r/mendrawingwomen - "STOP DRAWING WOMEN THE WAY YOU WANT TO"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
We made this woman you drew to look like a prepubescent boy, look like an actual woman!
*gasps of horror*

These people.
 
TL;DR

Men like secondary sex characteristics, and since there are women (or troons) that lack these characteristics, the only way they can lash out is to attack people drawing those characteristics.
Petty.
 
Fish Fudge said:
Why do these sadbrained losers always talk in corporate marketing speak - "we live in an age where it's very dificult to get a new IP started"

What a roundabout way of saying you've got no good ideas and no talent.
Click to expand...
Woah now, I just consume product and get excited for next product, I don't make product.
 
Fish Fudge said:
Why do these sadbrained losers always talk in corporate marketing speak - "we live in an age where it's very dificult to get a new IP started"
Click to expand...
Because everything they know comes from access media (i.e. glorified advertising) like Kotaku and similar shit rags. Since blue checkmarks and journos talk like this and they claim to be smart, these people copy them to seem equally smart.

Plus a few are probably paid shills from activist orgs or corporations, or otherwise people trying to get paid for shilling garbage media or ideologies.
 
Absolute-Despair said:
Talking about furry art implies that you look up furry art. So unless a furry is popular like that one bunny chick from space jam, they probably won’t mention it in case of embarrassment.

By my guess I’d say at least one in every four is a furry, possibly more, maybe less
Click to expand...
Uncle Warren said:
I would think they view them as more animal than human so it doesn't really count.
Click to expand...
BoobWhiskers said:
I think considering everything ELSE going on in furry art, the chicks having tiddies is probably an afterthought compared to the 'oh my god that six-titted panther centaur is shoving a dude into his Prius-sized dick'.
Click to expand...
Belvedere said:
Probably they even know that attempting to criticize furry art is a fool's errand, for starters the characters aren't human so the "realism" argument they use as the standard measuring stick to beat on the anatomy of sexy women goes out the window. For example, imagine how would the argument of "where are her organs?" land when they criticize a drawing of a female character with a thin waist and the character happens to be an anthropomorphic wasp?
Click to expand...
Guess that’s probably part of the reason why most of the furry fandom is a staunch ally of the woke crowd (the other part, obviously, being that they’re generally sympathetic to “those” kinds of people).
Fish Fudge said:
It's wild to think I live in an age where it's 100% socially acceptable for women to be whores on Onlyfans, but it's not okay to draw pictures of them like whores on Onlyfans.

what a time to be alive
Click to expand...
It too puzzles me how these people, who get super mad at sexy portrayals of women in fiction to the point of having cowed media creators into being conservative with how they design/write their female characters and call anyone who critiques their brand of purtianism a “manbaby creep who’s only interested in characters they can fuck”, are also paradoxically open, sex-obsessed coomers & highly vocal supporters of porngraphy, sex work, polymory & women IRL flaunting their sexuality & being promiscuous (unless they’re a booth babe or cheerleader for some reason) and denounce the hell out of right-wing sexual puritans, religious fundies & SWERFs (who at least are more consistent with their prudishness). These people also claim to champions of creative freedom but r/mendrawingwomen proves that claim to be a load of cow crap. In the past, I’ve made comparisons to many socialist nations who claim to be workers paradises of equality, but really, they’re only a paradise to those who are members of the ruling party and for everyone else, it’s a third world hellhole.

But do ya know what grinds my gears more than leftists who openly push this weird, contradictory brand of sexual purtianism? The leftists who act completely oblivious to it as if it doesn’t exist and play dumb when someone brings up the topic. Case in point;
1633721846691.jpeg

“Leftists can like ass too” well the existence of r/mendrawingwomen & Tropes vs Women says otherwise. Another example is this one leftist I had a little chat with on twitter and even though I showed him numerous, clear cut examples of left-wing prudishness, he kept downplaying and even outright denying it. Granted, he was civil to me and never once called me a bigot or Nazi, but my god he was a dense motherfucker. Thick as a post and stubborn as mule. People like him and the other leftist in the pic above (who goes by the name of Suris The “Skeptic”) are the very definition of useful idiot.
emptyblu said:
Btw the person who drew that redesign is a women.
Click to expand...
If you were to point that out to them, they’d probably resort to the old “internalised misogyny” card. Seriously, if I didn’t know of the existence of a certain few “real-life Uncle Ruckus’s” and the fact that many white leftists seem to hate themselves for being white, I would’ve assumed internalised bigotry was a load of bullshit they made up to justify silencing individual women/minority voices they don’t like without coming across as a bigot.
 
Mr Metron666 said:
It too puzzles me how these people, who get super mad at sexy portrayals of women in fiction to the point of having cowed media creators into being conservative with how they design/write their female characters and call anyone who critiques their brand of purtianism a “manbaby creep who’s only interested in characters they can fuck”, are also paradoxically open, sex-obsessed coomers & highly vocal supporters of porngraphy, sex work, polymory & women IRL flaunting their sexuality & being promiscuous (unless they’re a booth babe or cheerleader for some reason) and denounce the hell out of right-wing sexual puritans, religious fundies & SWERFs (who at least are more consistent with their prudishness). These people also claim to champions of creative freedom but r/mendrawingwomen proves that claim to be a load of cow crap. In the past, I’ve made comparisons to many socialist nations who claim to be workers paradises of equality, but really, they’re only a paradise to those who are members of the ruling party and for everyone else, it’s a third world hellhole.

But do ya know what grinds my gears more than leftists who openly push this weird, contradictory brand of sexual purtianism? The leftists who act completely oblivious to it as if it doesn’t exist and play dumb when someone brings up the topic. Case in point;
View attachment 2608773
Click to expand...

The purity argument from the perspective of the left and right are basically both sides of the same coin.
Premarital sex is a sin yet religious people engage in sexual intercourse and lie about it anyway. The left support prostitution and polyamory but consider modeling, cheerleading, and sexy cartoon women as “objectifying”.

They’re both hypocrites, however the lefts hypocrisy on it is far more infuriating. If you lean left and accept one form of sexual expression but then condemn another as bad, then your not as sex positive as you trick yourself into thinking you are.

I think being a puritan is a stupid mindset to have, just appreciate the tities and ass like a normal person,
only dumb virgins try to make it political.
 
Mr Metron666 said:
It too puzzles me how these people, who get super mad at sexy portrayals of women in fiction
Click to expand...
they are pedos
Mr Metron666 said:
call anyone who critiques their brand of purtianism a “manbaby creep who’s only interested in characters they can fuck”, are also paradoxically open, sex-obsessed coomers & highly vocal supporters of porngraphy, sex work, polymory & women IRL flaunting their sexuality & being promiscuous (unless they’re a booth babe or cheerleader for some reason)
Click to expand...
projection from the pedos
 
Mr Metron666 said:
Guess that’s probably part of the reason why most of the furry fandom is a staunch ally of the woke crowd (the other part, obviously, being that they’re generally sympathetic to “those” kinds of people).

It too puzzles me how these people, who get super mad at sexy portrayals of women in fiction to the point of having cowed media creators into being conservative with how they design/write their female characters and call anyone who critiques their brand of purtianism a “manbaby creep who’s only interested in characters they can fuck”, are also paradoxically open, sex-obsessed coomers & highly vocal supporters of porngraphy, sex work, polymory & women IRL flaunting their sexuality & being promiscuous (unless they’re a booth babe or cheerleader for some reason) and denounce the hell out of right-wing sexual puritans, religious fundies & SWERFs (who at least are more consistent with their prudishness). These people also claim to champions of creative freedom but r/mendrawingwomen proves that claim to be a load of cow crap. In the past, I’ve made comparisons to many socialist nations who claim to be workers paradises of equality, but really, they’re only a paradise to those who are members of the ruling party and for everyone else, it’s a third world hellhole.

But do ya know what grinds my gears more than leftists who openly push this weird, contradictory brand of sexual purtianism? The leftists who act completely oblivious to it as if it doesn’t exist and play dumb when someone brings up the topic. Case in point;
View attachment 2608773
“Leftists can like ass too” well the existence of r/mendrawingwomen & Tropes vs Women says otherwise. Another example is this one leftist I had a little chat with on twitter and even though I showed him numerous, clear cut examples of left-wing prudishness, he kept downplaying and even outright denying it. Granted, he was civil to me and never once called me a bigot or Nazi, but my god he was a dense motherfucker. Thick as a post and stubborn as mule. People like him and the other leftist in the pic above (who goes by the name of Suris The “Skeptic”) are the very definition of useful idiot.

If you were to point that out to them, they’d probably resort to the old “internalised misogyny” card. Seriously, if I didn’t know of the existence of a certain few “real-life Uncle Ruckus’s” and the fact that many white leftists seem to hate themselves for being white, I would’ve assumed internalised bigotry was a load of bullshit they made up to justify silencing individual women/minority voices they don’t like without coming across as a bigot.
Click to expand...
I would argue there are some left-leaning porn producers and erotic content creators who aren't massively prude (still are though). They're content allegedly caters to a different sort fo gaze so a good few do I have content most normies might not vibe with. I found a twitter artist the other day saying something about basic cishet porn being so gross but drawing equally gross stuff with rail thin dad bod boys getting railed like no tomorrow.

it's not that they hate porn and cheesecake, they only like it when it's a certain form of cheesecake meant to provoke something towards anyone who isn't super totally a hella queer fake woke person. that, and they'll take any example of sexy role reversals even when the person in question was actually underage or downright kind of racist.

Dude, I don't want to see hairy fat people bumping uglies, but this somehow makes me racist how?
 
Last edited:
weirdMcGee said:
I would argue there are some left-leaning porn producers and erotic content creators who aren't massively prude (still are though). They're content allegedly caters to a different sort fo gaze so a good few do I have content most normies might not vibe with. I found a twitter artist the other day saying something about basic cishet porn being so gross but drawing equally gross stuff with rail thin dad bod boys getting railed like no tomorrow.

it's not that they hate porn and cheesecake, they only like it when it's a certain form of cheesecake might to provoke something towards anyone who isn't super totally a hella queer fake woke person. that, and they'll take any example of sexy role reversals even when the person in that was actually underage or downright kind of racist.

Dude, I don't want to see hairy fat people bumping uglies, but this somehow makes me racist how?
Click to expand...
In short, "stop liking things I don't like!".
 
KokoroKoroki said:
Is it even possible for Redditors to write a short and simple answer for something instead of spouting off monologues like an anime villain explaining their plans?
Click to expand...
Leftoids have to contort around their ideas to make them seem sensible.

Someone from the Right can just call you nigger and move on.
 
After reading through this thread, it's obvious the entire subreddit is about protecting these peoples own egos and body image. I see these subjects come up alot in female/trans spaces on the internet, the argument that "thats impossible, thats not what a real woman looks like" "Thats unrealistic". Yet after my experience on the internet. It turns out that theres several male communities on the internet that spend all their time trying to collect real photos and videos of real women that satisfy their fetish for a certain "look". It really goes to show you how variant human anatomy can be.

Oversexualized Bodies
D5RTP8NWsAYSyNR.jpg
43397513_853778394810729_7905165334884982526_n.jpg

Or breasts that big cant be real
1o.png

Muscle Girls
aNOUcuRQGkarZejwkCjS70f6XdaKmWJzkjKO1p8pBKw.jpg

Over 6'5
longest-legs-2.jpg

All the way to super petite under 4'7
D0uCPW7WsAAYuvs.jpg

Sorry for the autistic rant, it just irks me that they have no idea about human anatomy at all, and have no desire to learn.
 
b0x said:
After reading through this thread, it's obvious the entire subreddit is about protecting these peoples own egos and body image. I see these subjects come up alot in female/trans spaces on the internet, the argument that "thats impossible, thats not what a real woman looks like" "Thats unrealistic". Yet after my experience on the internet. It turns out that theres several male communities on the internet that spend all their time trying to collect real photos and videos of real women that satisfy their fetish for a certain "look". It really goes to show you how variant human anatomy can be.

Oversexualized Bodies
View attachment 2896398
View attachment 2896434

Or breasts that big cant be real
View attachment 2896415

Muscle Girls
View attachment 2896455

Over 6'5
View attachment 2896459

All the way to super petite under 4'7
View attachment 2896436

Sorry for the autistic rant, it just irks me that they have no idea about human anatomy at all, and have no desire to learn.
Click to expand...
r/mendrawingwomen's ideal body is apparently Abby from TLOU2. I think it's fairly obvious they have a very distorted view of the average women, which is ironically what they accuse their critics of.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom