diaries pretty much the only book I hear about when retards screech about Nazis? Seriously, if the woketards ever bring up books in relation to racism or fascism or whatever, The Turner Diaries is the only thing they even mention, despite there being tons of other options. Yeah, I get that fags are all one-note retards that can't think for themselves, but you'd still think they'd branch out a bit sooner or later...

 

[General Emílio Médici]

Yeah, I get that fags are all one-note retards that can't think for themselves

That's about it really.

These people are proud of their ignorance of their enemies. Leftist hate of rightists is a lot closer to religious hatred than regular political one, which is hilarious because the right are the ones meant to be religious. They treat mere contact with the material of the enemy as if you were being exposed to radioactive fallout, they refuse to touch it and be contaminated, they will instead rely on "academic sources" and "fact checkers" to inform them on what these evil books are and what they say.

 

[Scream Aim Fire]

That's about it really.

These people are proud of their ignorance of their enemies. Leftist hate of rightists is a lot closer to religious hatred than regular political one, which is hilarious because the right are the ones meant to be religious. They treat mere contact with the material of the enemy as if you were being exposed to radioactive fallout, they refuse to touch it and be contaminated, they will instead rely on "academic sources" and "fact checkers" to inform them on what these evil books are and what they say.

Well, that certainly explains the rather ridiculously inaccurate reviews I've seen of The Turner Diaries; seriously, half the reviews I've seen often get basic facts about the main characters wrong, often to try and make them look as mindlessly evil as possible. I mentioned it briefly on that review you replied to me on.