r/FedNews

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
It’s a fantastic deal still. If anyone offered to pay me to September if I resigned this afternoon I would chuck my keycard and laptop at them with joy and frolic off for an extended summer break, and have a job lined up for after the summer hold within two weeks. The feds need to take the offer and get a new job and bank the spare paycheck.
Problem is you have a skill, and an education in demand. A bunch of pencil pushing feds who do nothing but suck up money don't. They know they'll never find another job with this pay and benefits, with such little actual work.

The knowladge that any US citizens could be potentially carrying a gun is only really going to stop one guy who doesn't wanna get shot, but we see feds in large numbers storming into houses to arrest people over bullshit all the time
Only reason that happens is because the feds show up with a dozen or more guys, and most Americans still believe in the inherent good of the system. Look at Ruby ridge, or Waco. When enough people say no, it becomes a gun battle.
 
Curious with all these judges trying to stop Trump, they don't have any standing or legality to do so right? Like they should be disbarred at minimum right?
To be honest, hearing all kinds of crap from everywhere, and even if I'm mostly to the right, I wouldn't want to just eat up anything they say unless I can double-check it. Not because I think they're framing it wrong on purpose, but everyone has their biases when playing for their team.

Another example of it that might be a lil off-topic: that South African expropriation act. The right says it's anti-white, but I've tried looking into it, and couldn't really find any specifics. Not denying it could be the case, but hesitantly settling on "no opinion, for now". Does anyone know anything about it? Any resources, perhaps?
 
It’s a fantastic deal still. If anyone offered to pay me to September if I resigned this afternoon I would chuck my keycard and laptop at them with joy and frolic off for an extended summer break, and have a job lined up for after the summer hold within two weeks. The feds need to take the offer and get a new job and bank the spare paycheck.
@Otterly Its only a fantastic deal in the private sector where job hopping from company to company is fairly standard (and why its never been offered in the private sector). In the Federal sector your kind of in it for life since almost every Fed position is a lifetime career position where you learn almost esoteric knowledge on Federal bureaucracy that isn't used practically anywhere else.

Feds do job hop, but only from Fed job to Fed job. Getting 8 months of pay + benefits isn't as attractive when the only jobs your interested in are Federal jobs, which you have just barred yourself from by taking the deal. Hence why such a low number of Feds actually took the deal.

The reason the deal is so sweet on the surface of course is that its going to be an absolute bitch to legally fire all these Fed fucks since they are pretty much in in for life and their predecessors have built so many barriers to block this very purge from happening.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6970038
View attachment 6970043

Does anyone remember when that acquaintance of the Hog from the Spoony thread suicide-baited in the most comical way imaginable for attention? I think Null even pinned the screenshot to the top of the site for a while.
This is the fed equivalent to that.
This might be a weird thing to get autistic about, but I think this person in particular might be the kind of well-meaning but naïve worker who never makes it to the upper ranks, but spends her career being the "good worker". I can't find her name so I can't confirm for sure, but she and her husband have little signs in this picture of "I need comfort." with the chair and pet bed being the most obvious examples.
1739329437987.png
 
This might be a weird thing to get autistic about, but I think this person in particular might be the kind of well-meaning but naïve worker who never makes it to the upper ranks, but spends her career being the "good worker". I can't find her name so I can't confirm for sure, but she and her husband have little signs in this picture of "I need comfort." with the chair and pet bed being the most obvious examples.
View attachment 6972356
Some people need comfort because they have strained themselves to the limit doing difficult and uncomfortable things. Other people need comfort because they have so insulated themselves from the real world that any irritant, no matter how slight, causes a meltdown. Some people have even cultivated their lives so a lack of proactive outside comforting is perceived as an unbearable hardship.
 
Curious with all these judges trying to stop Trump, they don't have any standing or legality to do so right? Like they should be disbarred at minimum right?
Sorry for the legal sperging, Judges do have the power to enjoin (ie prevent) the program if it violates a law, but the unions have had difficulty articulating what law is being violated. Someone here pointed out rules on limits for admin leave and such, but none of that would prevent the administration from approving exceptions to it if they wanted to. It’s also not clear that the unions that brought the Massachusetts case have standing to challenge it, they did not claim that their organizations were harmed in some way. Most of their complaint is just non-legal complaining, but they seem to be arguing that the government doesn’t have the power to pay people not to work for an extended period. That is wonky from a standing perspective, people can’t just bring a case saying the government exceeded its power without an injury in some way (or a statute that gives standing). To try and articulate an injury, they complained that the deadline to make the decision was too short, causing stress.

That leads to another funny thing of what an injunction looks like here. A judge can’t prevent people from resigning, so they are still accepting resignations. This is why the Administration is characterizing the preliminary injunction as a request to extend the deadline, which is hilarious but also not an unreasonable read.

This is a democrat friendly district no doubt, the circuit court of appeals is entirely democrat controlled, and Jackson oversees the circuit, so there will be no lifting of the preliminary injunction. It’s hard to read the tea leaves on where the court might go, my guess is they just drag it out, but who knows.
 
Sorry I don’t have the option to edit my last post or I would. I was wrong…the judge ruled this evening that the unions lacked standing and lifted the preliminary injunction. Let the fedditor tears flow.
 
Screenshot_86.png
you know what's funny these federal employees are so angry that they're being held to the same standards that they pretend to hold other people to
Screenshot_87.png
especially love this comment chain where they admit to killing people's cars for having Mega bumper stickers these people are legitimately insane and Trump should literally have every federal employee publicly executed in front of the White House
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_85.png
    Screenshot_85.png
    50.4 KB · Views: 82
At this point, why not replace 98% of them with AI? The only reason there should even be a human is if something malfunctions. AIs also don’t sleep, bitch or donate taxpayer dollars to Democrats in some ouroboros of sheer faggotry.

Let’s move forward!
 
LMAO
View attachment 6977971

Many tears, here's one...
View attachment 6977973

L (can't archive, it keeps saying the post was deleted, even though it isn't)

View attachment 6978073
View attachment 6978074

Fedposting in r/fednews? lol
View attachment 6978075
L
Which branch of government do these people think they work for? I keep seeing these assertions that Trump is destroying checks and balances, and thinking, 'He's your boss, bish.' It's not like he's trimming the judiciary or cutting congressional staff. They're in the executive branch, there to support the executive. It's like they view themselves as the government and the elected officials are just window dressing there to support them.
 
Curious with all these judges trying to stop Trump, they don't have any standing or legality to do so right? Like they should be disbarred at minimum right?

The answer goes back to Andrew Jackson:
"Judge John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!"
 
Last edited:
The trick is that after this voluntary separation period with comfy severance comes the involuntary separation period when they'll be fired for cause and get nothing. Feds who have never worked outside of government don't seem to be aware of this phenomenon.
... if only someone had warned them.
 
What's strange is that if your in certain departments, on admin leave and or on probationary employment that there were bright neon signs tattooed to your eyeballs that your ass was getting launched out the plane first. Why the fuck wouldn't you take the severance deal????

I explained earlier why a lot of federal employees wouldn't take the deal. But if there is basically no chance your not getting the boot, you might as well take the comfy landing. Then again, why should I expect redditors of all people to actually have basic cognitive functions.
 
What's strange is that if your in certain departments, on admin leave and or on probationary employment that there were bright neon signs tattooed to your eyeballs that your ass was getting launched out the plane first. Why the fuck wouldn't you take the severance deal????

I explained earlier why a lot of federal employees wouldn't take the deal. But if there is basically no chance your not getting the boot, you might as well take the comfy landing. Then again, why should I expect redditors of all people to actually have basic cognitive functions.
Because they think it’s a fight they can win.
 
Back
Top Bottom