Official homeless people hate thread - It's easy to hate the rich but are you brave enough to hate the poor.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I've evolved from just hating the homeless to hating poors in general. Modern poor people are becoming just as bad, just as entitled, and just as disgusting as modern homeless. I say cut them all off. Have you ever been to Yellowstone or any other National Park that has a population of wild animals? If you have then you've seen all the signs that say "DO NOT FEED THE ANIMALS". Those signs are there because feeding wild animals teaches them to be dependant on humans for food and they eventually stop foraging/hunting for food for themselves. It creates a dependency, which is bad for the animals and can be dangerous for humans when it comes to predators like bears and wolves.

It's the same thing with poors and welfare. The more we "help" the poor with dem programs, the more dependant they become on the taxpayer for suvival and the less incentive they have to support themselves. It's why you'll see five generations of a family where not one single member has ever held down a job. Five generations of girls who got knocked up in middle school, dropped out, and immediately went on the dole and now shits out a new dependant from a different father every year or two to get more taxpayer money each month. Families where you literally have great-great-grandmothers in their late 50s or early 60s.

No, it's time to cut them off and make them fend for themselves. Bleeding hearts will say I'm being cruel and need to show empathy. I say our empathy has been taken advantage of for too long by people who are of no benefit to society, and we have gotten nothing in return to show for it. We have no obligation to these people. It isn't society's fault they're fuck-ups who have made a lifetime of terrible decisions. We didn't force them to do poorly in school. We didn't force them to drop out. We didn't make them have sex at a young age and get knocked up. Just as your continued survival and wellbeing is your own responsibility, their survival and wellbeing is their's.

We need to completely overhaul the welfare and benefits system to remove this burden off the backs of the taxpayers. No more endless gibs. No more multi-generational families on the dole. You get a set time limit of X months where you'll receive financial assistance and then you're cut off. If you weren't able to get back on your feet in that amount of time, then that's your problem to fix. If you starve to death then too bad. We need to be less sympathetic, not more. The ever increasing bloat of the welfare system is not sustainable. Don't waste your empathy on losers who made bad life decisions and are now living in a Hell of their own making.

Just pump them full of narcan. Hobos will wake up in painful sobriety.
They should learn with time to hide while taking their dope.

I say do the extreme opposite: make over-the-counter Narcan illegal. In fact, make it illegal to administer Narcan anywhere that isn't an actual hospital by a licensed doctor. No OTC, no cops, no EMT or paramedics saving worthless junkies from their bad life decisions. If Jimmy the Jobless Junkie takes a hot shot or his Smack is laced with too strong a dose of Fent and he ODs he will have to hang on long enough to actually be admitted into a hospital, have the doctor assess him, and decide Narcan is the way to go. If it took too long to get him to the doc? Oh well. One less worthless junkie in the world.

Why do the homeless insist on having dogs? If they were recently made homeless, I can understand wanting that companionship and motivation to get back on their feet so they can take care of their pet. If they've been out on the streets for a while, it's just cruel if they're already not a working dog.

Basically they're furry alarm systems for the homeless. Homeless are thieves and they will steal from other homeless without a second thought. They'll even steal from their friends. If some homeless parasite goes to camp out for the night or goes on the nod after shooting up in some alleyway, having a dog provides security and an alarm to wake them up if some other employment challenge loser decides to try to sneak something from their beat to shit baby stroller loaded down with garbage.
 
It's why you'll see five generations of a family where not one single member has ever held down a job. Five generations of girls who got knocked up in middle school, dropped out, and immediately went on the dole and now shits out a new dependant from a different father every year or two to get more taxpayer money each month. Families where you literally have great-great-grandmothers in their late 50s or early 60s.
That’s just the new aristocracy bro, instead of cool castles and manor houses we see shitty built townhouses and trailers
 
Older story but my former apartment was in a not so nice part of town but I needed cheap rent because at the time that's all I could afford. Landlord was an old childhood friend who gave a good price in a renovated house turned into a fourplex. I think his idea was to buy up all the foreclosed homes and convert them into semi modern apartments (not the typical luxury ones you see being built everywhere but probably one or two grades below).

Anyway homeless guy who we will call "Jaws" because he snaps at the air with his teeth like the zombies from the walking dead at the offramp next to the apartment ends up wondering into the rear fenced in yard, breaks into my car and runs off with my JBL headphones.

Police don't do anything about it even with video surveillance on the entry area to the yard. Tell my buddy (landlord) about it and he literally calls up his construction crew to show up, find the guy walking around the offramp and beat the shit out of him.

I never got my headphones back. Most likely was pawned off for beer or pot but after that I never saw Jaws in the neighborhood ever again.

Did see him at another city about 30 minutes away so I guess he quite literally got run out of town.

I used to feel sorry for the homeless but after living there I don't anymore. It's 100 percent a choice.
 
Seeing this thread reminded me of how much I do not like public libraries.

For one, "public library" is essentially an oxymoron. To have a quiet environment, privacy is one of the more important factors to consider. When an area is made public, anybody can use it, including the street philosophers that you usually pass by without making eye contact, because you're a dumb ignoramus who doesn't understand true potential.

Kind of astounding how the dirtiest and weirdest folks will gravitate to the free, publicly available stuff, take space in the public computers and force me to circumnavigate the entire section in order to be a proper distance away from them.

The problem with homeless in public goes beyond just the library, it's basically in every public area imaginable, especially in a city. Roads, shopping centers, and the subway, which is basically a homeless shelter 2.0 with DLC added. Basically the only way to insulate yourself from the public cesspit is to be rich, which solves a lot of things surprisingly.
Late reply but my cities library is actually quite nice and the inside is clean. The problem is people sleeping and shooting up on the benches right next to the entrance or people washing out shit from their clothes in the water fountain display.

Really is an eyesore on the community.
 
Kind of astounding how the dirtiest and weirdest folks will gravitate to the free, publicly available stuff, take space in the public computers and force me to circumnavigate the entire section in order to be a proper distance away from them.
"Free" alas, no shit

We as a society need to redevelop bare-toothed prejudice if we are to reclaim 3rd spaces, and it doesn't even have to be racist! Just normalize verbal and cop-administered physical abuse of anyone who dresses like a hobo or acts like a low-impulse lumpenprole and suddenly city families can enjoy public outings to libraries again.

Shame bleeding heart libshits will always ruin this goal
 
This thread makes me really glad that the climate around me makes homeless people an extremely rare sight. Once we start getting into the colder months it gets lethal to sleep outside, so the few we do get are usually just passing through.
 
I never understood why homeless people are so visible, can't you just hide yourself and not bother everyone else ?

And I can't conceive how you can be homeless, if it's the housing that is too costly, just move away and do temporary work until you can sign a contract, take a cheap apartment and that's it. Even if you can't move away conventionally, there is always bus, trains or even just fucking walking if you are desperate. Or even buying a bit of land for cheap and plopping down a small house or even a cabin.

Where I live, the homeless are always the headcases, druggies, alcoholics. The most visible ones at least.
 
1000018069.webp
 
Why do the homeless insist on having dogs? If they were recently made homeless, I can understand wanting that companionship and motivation to get back on their feet so they can take care of their pet. If they've been out on the streets for a while, it's just cruel if they're already not a working dog.

Probably because not even Joe the crackhead wants Jane the crackhead. I'm not kidding unfortunately, I heard from someone who works with rescue dogs that it's not uncommon to find signs of abuse among those dogs.

I have another homeless story I like to share as well.

>be me
>driving to walmart
>in front parking lot, mexican family outside
>i see them
>sparechange.png
>i notice they have kids, like young kids
>almost gives money
>"wait? this is a jewish mind trick"
>drives off


this would've been different if this was a family that seemed down on their luck, but i have a feeling that they are using their children to gather more sympathy. i am hurt that their kids have to stand outside with their parents begging for money, but if i was that dad, i would've done everything I can before begging for money on the streets

I live in a turd world country where there's always an uptick of people using children to beg around Christmas, and some of the children are even rented for this exact purpose. That's something that pisses me off even more than the average bum, imagine being rented by someone who's not even your parent just to scam people without even knowing.
 
I live in a turd world country where there's always an uptick of people using children to beg around Christmas, and some of the children are even rented for this exact purpose. That's something that pisses me off even more than the average bum, imagine being rented by someone who's not even your parent just to scam people without even knowing.
This happens in the States, too, it's not just for shithole countries. There are people who just have no shame and respect for others.
 
Has anybody never actually seen a followup on one of those "tiny homes for the homeless". Something like this
Your average homeless would absolutely destroy this and turn it into a safety hazard for the public. Also why do they deserve tiny homes to begin with normal people aren't allowed to just place a second home on their property but yet they homeless are allowed to squat anywhere
 
Has anybody never actually seen a followup on one of those "tiny homes for the homeless?
My city tried this, as basically everyone including me predicted they very quickly turned the mini houses into dope and fuck shacks and created a shantytown so dangerous that the city sent the cops in to tear it down and evicted all the crackheads.
 
Has anybody never actually seen a followup on one of those "tiny homes for the homeless". Something like this
Your average homeless would absolutely destroy this and turn it into a safety hazard for the public. Also why do they deserve tiny homes to begin with normal people aren't allowed to just place a second home on their property but yet they homeless are allowed to squat anywhere

They'd certainly take all the copper wiring and sell it for a quick buck.
 
There have been a few different attempts to provide housing projects for the homeless. One was a cluster of basically one room bungalows with a small sleeping/living/dining area, kitchenette, and a bathroom with shower. Others have been renovated apartment buildings. They all had common sets of rules: no drugs or alcohol allowed on the property, no visitors allowed on the premises after a certain time, and residents had to be making an attempt to find employment to get on their feet. That was it for the most part. As long as they followed a very simple set of rules they were given a free home for however long they needed it for. Most of these projects weren't even able to get to 20% capacity, and some of them only got to 10% or less.

There have been other projects that have provided free housing to the homeless without even these limited requirements, just giving them homes with no expectations of them. Most of these have been refurbished apartment buildings in larger cities. This was done under the "housing first" model that operates under the theory that the homeless just need a stable place to live, and once they have it they will be incentivized to get their life back in order. Yeah, it didn't work. Again, they faced low occupancy, but got more takers than the projects that had rules and expectations. Predictably, they ended up wrecking their free homes, using them as drug dens, inviting other homeless to squat in their apartments, stripping copper from the walls, using the hallways, stairwells, and even their own apartments as toilets once the copper piping had been stripped and the water cut off, and causing senseless damage to the rest of the building for no reason.

The "housing first" model is bullshit, and thankfully more and more states are coming to that understanding and ending those programs. You can't help these people through charity and kindness. All it does is coddle them. It provides no incentive for them to get their lives in order and just enables their lifestyle. The only way you can fix the homeless problem is through intolerance to their behavior and forced compliance to social norms. Bring back poor houses, mental asylums, and forced drug treatment. It will require changing some laws, but it's the only way to actually fix the problem. You haul them off the streets, assess what their problems are, then send them to the appropriate location. Are they just lazy shits who don't want to work? Then they go to the poor house. Are they mentally ill and refuse to follow their required treatment? Mental asylum. Are they just junkies/drunks who refuse to get clean/dry? Forced rehab.

Seriously, I cannot understand how there are people in this world who genuinely believe that letting these people waste away on the streets all on their own is somehow more humane than actually getting them help, even if they don't want it. They'll bring up the "rights" of the homeless, but I'd argue that those rights should be legally suspended while they are clearly not in a healthy mental state and should only be granted back to them once they have proven they deserve them after going through treatment.
 
I never understood why homeless people are so visible, can't you just hide yourself and not bother everyone else ?
Most homeless aren't evil. They quietly live in their cars, crash on a friend/family member's couch, stealth camp in the woods, and try to claw their way back out of the toilet. Something like 90% of them succeed in getting a place to live in under a year. The perpetually indigent making tent cities on sidewalks and shitting on the street in between robbing each other are black holes of resources, they are satanic cancer. They are the ones these broke brained leftists make shelters for, and they fail to reintegrate with society over 85% of the time. They're not unlucky, they are so malicious and shitty that literally every single person in their life has cut them off. There are so many bridges to having a basic room at a group home, a halfway house, an extended stay motel, a friend or family member's couch, and they burnt all of them. That's who you see proudly sleeping on a piece of cardboard and breaking into businesses in between shambling around in a fentanyl stupor, the lowest deviation of gormless shitheads.

Seriously, I cannot understand how there are people in this world who genuinely believe that letting these people waste away on the streets all on their own is somehow more humane than actually getting them help, even if they don't want it.
That's because "these people", the visible homeless who invariably destroy anything you give them, are fundamentally evil. You can't force a willing addict to improve, they'll go back to their vices the second they leave rehab. You can't fix a demonic schizophrenic that refuses to take their meds so they can listen to the Devil. Locking them in a mental asylum just wastes social resources and lets them shit on the people that are actually sick and can be helped. The correct answer to a negative spiral that can only consume and destroy is to remove its influence on your community and let it kill itself.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure if it's evil but it's definitely incompetence and laziness there are just broken people who cannot be fixed they don't want to work they don't want the responsibility of maintaining things there's a reason why so many people before European contact were nomadic there's a genetic component to this that I would like to see studied one day. Regardless you can't have these people leeching up resources and public space every single aspect of society has to be maintained and we really can't afford to support parasites right now
 
they'd rather arrest him than confront the fact we have hoards of violent drug addicted leeches who have free roam of our society
Protip: act like a smug asshole and drop sarcastic wisecracks such as "but I thought the unhoused are harmless? :smug:". Make sure to use all the buzzwords. Rub their noses in that shit every single time, hound them if you have to. Remain polite in order to make it as hard as possible to dismiss your argument. Feign outrage if need be — perhaps use it in the initial remark, depending on the level of disingenuity.
A non-retard will always beat a retard, as long as he's fine with dragging himself down to their level.
At the very least you'll make them nervous about spouting retardation; perhaps (🌈, I know) even make them think about it.
 
Last edited:
That's because "these pe

I was referring more to the bleeding-heart retards who advocate for homeless to remain on the streets and fight against any laws or ordinances aimed at keeping the homeless away from decent, hardworking people by placing them in rehab and mental health centers where they'll get help. Yes, I know many of them will go right back to their old ways once out, but that's why having laws in place to force them to go back are important. If they go back to bothering decent people by shooting up on the streets or they stop taking their meds and have a public episode on the train, then they get picked back up by the police and sent right back to whichever center they were released from for more treatment. Either they will get wise and fuck off somewhere else so they are no longer a problem for that community, they'll keep their shit together so they'll no longer be hassled by the cops, or they'll just keep getting sent back for more treatment. Either way, they're no longer bothering the good people of the public.

But we have all these bleeding-heart mongoloids, NGOs, and advocacy groups who fight against these kinds of laws (or really ANY kind of laws regarding the homeless that aren't "give them free everything" and "let them do whatever they want") because they say they're "inhumane". And I just don't understand how anyone in their right rational mind could possibly say that letting these people fester on the streets is more human than trying to get them actual help and possibly set them back on the path to being productive members of society. The NGOs and advocacy groups I understand, because they're grifting money off the subject. But the regular bleeding-heart retards I DON'T understand, because they aren't getting anything from it. They aren't enriching themselves with donations and grant money like the NGOs and advocates. They're just regular assholes like you and me.
 
I was referring more to the bleeding-heart retards who advocate for homeless to remain on the streets and fight against any laws or ordinances aimed at keeping the homeless away from decent, hardworking people by placing them in rehab and mental health centers where they'll get help. Yes, I know many of them will go right back to their old ways once out, but that's why having laws in place to force them to go back are important. If they go back to bothering decent people by shooting up on the streets or they stop taking their meds and have a public episode on the train, then they get picked back up by the police and sent right back to whichever center they were released from for more treatment. Either they will get wise and fuck off somewhere else so they are no longer a problem for that community, they'll keep their shit together so they'll no longer be hassled by the cops, or they'll just keep getting sent back for more treatment. Either way, they're no longer bothering the good people of the public.

But we have all these bleeding-heart mongoloids, NGOs, and advocacy groups who fight against these kinds of laws (or really ANY kind of laws regarding the homeless that aren't "give them free everything" and "let them do whatever they want") because they say they're "inhumane". And I just don't understand how anyone in their right rational mind could possibly say that letting these people fester on the streets is more human than trying to get them actual help and possibly set them back on the path to being productive members of society. The NGOs and advocacy groups I understand, because they're grifting money off the subject. But the regular bleeding-heart retards I DON'T understand, because they aren't getting anything from it. They aren't enriching themselves with donations and grant money like the NGOs and advocates. They're just regular assholes like you and me.

Then there are the types of people who whine about the crackhead's right to choose or whatever, as if someone who's either on crack, or on crack withdrawals and stealing to get more crack ASAP is on the right state of mind to make any choice.
 
Back
Top Bottom