🧊 IP2 ONLYuseMEBLADE / Brian Risso - Serial Groper, Diabetic Alcoholic, ex call of duty content creator

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The golden neckbeard said:
On one hand his meagre income could be taxed to recoup some losses but on the other dude probably has tens of thousands in medical debt and doesn't give a shit about any of it.
Click to expand...
Oh God, the amount of money your local drunk costs your immediate government is staggering. I legitimately believe if the average taxpayer had an idea of how much medical debt, on top of costs to policing and the court system that the average addict/drunk costs the system, the hunting of homeless for sport would be legalized.
 
These clips and vods are probably top content of this year. I am genuinely dumbfounded how someone this retarded is still alive.
Also his creepyness rivals TheQuartering's. I noticed how he would never bump into a man- only the women.
 
LowTierSpitzer said:
These clips and vods are probably top content of this year. I am genuinely dumbfounded how someone this retarded is still alive.
Also his creepyness rivals TheQuartering's. I noticed how he would never bump into a man- only the women.
Click to expand...
Dude, he raped Goocheese on a RV Livestream. You are kind of behind in your Blade lore.
 
The golden neckbeard said:
Is that a real quote? He literally lost $500 last night
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's at 11:10 in this video. Obviously, gambler's remorse over the previous night. I just thought it was ironic that a guy who just moved to a city centered around gambling would denounce the sport. Also, that a guy who has spent the last decade drinking himself into the gutter and out of bodily appendages would presume to lecture anyone on vices.

 
I just watched last nights event skipping to when Lit Romney comes out and that was gold
I was almost crying laughing
I read the thread posts on my lunchbreak and the image of Brian calling Freddy Kruger a "fat nigger" in a drive by scooting had me laughing to myself like a maniac
 
What the fuck?
I spent more time catching up reading the new posts of the thread than Blade spent in the hospital after blacking out on the streets of Vegas.
 
The golden neckbeard said:
I'm not sure if blade is the biggest pro or con for nationalized medicine.
Click to expand...
He's the biggest argument in favor of state-operated/funded involuntary rehab with a "stay sober for 30 days afterward or you go to prison for six months" rider. If you show up at an ER with obvious alcohol poisoning or you OD'd to the point you needed narcan en route, you should be ripe for involuntary in-patient detox/rehab (i.e. commitment) until blood & urine tests show zero and you're behaving yourself well enough to be allowed in public again.

Forcibly relieving people of their addictions (at the state's expense) seems like a worthwhile endeavor to me provided there's a harsh penalty for spitting in its face afterward (i.e. the prison sentence, which should escalate each time the state commits an addict to detox/treat them). Go on a bender, go too far, need medical intervention to not die? Rehab's on us. Straighten up and fly right? No problem, no charge, on your way and godspeed. Shit on this kindness and forced "unfuck yourself" warning? Nah, you're a waste, and you belong in prison or dead.

Candover said:
You could tell me that was a BossManJack quote and I’d believe it.
Click to expand...
Nah, Bossmanjack's verbal tic is "bro," not "dude." And not enough complaining about things being rigged and/or the presence/existence of "rats."
 
8:30pm in vegas right now, last night he was pumped from the hype of somehow not losing anything after blacking out and waking up in the hospital.

Earlier today he woke up, messaged bone about some degen slot streaks (~8am) and probably went back to bed, surely he comes to and goes live soon for the final day of vegas hype?
 
moocow said:
He's the biggest argument in favor of state-operated/funded involuntary rehab with a "stay sober for 30 days afterward or you go to prison for six months" rider. If you show up at an ER with obvious alcohol poisoning or you OD'd to the point you needed narcan en route, you should be ripe for involuntary in-patient detox/rehab (i.e. commitment) until blood & urine tests show zero and you're behaving yourself well enough to be allowed in public again.

Forcibly relieving people of their addictions (at the state's expense) seems like a worthwhile endeavor to me provided there's a harsh penalty for spitting in its face afterward (i.e. the prison sentence, which should escalate each time the state commits an addict to detox/treat them). Go on a bender, go too far, need medical intervention to not die? Rehab's on us. Straighten up and fly right? No problem, no charge, on your way and godspeed. Shit on this kindness and forced "unfuck yourself" warning? Nah, you're a waste, and you belong in prison or dead.


Nah, Bossmanjack's verbal tic is "bro," not "dude." And not enough complaining about things being rigged and/or the presence/existence of "rats."
Click to expand...

I agree with the sentiment but implementation would be a bitch. First off, this would create a huge incentive among addicts to never call police/EMT or take anyone to the hospital (because then they're going to forced rehab possibly followed by jail), and would surely get people killed as a result. Second, people would fight it in court saying they aren't addicts and just made a mistake one time and/or someone tricked them somehow and/or every other excuse under the sun. At which point you might face the issue of having to legally prove that someone is an addict before carting them off to rehab-jail which would be its own massive can of worms.

I think most important is that it simply wouldn't work, for the most part. Addicts that want to get clean can already do it, the tools are there. Addicts that don't want to get clean can't be forced--as soon as they are no longer involuntarily confined, they'll immediately relapse. The reality is that a large chunk of addicts can't be reformed and the only options for them are living as degenerates or being locked up forever. There's no policy on Earth that could change them besides, possibly, a crackdown on their substance of choice which is so severe that it is actually impossible for people to get anymore. Blade is a perfect example of this although he's actually far from the worst as he's able to generate an income and thus doesn't have to sink into the truth depths of horror that many homeless junkies get to experience.
 
moocow said:
He's the biggest argument in favor of state-operated/funded involuntary rehab with a "stay sober for 30 days afterward or you go to prison for six months" rider. If you show up at an ER with obvious alcohol poisoning or you OD'd to the point you needed narcan en route, you should be ripe for involuntary in-patient detox/rehab (i.e. commitment) until blood & urine tests show zero and you're behaving yourself well enough to be allowed in public again.

Forcibly relieving people of their addictions (at the state's expense) seems like a worthwhile endeavor to me provided there's a harsh penalty for spitting in its face afterward (i.e. the prison sentence, which should escalate each time the state commits an addict to detox/treat them). Go on a bender, go too far, need medical intervention to not die? Rehab's on us. Straighten up and fly right? No problem, no charge, on your way and godspeed. Shit on this kindness and forced "unfuck yourself" warning? Nah, you're a waste, and you belong in prison or dead.


Nah, Bossmanjack's verbal tic is "bro," not "dude." And not enough complaining about things being rigged and/or the presence/existence of "rats."
Click to expand...
You got my vote
 
gang weeder said:
Addicts that don't want to get clean can't be forced--as soon as they are no longer involuntarily confined, they'll immediately relapse.
Click to expand...
Those are the ones you shoot dead after the third prison term if they relapse again.

As for concerns about endless litigation, we already have that now, and that will never change. People always fight when you take away their toys. Do it anyway.
 
moocow said:
Forcibly relieving people of their addictions (at the state's expense) seems like a worthwhile endeavor to me provided there's a harsh penalty for spitting in its face afterward (i.e. the prison sentence, which should escalate each time the state commits an addict to detox/treat them).
Click to expand...
The alcohol industry could never abide policies that are harsh on problem drinkers. They account for a huge percentage of their sales. For example, a 2015 study found that

...the bulk of alcohol sales in England in 2013/14 were to individuals drinking excessively. An estimated 77% of alcohol was sold to drinkers consuming above guideline levels: 30% to harmful drinkers and 48% to hazardous drinkers. Further, alcohol consumed in excess of the guideline levels (i.e., those drinking 14 or more standard UK drinks per week) accounted for 44% of all sales.

Moderate drinkers (i.e., those drinking 14 or fewer UK standard drinks per week), who represented an estimated 59% of the population, were estimated to consume only 23% of all alcohol and accounted for only 32% of all revenue (Figure 1). The 21% of the population who were hazardous drinkers consumed an estimated 48% of all alcohol and accounted for an estimated 45% of all revenue. A relatively small group of harmful drinkers, comprising 4% of the total population, consumed almost a third (30%) of all alcohol sold in England, and accounted for nearly a quarter (23%) of all alcohol sales revenue.

Findings indicate the alcohol industry in England derives a large portion of its profit from excessive and/or problem drinkers. Given the consistency of this finding with similar research in Australia and Brazil, it seems likely that such a study conducted in the United States would find similar results.


Moreover, state and municipal governments have no real interest in cracking down on alcohol abuse either. Alcohol sales, bars and liquor stores provide an enormous amount of tax revenue.

The system exists for the rent-extractors, not for you sorry goyim with your petty concerns about civic order.

You could look at it as Blade doing his civic duty by getting litty. He's stimulating a lucrative industry that employs multitudes. Mast-Jaegermeister SE should send him Christmas cards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom