Personality Assessment System - What if MBTI, but glowie?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Polychromos said:
I'm really disappointed. I thought it was cool that it gives negative descriptions, but it even got one of the primitives completely wrong. Like it thinks I was a withdrawn child, which is objectively not true. This is defeneatly on the same level as astrology.
Click to expand...
I think it probably has some accuracy or at least value but its also antiquated, much like psychology is, in that it doesn't understand the modern world/internet.

One of the questions was about barricading yourself in your room after experiencing I guess "social burnout" and it proposed that you'd just listen to music alone or daydream... the entire concept of sitting alone and being social on the internet never existed when this was conceived.

Similarly there are other questions about school and some other things that aren't case specific enough or place a huge emphasis on "studying" at school for papers etc. There is no option for "I just didn't study, child".

I think that one of the core changes the internet has brought about, and can specifically be seen in recent mass shooters/insane people is atomized beliefs/politics/hobbies that are indiscernible to anyone who hasn't spent their entire life in the same schism interacting with the same people. I don't think "psychology" nor a test like this can really deal with that level of societal change.

edit: and it should of course be mentioned that this is just a multiple (or rather binary) choice test with like 100 questions or some shit. It can never be anything more than extremely broad.
 
So basically i'm an autistic sociopath.
The primary characteristic of the e*ra, [IcRuAu] described above, is his social-interpersonal initiative. He learns to be an active, aggressive, social being. The e*ru, on the other hand does not learn this social initiative. The primitive IRU is characterized by passivity, usually interpreted by others as shyness; the e*ru is the sort of IRU who maintains his shyness in adulthood.

The e*ru, nonetheless, has much in common with the e*ra*. [IcRuUc] He has the external I orientation and general environmental orientation seen in the e*ra*. [IcRuUc] However, it is not usual for the e*ru to be the physically aggressive and self-confident individual common in the e*ra* [IcRuUc] cluster. The e*ru is more apt to have to have some form of intellectual orientation. He is likely to be a contemplative, thinking person who tries to discipline his ideational abilities rather than repressing or displacing them as does the e*ra*. [IcRuUc] As a result, the e*ru is a more independent and seclusive person than the e*ra*. [IcRuUc] He is less inclined to compete for general social recognition and, thus, lacks the ostentatiousness and aristocratic bearing of the e*ra*. [IcRuUc]

It is fairly common for the e*ru to become extremely work-oriented. He is even more of a specialist than the e*ra* [IcRuUc] and, in most cases, seems to be more involved in and challenged by his work or professional interests. There is the same kind of slavish devotion to authority that is seen in the e*ra*, [IcRuUc] but the e*ru is much more passive, egocentric, and detached.

The e*ru is a sensually oriented person who is selfish and demanding in the manner in which he satisfies his personal needs. He is also inclined to be vindictive and punishing toward those who rebuff or ignore him. The e*ru is also a very selfish person, but he is more self-sufficient and independent than the eru. [EuRuUu] In many ways, the e*ru is the most self-seeking because he has limited capacity for empathy and has done little to improve his ability by education or training. He also has limited social versatility but has done little to learn a fixed or uniform social role. He tends to be indifferent to social conventions and, to a large degree, has very little ethical or moral sense.

His primary asset is his ability to learn mechanical-procedural tasks in a highly efficient manner. Once he has learned a skill, he is protective of his own time and effort, tending to become negativistic whenever he is distracted, annoyed, or frustrated. He gets his psychological satisfactions from his own activity and accomplishments, if he is allowed to do things at his own pace and in his own manner. He not only gets no satisfaction from the praise and recognition of others, but actually feels that such behavior is an invasion of his privacy. The i*ru [EcRuUu] will often go to great lengths to prove he has overcome his susceptibility to praise and recognition, but the e*ru is likely to be indifferent and non-responsive to flattery and other involving attempts because such activity represents no threat to him. He only becomes impatient whenever such behavior interferes with or frustrates his own activities.

The adjustment of the e*ru is very much a function of the extent to which he is allowed to develop his own interests and aptitude. Although he is very dependent on external guidance and discipline, he relies more on the rituals and procedures of his instructors. He learns how to do things in certain prescribed ways and is very loyal to these systems and methods. In this sense, he is very conventional and precise. Many skilled artisans such as watchmakers, wood carvers, and goldsmiths are found in this cluster. Although talented, such people will rarely be original or creative because they are so dependent upon the traditions and methods of the past.

Maladjustments in the e*ru may occur when his natural inclinations or skills are frustrated or denied, or when he is forced to operate in a situation requiring innovation and change. The e*ru is also resistant to situations demanding a sense of social responsibility or interpersonal understanding.

Generally speaking, he is independent, impatient, insensitive, intolerant of versatility, and negativistic toward change. Alcoholism, particularly solo drinking, and hypo-chondriasis are common neurotic manifestations of the maladjusted e*ru. Paranoid ideas of reference or influence, and suspicious negativism are relatively frequent occurrences.
Im perfect material for this forum :smug:
 
Otterly said:
Ive always found the utter brutality of this typing to be funny. Total ego takedown. It doesn’t hold back does it? It’s like astrology for masochists.
Also honeypot but whatever
Click to expand...
Another IRU eh? I loved being described as prone to impulsively jacking off. :\

ETA: Oops, this should have been a reply to @Miragestallio .

It got some of me dead on so accurately it was freaky, but other aspects not even close. I didn't help that many of the 'primitives' would have best been answered by a 3rd option for me, about a quarter of the questions neither answer applied.
 
Hey boys IFU here are you ready for alla this sexy autism (This is just like zodiacs but for hot girls)
 
Glowie adjacent psychologists are going to have a field day writing about this thread.
 
Does this count as self-phonebooking?

Primitive type: IRA

The [IRA] is one of the most deceptive adjustments and is particularly difficult to describe. Early behavioral passivity is characteristic and seems attributable to the fact that the activity of the Primitive is primarily ideational. The random, primitive motor behavior of the [E] is obvious to the external observer and can be readily described. The random, primitive ideational behavior of the infant can only be inferred. However, the psychological commitment to this type of activity results in a lessening of motor activity, hence the use of the term passive to describe behavior.

Obviously, the infant does respond to external stimuli. However, the external stimuli usually must be strong or intense to arouse a reaction. Also, if the infant is "preoccupied" with mental or ideational activity, the process of interrupting the preoccupation in order to respond to an external stimulus is more disrupting to the child than to the [E]. As a result, the "startle reaction" of the child is more marked. The child soon learns to be apprehensive while engaging in ideational activity and usually begins to seek some kind of external support on which he can depend for succor and protection. This should be contrasted with the "comfort" the [E] infant feels when responding and interacting, and the apprehension and need for support he feels when compelled to be mentally occupied and passive. A fundamental significance of this difference is that the [E] child reacts to and becomes involved with most any external figure who is warm and protective, while the child learns to respond to and depend upon familiar figures, primarily. The relationship of mother and child (as a rule) has more significance to the child than to the [E] child. The child has greater ability to retain and remember past experience than does the [E] child who is inclined to be fickle and forgetful. Depending upon life circumstances and the development of discipline and control, the individual tends to acquire readily a verbal (or mental) memory while the [E] individual readily acquires a visual (or motor) memory. Symbols and abstractions are, as a result, more real for the Primitive and are developed more rapidly.

A major problem of the individual during his formative years is that he invents symbols and abstractions having only personal or individual meaning. This primitive autism may interfere with language development in the child because he has little need for the socially relevant symbols. The highly intelligent [E] child may learn language very rapidly because he encounters little interference and has a strong drive to relate. The child has little drive to relate and is usually satisfied with his personal symbolism. If the individuals in his environment learn to respond to his expressed need for succor, the will initially have little urge to expand or develop his communication ability. Private language, therefore, is much more common in the developing child than in the [E] child.

In most instances, the [IRA] baby is described as a "good" baby. This usually means the child is self-reliant (i.e. he entertains himself for long periods without involvement and activity); he makes few demands and these are usually related to his need for food and care; he responds more actively to the people he knows (the baby will cry when given to strangers and will resist care from people he does not know and recognize). Thus, the tendency to provoke "mother to jealousy" -- typical of the [ERA] baby -- is less commonly seen in the [IRA] baby. However, the protectiveness and close relations (succor relation) of a mother with her child may very well may precipitate resentment in a husband or in the other children. By the same token, the child, as he matures, demands time and attention of his "succor figure" and may be hostile and destructive towards those who interfere with this relationship.

The maturity rate of the [IRA] can be surprisingly smooth. Under direction and guidance from an external figure, the [IRA] is very imitative. Unlike the [ERA] and [ERU], who perseverate a behavioral activity because they become involved with it, the [IRA] (under direction) will go just far enough in a behavioral activity to satisfy his director and then will relapse into mental activity (where, of course, the [IR] is more inclined to perseverate). The [IRA] individual's behavioral maturity rate is, then, a definite function of the specific guidance and direction he receives.

The [IRA] is, however, susceptible to mixed influences. He will not only respond to the direction and control of anyone who provides it, he will also attract considerable competition for that control. Conflict between parents and grandparents, between parents and teachers all can have much influence on the development of the [IRA]. He is in definite danger of becoming all things to all people, while remaining an independent, self-sufficient person.

The [IRA] will be an interesting, attractive infant and will receive a considerable amount of attention. Actually, many [IRA] babies will find the attention and involvement unsatisfactory and frustrating, since the natural inclination is more for self-sufficiency and self-preoccupation. As a result, there will be a tendency for early resistance and hostility (a determination to be let alone) in the [IRA]. Negativism (but more passive than in the [ERU] and [EFU]) is a general characteristic of the early adjustment of the [IRA]. This usually takes the form of some type of irritating activity that will cause temporary abandonment of the child. In other words, the [IRA] child tends to be negativistic to avoid attention, while the [ERU] is negativistic to gain attention. This characteristic of self-centeredness and psychological independence also reinforces the [IRA] child's dependency upon the figure who "understands" him and makes any separation from this figure a traumatic event in his early development. Also, the shyness in the [IRA] is quite different from the embarrassment of the [ERU] (who is afraid his emotional needs will not be reciprocated). This general difference between the emotional dependency of the [E] child and the succor dependency of the child is a key concept in the entire descriptive system.

The initial passivity, imitativeness and clinging dependency of the [IRA] child is generally only suitable during the early years of his life. By the time he is ready to start to school, he is under considerable pressure to become more independent and responsible. Since the [IRA] child (because he is [A]) can mask his mental preoccupation by skillful role playing, he can learn to be adept at keeping psychological distance by his external social role. In many instances, after a traumatic period early in his school years when he has had to adapt to a strange new environment and has learned to adjust to the rejection by his initial succor figures, he is likely to be very well behaved and apparently well adapted. He has learned to use his social role-playing to keep people at a distance while at the same time appearing to be more involving and relating than he is. To a large extent, the teachers are preoccupied with the "problem" children and assume the [IRA] is making a much better adaptation than may actually be true. With a minimum of discipline (or effort), the [IRA] child can do well in most primary mental activities and there is usually a tendency to overestimate his mental ability. Generally speaking, the [IRA] child is credited with excellent mental and social maturity (as compared with (1) the [IRU], who is usually thought to have excellent social maturity but weak or erratic mental ability; (2) the [ERA], who is considered to have excellent social maturity but lazy mental habits; and (3) the [ERU], who is considered to have poor social maturity but good mental maturity).

Adolescence is usually the major crisis period for the [IRA]. At this time the pseudo-maturity of his childhood becomes more obvious and he is under greater stress than at any other period. During this period, he is very likely to become more negativistic and hostile, primarily because he is expected to abandon his succor dependency relationships and take more responsibility for himself and his sustenance. At the same time, there are more emotional demands on the [IRA], i.e. he has learned to be an inviting, involving person on the surface, and as such, attracts others. Since the [IRA] is losing his familiar succor figures (they are forcing him to be independent), he begins to be very attracted to new potential succor figures. The adolescent [IRA] searches quite immaturely for security and self-sufficiency. Teenage marriage, unrealistic attitudes towards work, and running away from home (either literally or in the figurative sense of becoming psychologically isolated and preoccupied) are common to this group. In addition, the ideational splitting (i.e. the autistic inner experience that is masked by conventional social role playing) becomes obvious, inappropriate and disabling.

Apparent maturity in childhood and equally apparent immaturity in adolescence are characteristic of the [IRA]. More so than most other Primitive Types, the ultimate adjustment of the [IRA] is determined by his adolescent experience.

Basic type: IcRcAc

This is the most tension-producing adjustment of the primitive IRA orientation since it is, in effect, a reaction formation. In spite of this, it is the most common adjustment of the primitive cluster and an is a generally satisfactory and an efficient solution.

Among those with high intelligence, this is the pattern of the true intellectual. At average and and lower levels, the e*f*u* tends to be a cautious sensitive person who places great importance on his ability to be feeling and relating. To a large extent, the e*f*u* tries to be a selfless person who dedicates his life to learning how to understand and help others. He feels very guilty and disturbed by any tendency on his part to be self-centered, selfish, and self-seeking. He avidly learns techniques for observing and remembering the things that go on around him; he learns and tries to apply all possible methods of developing insight and understanding. He is particularly interested in the improvement of mankind, in general. The e*f*u*, obviously, is an idealist, but his effectiveness ranges all the way from total unrealism to highly complex theoretical productivity. The philosophical idealist usually comes from this cluster and, as such, he is very wary of the empiricist and the naturalist and is very careful not to be inductive in his reasoning.

While the i*f*u* [EcRcAc] is often similar, he is much more intensely intellectualized. He, too, is threatened by his tendency to be tempted by empirical-naturalistic data and becomes negativistic to this sort of stimuli. The e*f*u*, in contrast, is much less negativistic because denial is not necessary for him. Empirical-naturalistic stimuli simply do not exist for him; therefore, anyone who claims that it does exist is either a charlatan, or a hypocrite. Self-weakness, the tendency toward idle thoughts, mind wandering, and purposeless existence is much more threatening for the e*f*u*. He tries to be an active, independent person who disciplines his body and his mind in order to be socially productive. Learning, study, planned experience, and theoretical evaluation are, for him, the means to creative living. Life is the search for truth, and truth can be obtained only by rational, objective, and scientific study. The pragmatist is likely to be influenced by his own needs; his ideas and beliefs distorted by his own objectivity. Essentially, this is also true for the e*ra, [IcRuAu] a response pattern the e*f*u* actively avoids. It is less true for the i*fu [EcFuUu] or i*f*u* [EcRcAc] who, we believe, have a sensitivity and an perceptivity to external events that is lacking in the e*f*u* and the i*fu. [EcFuUu] However, the e*f*u* is indifferent to the i*fu [EcFuUu] - because he "knows" that the latter is wrong. The i*f*u*, [EcRcAc] on the other hand, is extremely hostile toward the i*fu, [EcFuUu] because he threatens to subvert the i*f*u* [EcRcAc] adjustment.

The e*f*u* does not take the active social role of the e*f*a. [IcRcAu] Indeed, he is opposed to the social effectiveness of the e*f*a [IcRcAu] because he believes him to be too much influenced by the needs and desires of the group. The e*f*u* has much more need to change society than to conform to it. As a result, he is much concerned with how things should be, and less concerned with learning how to adjust to life as it is. Missionaries, political scientists, organization and management specialists, economists, jurists, and psychotherapists are fairly common in this cluster. Conventionality, in the sense that they learn and apply the traditional, the tried, and the authority-based solutions, is characteristic of the e*f*u*, but this does not include conformity. The e*f*u* is usually an active reformer who wants to do what is right, proper, and just.

The e*f*u* is considerably more intense than the e*f*a*, [IcRcUc] although both tend to drive themselves in order to avoid lassitude and passivity. The e*f*a [IcRcAu] can get considerable satisfaction from his social activity and becomes fatigued and discouraged when he fails to live up to his responsibilities on the job or to his family. The e*f*u* is much more prone to disillusionment, discouragement, and an depression. His sense of responsibility is much wider for it includes all mankind. His failure to have the influence he feels he should have, the failure of people to live up to his expectations, or his own loss of energy and drive tend to disturb and, often, disable him. Fatigue states and tension disorders of all kinds are common in this pattern. Because of his reliance on ideas, concepts, and abstractions as a means of explaining life, paranoid delusions of a megalomaniacal nature may occur in some e*f*u* individuals. Since, at best, he is an intense, dedicated person who feels the need for change or correction, it is not unusual for the e*f*u* to be forthright and even combative in expressing his feelings and attitudes.

Most of the discussion above applies to e*f*u* in the upper ranges of intellectual capacity. In the middle and an below average ranges, there is a tendency for the e*f*u* to become very involved with movements for social change and social benefit. Many e*f*u* will be very active in religious and an fraternal organizations that have social welfare and humanitarian aims. These people are also very active in taking courses that provide training in leadership, supervision, personality development, public speaking, and other forms of intellectual discipline. Mystical and philosophical groups also attract many from this cluster, although they do not have the same fascination for this group as for the i*f*a*. [EcRcUc] Generally speaking, the middle level e*f*u* is humanitarian, sentimental, and conventional. He takes his religion, patriotism, and family responsibilities very seriously.
 
IRA IcRcAc
So I'm a semi social sped with bouts of megalomania and a deep seated want to Save the WorldTM. That has to LARP as a functional human to achieve his goals and get's defeated by thinking too long.
 
XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG said:
Gotta be careful in reading the stuff because of antiquated language
Like, "schizophrenic" to mean structurally self-referential/inward-facing. Or "narcissistic" meaning being more interested in the self than in external objects or relationships. Or "autistic" meaning minimizing dependency on interpersonal input for meaning.
Click to expand...
Half of that is not antiquated language though, but simply terms from psychology that have been thoroughly raped by the public. Not even talking about concepts like Penis Envy, but also simpler ones like "narcissism".
 
Maldavius Figtree said:
Half of that is not antiquated language though, but simply terms from psychology that have been thoroughly raped by the public. Not even talking about concepts like Penis Envy, but also simpler ones like "narcissism".
Click to expand...
True, it's also very clinical language
This "test" or classification is not meant to be some sort of guidance for the testee, but rather a clinical assessment
 
IFU as well... if you play your cards right.:tomgirl:

AI generated IFU summary because I ain't reading all that:

The [IFU] is mentally active but socially indifferent early on, resists authority, and may seem detached until real engagement is forced. Once engaged, they’re highly creative, self-motivated, and capable of deep, specialized mastery, often at the expense of social maturity. They learn by insight rather than rote, can become intensely absorbed in narrow interests, and tend to grow into unconventional, highly competent specialists (the “absent-minded professor” type).
Click to expand...

Pretty accurate. Was called "absent minded professor" specifically by a handful of teachers.
 
Miragestallio said:
>While the e*ru [IcRuUu] may rape with little awareness of the object -- he may be guilty of sexual assault of an aged woman
Click to expand...
>Chris-chan is my soulmate
its-over-soyjak-3207803484.gif
 
It's a neat parlor trick but I don't think it accounts for augmented self-awareness or nuance, there's a lot of generalizations in questions and the more focused second portion is still limited for anything but surface-level "is this person absolutely retarded" assessments. It serves its purpose but I'm glad this sort of thing died out because if I heard people repeating strings of letters like they did astrological signs I'd punch them in the face for being a NiGgEr.
 
According to the test I am OCD and compared to other basics I am the biggest apathetic self centered asshole among them.
NGL it's fun to read how personalities was perceived at the time.

The primary characteristic of this adjustment is that the i*r*u makes little effort, and an has little interest, in establishing social-interpersonal relationships. Essentially, this in an introverse adjustment that can be manifested either in preoccupation with intellectual-procedural activities or in introspective pre-occupations with self. Since such a person is fundamentally very sensitive to environmental relationships, it takes considerable psychological energy to block out or control this sensitivity. Actually, however, the i*r*u is more comfortable in doing this than is the i*r*u* [EcFcAc] because he is less subject to social-interpersonal stress. Initially, the i*r*u is prone to feel the need to migrate his loneliness and not allow his introspection to depress him to the point of non-productivity. The i*r*u*, [EcFcAc] on the other hand, as a primitive A, is the target of considerable distraction in the social area; he must learn to reject this before he can concentrate on his intellectual procedural activities. Thus, the i*r*u* [EcFcAc] tends to be hostile while the i*r*u tends to be somewhat naive or immature in social interpersonal interactions.

Obviously, intellectual level is a very important factor in the social effectiveness of this pattern. The bright i*r*u can develop his capacity for concentration and an may become a highly effective specialist in fields that require close intellectual-procedural attention. Those with less than average intelligence are less effective and more prone to be disabled by their inferiority and an inadequacy feelings. The energy required to maintain the i*r*u adjustment is so great that strain occurs very easily; thus, the i*r*u has a low threshold for fatigue and an is always vulnerable to stress reactions, depressions, and an fatigue syndromes. Aging can be particularly traumatic for members of this cluster; an appreciable number of men who have involutional depressions upon retirement, or those who have "nervous breakdowns" after a prolonged period of work, are found here.

To become an i*r*u, the primitive EFU must repress both his dependency needs and his emotional sensitivity. Thus, the i *r*u is under considerable unconscious stress when in situations that require these abilities. While the i*r*a* [EcFcUc] becomes authoritarian and autocratic, or even paranoid, the i*r*u will be highly self-centered and extremely independent. As a result, most i*r*u will be highly self-centered, extremely independent, or defensive persons who may be oblivious to the needs and demands of others. They do not have the insulation of the iru, [IuRuUu] but, instead, have an almost unconscious awareness of others needs against which they react negativistically. Thus, the i*r*u may become the most indifferent, the most self-centered, and an the most detached in environments that highly stimulate him to be otherwise.

The i*r*u adjustment can be maintained only through considerable orderliness and discipline. Compulsiveness, then, is an important feature of the pattern. The i*r*u is more likely to have a compulsive character, to be generally orderly and intense, than to be obsessive-compulsive in the classic sense. Obsessive-compulsive features occur most frequently in the uncompensated, but modified adjustment: i'-e', r'-f, a'-u' at the surface level.
 
neger psykolog said:
I think it probably has some accuracy or at least value but its also antiquated, much like psychology is, in that it doesn't understand the modern world/internet.
Click to expand...
It was meant to measure people through the societal lens of the US during the fifties. Some of the descriptions even warn about that personality type being more drawn to commies (gasp!) No wonder its so quaintly and optimistically dated. This is the era where only having a few close friends from childhood and no career and several hobbies rolling by the your mid 20s were seen as highly unusual and pathological. Not having a steady gf or a reputation as a ladies man would have been seen as positively aberrant. Psychologists of the era let loose on the internet in 2026 would probably just turn into some kind of Batman villain, going apeshit with a lobotomy needle and a hammer.
 
Overall profile: Iu Fc Uo
The IFU description wasn't so bad, then the Iu description saying I'm probably a sadist was funny, I'm only a tiny bit of a sadist to retards online and people who piss me off for months at a time, I try not to be mean.
The part about being a retard before social contact though? Yeah that part is accurate lol
 
Io Ru Ac
The e*ru* has not only repressed his internalized or ideational tendencies, but has also denied or reacted against social-interpersonal relationships. The independence and self-reliance of the e*ra [IcRuAu] is also characteristic of the e*ru*, but the role playing skill and interpersonal exploitation are not present. As a result, the e*ru* is an active athletic person, but is much more seclusive and socially withdrawn than the e*ra. [IcRuAu] Fundamentally, he is a seductive and interesting person in the same way as the e*ra, [IcRuAu] since both adjustments stem from the primitive IRA orientation. Negativism, rejection, and hostility are more apparent in the e*ru* than in the e*ra, [IcRuAu] since he must defend himself against the involving attempts of others. The eru* [EuRuAc] and the i*ru* [EcRuAc] have the dual problem of defending themselves against the involving attempts of others and controlling or repressing their own needs for involving themselves. This need is not present in the e*ru*, so his negativism and defensiveness are not as sharp and punishing. The eru* [EuRuAc] is most likely to be negativistic toward those who are the most attractive; in this sense, there is some selectivity in his hostile behavior. The e*ru* does not have the same ability to be selective, since his own involvement needs are not as well established. He tends, thus, to be generally rejecting. Since he does not know what to protect against, he defends against everyone. He is as a sullen, defensive person who appears always to have a chip on his shoulder. He usually commits himself to very intensive physical pursuits or, in some cases, to intense mental activities, as a means of avoiding social-interpersonal responsibilities.

The e*ru* has the same self-oriented motivation as the e*ra; rarely, if ever, does he become dedicated to a cause or a principle unless it is frankly self-fulfilling. He can develop marked skill in well-defined motor-manipulative tasks and highly structured mental operations with external application. Some highly effective engineers are found in this cluster, but in most cases, they are highly independent, self-sufficient, and demanding of their own prerogatives. Pilots, particularly those who have no interest or desire to be responsible for others, are common here, also. All manner of men willing to take personal risks for high stakes come from this group.

The primary problem of the e*ru* is that he tends to misperceive and misinterpret his external environment. In the extreme, this can result in psychotic paranoid delusions that are bizarre and unrealistic. In the better adapted e*ru*, this may take the form of profound self-confidence coupled with a distinct suspicion of the ability and competence of others. The e*ru [IcRuUu] * may undertake and successfully complete tasks and activities that other more perceptive individuals will either deem impossible or unrealistic.

The e*ru* is a brusque, impatient person who has limited compassion and psychological understanding. He is rarely deliberately cruel, but he is unfeeling and insulated toward the needs and demands of others He is a good supervisor and leader in the sense that he will not tolerate incompetence or lack of confidence. When he sees what he interprets as weakness, he is ruthless and unfeeling in eliminating the offender. The e*ru* is almost universally feared and respected, but he rarely engenders the bitter hatred characteristically directed against the ira* [IuRuUc] and the era*. [EuRuUc] The i*ra [EcRuAu] and the e*ra [IcRuAu] are also apt to be more hated than loved.

>Pilots, particularly those who have no interest or desire to be responsible for others, are common here.
>All manner of men willing to take personal risks for high stakes come from this group.
>May undertake and successfully complete tasks and activities that other more perceptive individuals will either deem impossible or unrealistic.

IMG_1905.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom