That's some ghostwritten bullshit. Let us count the signs:
1. Focuses on "improvement", even "return to the workforce", because people are more inclined to help those who help themselves. Phil cannot have such an insight because, as a terminal autistic, he has zero idea as to what motivates other people.
2. Mentions the wish to get out of the tugboat, a sign that the writer is aware that welfare queens are generally looked down upon, and are not the patriarchy-smashing, anti-establishment heroes in Phil's imagination.
3. Mentions normal aspirations and interests, interests that the potential audience may well share. Many people love to take photos; only Phil loves to collect pastel-colored baseball bats and movie knife knockoffs.
4. Not a note on his customary bizarro expenses: the shuttling between States; the infamous storage unit; the growing pile of worthless weapons, and the million surgeries he said are in the pipeline. The writer knows these will be questioned.
5. Most importantly, not a word on Kiwi Farms, Gamergate, etc. Because no one fucking cares. Mentioning these just make you sound paranoid and unhinged -- hardly someone the workforce wants.
6. Finally, an abundance of what I call 'Apple words': innovate, ideas, create, envision. These words aren't significant in isolation, but when many of them come in a short span -- the phrase 'innovate and create' appeared twice -- you can be sure that the writer is projecting an image that is young, enthusiastic, smart, and 'at it'. The mysterious writer is trying to sell Phil as an iPad!
In summary -- this message is deliberately designed to pull the heartstrings, it paints Phil as "just like you but down on luck, but if you give him money he'd have far to go". It shows too much awareness to its potential audience; it fails the Phil Test.
The next question is, of course, who the ghostwriter is.