r/Gamerghazi - Dangerhair SJW Fags and their hatred of everything fun including Kiwi Farms

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Anyone who cares about Gamergate in 2017 is a sad case.

Agreed. Anyone who is remotely sane about the issue realizes it ended a LONG time ago, but it's become a tired boogeyman that is relentless flogged, mostly by the GamerGhazi people, but even some people from KIA keep reviving fears of it happening all over again constantly, even though the current climate makes that very unlikely anytime soon.
 
Now that Gamergate has been over for 2 years or so, the people who still post on /r/Gamerghazi and /r/KotakuinAction really display some of the worst fucking people on both sides of the political spectrum. They're a nice snapshot of extremist morons on both sides.

Why they all die and go to Hell, their punishment will be to be drowned up to their necks in sewage, surrounded by each other, all spewing liquid feces from their mouths at each other.
 
The fallout and ramifications are pretty interesting. The collapse in trust with gaming media and the left's partial alienation in gaming these things really got rolling In gamergate it's just you're reallyout of touch if you think all the people who loathe Anita are gamergate.

The problem is that these people think an argument over video games is the root of modern politics.
 
The problem is that these people think an argument over video games is the root of modern politics.

Well, distilled down enough and it is.... the "Agree with us and signal your virtue by making hte following changes in your life, or else you're racists/sexists who will be punished by marginalization" is as rampant in entertainment media as anywhere on the left, and its final rejection by the public in the elections is as much to blame on Gamergate as it is on campus "safe spaces" and convenience store robbers elevated to sainthood because they got shot in the process, but they COULDN'T have been breaking the law, they were BLACK.
 
Well, distilled down enough and it is.... the "Agree with us and signal your virtue by making hte following changes in your life, or else you're racists/sexists who will be punished by marginalization" is as rampant in entertainment media as anywhere on the left, and its final rejection by the public in the elections is as much to blame on Gamergate as it is on campus "safe spaces" and convenience store robbers elevated to sainthood because they got shot in the process, but they COULDN'T have been breaking the law, they were BLACK.

Most people don't know what Gamergate is. It's not responsible for the way current politics are.
 
Looks like the Ghazelles want a piece of r/anarchism's "BASH THE FASH" craze.

Untitled.jpeg
Untitled2.jpeg
 
Since 90% of GamerGhazi is also /r/ShitRedditSays I'd be shocked if they did anything. The salt if they did would be glorious, though.

They might bounce a sub- like /r/militant, since that one is nothing but distilled essence of "Tankies," as well as being pretty small. Can't see anything beyond that happening. Reddit is based in San Fran after all.
 
If GamerGhazi ends up getting banned, where will they go? Will @Lowtax be getting a load more dollars?

Lowtax kicked them out in the first place a couple of years ago, right around the time GBS was rebooted. That was the whole point of GBS 2.1, to get all of the shitty left-wing careposting about everything to go away, because the LF Marxists just migrated to GBS when LF was shut down.
 
Anyone who cares about Gamergate in 2017 is a sad case.

As someone who still cares about Gamergate in 2017, yes, that's an apt description. I would like to move on but it's concerning how a whisper game can shape a greater media narrative. It's gotten me to question just how many of the minor stories I've skimmed from mainstream blogsites are actually 90% bullshit.

At this point every media outlet is serving the purpose of validating what their audience wants to be true, which has gotten easier in the age of unlimited data.
 
Lowtax kicked them out in the first place a couple of years ago, right around the time GBS was rebooted. That was the whole point of GBS 2.1, to get all of the shitty left-wing careposting about everything to go away, because the LF Marxists just migrated to GBS when LF was shut down.

But the entire forum is now just extreme left-wing care posting with the only things tolerated being unfunny shit?
 
Since 90% of GamerGhazi is also /r/ShitRedditSays I'd be shocked if they did anything. The salt if they did would be glorious, though.

They might bounce a sub- like /r/militant, since that one is nothing but distilled essence of "Tankies," as well as being pretty small. Can't see anything beyond that happening. Reddit is based in San Fran after all.

Why wouldn't they, if those subs are causing trouble? The reason reddit bans anything is for giving the site bad publicity, and those communities will certainly do that if they start endorsing violence.

As someone who still cares about Gamergate in 2017, yes, that's an apt description. I would like to move on but it's concerning how a whisper game can shape a greater media narrative. It's gotten me to question just how many of the minor stories I've skimmed from mainstream blogsites are actually 90% bullshit.

At this point every media outlet is serving the purpose of validating what their audience wants to be true, which has gotten easier in the age of unlimited data.

I'm sorry, you're on your own there.
 
Edit: I wrote a defense of SA here and then I realized as long as there's mods like FAU around, I can't really defend SA's sense of humor.
 
Why wouldn't they, if those subs are causing trouble? The reason reddit bans anything is for giving the site bad publicity, and those communities will certainly do that if they start endorsing violence.

SRS has had a bad rep for ages and is still up. They've even turned "But what about SRS!" into a meme because any time a community gets tossed from reddit, people bring up that that place is about as bad as the ones that got booted.
 
SRS has had a bad rep for ages and is still up. They've even turned "But what about SRS!" into a meme because any time a community gets tossed from reddit, people bring up that that place is about as bad as the ones that got booted.

SRS is just a pathetic bunch of losers that aren't high profile enough to actually draw media attention, unlike, say, paedophiles or neo Nazis. It's the same reason /r/incels isn't banned despite being probably the most hateful community on the site.

If they actually start endorsing violence on a large scale, they might get some negative mainstream attention, and then the administrators would probably take action.
 
Why wouldn't they, if those subs are causing trouble? The reason reddit bans anything is for giving the site bad publicity, and those communities will certainly do that if they start endorsing violence.

All subreddits are created equal, it is just that some are more equal than others. ShitRedditSays a/k/a SRS has a long history of getting a free pass for everything from brigading to removing the "gilding" button to (arguably) doxing, all with zero pushback from the Reddit Admins. Why this is the case I'm not quite sure, though I've also seen it claimed that at least a few SRS regulars are also board-wide Reddit Admins.

/r/SRSSucks is hardly an unbiased party to stuff like this, but this kind of old thread offers some pretty compelling evidence of the sort of crap SRS pulls.
 
All subreddits are created equal, it is just that some are more equal than others. ShitRedditSays a/k/a SRS has a long history of getting a free pass for everything from brigading to removing the "gilding" button to (arguably) doxing, all with zero pushback from the Reddit Admins. Why this is the case I'm not quite sure, though I've also seen it claimed that at least a few SRS regulars are also board-wide Reddit Admins.

/r/SRSSucks is hardly an unbiased party to stuff like this, but this kind of old thread offers some pretty compelling evidence of the sort of crap SRS pulls.

I know SRS is absolutely terrible, but the fact is that very few subs ever actually get banned at all. The main ones I can think of are jailbait, fatpeoplehate, and a few subs infested with neo Nazis like coontown, european, and altright. All of these were fairly high profile and got the site a lot of negative attention, some of it mainstream.

There are plenty of subs like /r/incels or /r/theredpill which are also absolute cancer, but they aren't banned because they lack the necessary notoriety.
 
It's the same reason /r/incels isn't banned despite being probably the most hateful community on the site.

Oh man, if you've never read /r/hapas you're in for a treat. It's like /r/incels with an extra dose of racial self-hatred.

I'm actually kinda surprised there's no /r/hapas thread here to be honest.
 
Back
Top Bottom