US #Obamagate - Trump lashes out at Obama in Mother's Day tweetstorm - Obamagate trends on Twitter.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


------------

President Trump on Sunday repeatedly lashed out on Twitter at former President Obama, days after reports that Obama had expressed concern over the Justice Department's decision to drop the case against former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Trump spent much of his Mother's Day tweeting and retweeting various accounts, with many of the posts aimed at his predecessor. In one tweet he simply wrote "OBAMAGATE!" In another post, in which he retweeted a supporter's declaration that Obama was "the first Ex-President to ever speak against his successor," Trump wrote, "He got caught, OBAMAGATE!"
1589170418152.png
1589170383148.png

Earlier on Sunday, Trump retweeted conservative commentator Buck Sexton, who claimed that "the outgoing president"—an apparent reference to Obama—"used his last weeks in office to target incoming officials and sabotage the new administration." Trump in his retweet wrote, "The biggest political crime in American history, by far!" Sexton is a former employee of Hill.TV.
1589170329805.png
The president also retweeted multiple accounts that posted memes taking aim at Obama, including one account that posted a graphic of Obama over the slogan, "Watergate will look like a parking ticket."

Trump's Obama-related tweets were just some of the many comments he posted on Twitter Sunday, with others lashing out at figures including CNN's Brian Stelter and NBC's Chuck Todd.

His tweetstorm came after his administration's controversial move to drop charges against Flynn, who had been accused of lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia before Trump took office. The decision, led by Attorney General William Barr, was met with swift condemnation by Trump's critics.

Obama became ensnared in the unfolding drama after a private phone call between the former president and members of his administration were leaked to Yahoo News on Friday.

“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama reportedly said.

“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk," he continued. "And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places.”

The White House did not immediately return a request for further comment.

--------------------
 
You really are a kid. If someone asks if you are failtrolling or legit rețarded, you say failtrolling.
Failtrolling. Lol. I'm not in my teens if that's what you're implying.
HK-47 and others have made posts about this in the TDS thread for at least an entire year. You are telling many of us, who have seen you post there, that you have seen none of it. Is this correct?
I've seen the TDS thread. Frankly, I think the hatred towards Trump based on Twitter alone is uncalled for and silences legitimate criticism.

After years of seeing birther conspiracies, contempt from the older generation because of Obama's origin and party affliction, race relations being destroyed because of hypersensitivity and ignorance, I'm a bit skeptical of this ObamaGate at first.

You're telling me that Bush's involvement with war in the Middle East, the housing recession of 2008, Trump's cutting of many programs, pales in comparison to Trump being montiored by the Democratic Party before 2016?

If many corrupt politicans fall because of this, I'm looking at Chicago, Philadelphia, Baltimore, then I would understand and encourage an investigation. It seems like to me, everything is just concerned about Obama and protecting Trump moreso than exposing decades of political corruption that has plagued poorer communities.
 
HK-47 and others have made posts about this in the TDS thread for at least an entire year. You are telling many of us, who have seen you post there, that you have seen none of it. Is this correct?
The ObamaGate posts, no.
 
Failtrolling. Lol. I'm not in my teens if that's what you're implying.

I've seen the TDS thread. Frankly, I think the hatred towards Trump based on Twitter alone is uncalled for and silences legitimate criticism.

After years of seeing birther conspiracies, contempt from the older generation because of Obama's origin and party affliction, race relations being destroyed because of hypersensitivity and ignorance, I'm a bit skeptical of this ObamaGate at first.

You're telling me that Bush's involvement with war in the Middle East, the housing recession of 2008, Trump's cutting of many programs, pales in comparison to Trump being montiored by the Democratic Party before 2016?

If many corrupt politicans fall because of this, I'm looking at Chicago, Philadelphia, Baltimore, then I would understand and encourage an investigation. It seems like to me, everything is just concerned about Obama and protecting Trump moreso than exposing decades of political corruption that has plagued poorer communities.
OK, was Nixon railroaded? Let's start there. If what nixon did was horrible and he needed to be impeached, then pardoned, then why isn't what Obama did horrible?

But nixon only tried to spy on the opposition then hide the crime. He didn't, for example, instruct his people to stay in the next administration and hide things from them. He didn't strategically leak to the press. He didn't get important cabinet members in the next administration arrested on bullshit charges.

Imagine how you would feel if it comes out Trump is having the FBI and police make up crimes against democrats to keep them from being elected. Would you think that's no big deal?
 
Imagine how you would feel if it comes out Trump is having the FBI and police make up crimes against democrats to keep them from being elected. Would you think that's no big deal?
In that case, it would be a big deal.

If this was the 2000s, I would see this being handled in a swift matter. Corruption is nothing new in politics as @heathercho mentioned, evidently.

Ah, so you're saying you never saw any posts about corruption in the Obama admin? All righty then.
All I see is the Democratic Party screwing up and people going in mass hysterics over Trump.
 
The ObamaGate posts, no.
Some threads that were regular fixtures in this board, that I'm really skeptical you've never read before:
The FISA report
Carter Page FISA application
Clinton email scandal OIG report
And those are just the start of it.

If this was the 2000s, I would see this being handled in a swift matter.
literally, the inciting incident that clued in the generation before you to the idea that we'll never get the heads we want delivered on spikes, was Obama utterly failing to prosecute anyone from the Bush administration for their misdeeds. Doubly so if it implicates the entire process of peacefully transferring power.
 
Richard Grenell declassified the unmasking list, everyone you suspect who wanted to railroad Flynn is on the list, even Creepy Uncle Joe, and everything right after the election. What complete wreteched fucks.

What I want to know is, since when can an acting assistant deputy secretary of the Treasury - or of anything - ask for NSA reports to be declassified? How often is this going on? How many nobodies are looking through intel for fun?
 
Most of that didn't happen around the election (Nov 8-10 2016), but around a month later, on the Thursday/Friday leading up to the formal (aka the only part that counts for real) election among electors on Monday 12/19. Did the Russia conspiracy and the intelligence community's attempt to depose the duly elected president really come about after an aborted attempt to use faithless electors to circumvent the election results?

Not only that, many of these unmasking requests pre-date the actual call that Flynn had with the Russian ambassador as a part of Trump's transition team. It was never about Russia.

They had the long knives out for Flynn long before that telephone call.
 
OK, was Nixon railroaded? Let's start there. If what nixon did was horrible and he needed to be impeached, then pardoned, then why isn't what Obama did horrible?

But nixon only tried to spy on the opposition then hide the crime. He didn't, for example, instruct his people to stay in the next administration and hide things from them. He didn't strategically leak to the press. He didn't get important cabinet members in the next administration arrested on bullshit charges.

Imagine how you would feel if it comes out Trump is having the FBI and police make up crimes against democrats to keep them from being elected. Would you think that's no big deal?

It's a sad indictment that the bar for acceptable has fallen so low, people have to stop and think about whether Obama's ratfucking was even noteworthy.... let alone as bad as Nixon's..
 
Last edited:
I suppose I like Obama but despise the Democratic Party. Or at least I abhor Trump enough that experience has taught me that this is moral grandstanding at best.

I hope you don't like him too much, because he's committed a crime several degrees greater than what Nixon was hung out to dry for. He and his administration lied before Congress. They used national resources to spy on their political opponents and, in essence, tried to rig a national election. The president's "moral grandstanding" has been proven correct. The Democratic Party, already in poor health thanks to embracing bad policies nobody votes for, is now in an even more dire state as their black messiah is being exposed as a criminal.

Obama's life and legacy is now entirely in the Trump administration's hands. If he's re-elected (and let's face it, Joe Biden won't be winning given his name is on these dirt sheets), those memes about the first black president going to jail may become reality.
 
Last edited:
Not only that, many of these unmasking requests pre-date the actual call that Flynn had with the Russian ambassador as a part of Trump's transition team. It was never about Russia.

They had the long knives out for Flynn long before that telephone call.
I really want to know why the ambassador to the UN made unmasking requests seven times. Seven. They had to be actively (illegally) listening to him 24/7, but why was the ambassador in on it? It's fucking obscene.
 
I really wonder what @AnOminous thinks about this move by the judge, especially given that same judge has previously issued an order in the very same case that outside parties should have no say within the court docket.

Can Sullivan really just say "fuck you, ignore what I said earlier!"
 
I really wonder what @AnOminous thinks about this move by the judge, especially given that same judge has previously issued an order in the very same case that outside parties should have no say within the court docket.

Can Sullivan really just say "fuck you, ignore what I said earlier!"
Has anyone shown up to arrest him yet?

It appears that yes, he can do that. Because lol fuck you that's why.

I think it's the same ruling that allows supreme court justices not to recuse in cases despite clear prejudice. "What are you gonna do about V. Nobody".
 
Has anyone shown up to arrest him yet?

It appears that yes, he can do that. Because lol fuck you that's why.

I think it's the same ruling that allows supreme court justices not to recuse in cases despite clear prejudice. "What are you gonna do about V. Nobody".

I really do not grasp how a layman is supposed to have any faith in the justice system when they see something like this.
 
Back
Top Bottom